The Lead

Michael Cox has written a bold piece on ESPNFC this morning on the reason why the two Manchesters City and United dominate the Premier League table while still under-performing in Europe. He argues that both teams have eschewed quality for quantity, choosing to pack their first teams with individual stars at the cost of tactical coherence. The money quote:

The best football sides have quality players, but also a clear strategy, making them greater than the sum of their parts. Neither United nor City have achieved this in 2012/13, and although Sunday’s game will be packed with excellent footballers and probably plenty of goals, it won’t be a contest between two great teams – the Premier League currently doesn’t have any.

Coincidentally, James Grayson wrote a post ranking Premier League sides this season so far in Total Shots Ratio—a metric that indicates a team’s ability to control the ball and create chances—and PDO, which measures roughly how lucky a team has been.

The results are striking. In the first category, TSR, Manchester City ranks first at .653, and Man United rank 6th with .565. In terms of PDO, Man United are third and City 7th. Incidentally, Man United’s shot conversion rate is an unsustainably high 29.8%, a figure that Grayson argues is almost certain to come down as the season progresses. Their save percentage is 15th in the league, however, so chances are both figures will level out.

Anyway, this is a lovely example of tactical impressions gaining a little more context with some simple predictive metrics. First, there is some evidence that Man United’s current strategy of conceding goals whilst scoring them at will on comparatively few shots may not allow them to sustain a title run against a Man City that, despite impressions, is far more solid in controlling play.

Also, while Man City leads the Premier League over 15 games with a TSR of .653, its Champions League TSR over 6 matches against some of the best teams in Europe (particularly Real Madrid) was a mediocre .380. This difference is radical enough to question Mancini’s preparation for mid-week fixtures (which has been historically poor), but it also points to the possibility that the Premier League is a significantly easier test (duh duh duh). City’s quality of competition in the PL for example ranks 5th in the league, while United’s is 13th. City have for the most part faced decent competition and prevailed with an impressive record both statistically and in points totals.

The conclusion? Cox’s theory that the club is winging it with star players is plausible; it’s root cause however may be the quality of teams down the table. City are in fact arguably the more dominant team, and United could be relying on the individual brilliance of their squad to convert shots to goals well above the mean between now and May. The issue of a lack of tactical coherence of the two Manchesters may come down to the fact they don’t need it to succeed against the quality on offer from the 2012-13 Premier League.


Steve Bottjer on who should be Canada’s male player of the year.


Redknapp doesn’t rule out bringing Anelka to QPR.

Terry ruled out for Club World Cup.

Ferguson questions number of penalties awarded to City this year.

Wenger confident Sagna to extend contract, Walcott still a question mark.

AVB thinks Chelsea Europa League spot undeserved.

Bradford City ousted from FA Cup after fielding ineligible player.

Speculation PSG interested in Evra.


Zeman says media misquoted him regarding De Rossi.

Preview to Serie A weekend.

La Liga

Casillas tells teammates it’s now or never.

“I thought it would be the last ball I would touch for a long time,” -Lionel Messi on his knee injury.


Cristian Nyari says this may be a breakthrough season for German clubs in Europe.

Why German teams have been so successful on the European stage lately.

Bit and Bobs

A review of European football in the papers.

The footballer that was: Paul Gascoigne.

Romario seeking a full investigation into Brazilian football confederation.

Sheer madness on the pitch: red cards, kicks, and feigning injuries.

Comments (7)

  1. If Real don’t pay Ronaldo, Perez is crazier than everybody already thought.

    Just imagine that team the past 4 seasons without Ronaldo. For all intents and purposes, Barca has been the best club over that span, but Real have been considered for at least the past 3 seasons as a team capable of stopping them – the ONLY team capable of stopping them. If you remove Ronaldo from that equation, this statement is untrue regardless of who you have in there instead.

    I don’t quite know why the Madridistas never took to him; perhaps they were simply tired of the constant signings of super-duper-stars that never delivered the coveted 10th European Cup they want so badly. But the man was adored in Manchester. To go from that to getting booed in the midst of scoring more than a goal per game? At a club that has at times actually outplayed Barcelona at times during his tenure there, particularly last season? That would make anybody feel like shit, regardless of status or income. He isn’t a perfect human being, but for everything he’s done for Real, he deserves better.

  2. United is packing their first team with stars?

    • Exactly what I thought. Take RVP out and what do you have? Some good to decent players and a few that make you scratch your head and wonder “why??”

      • Damn fat fingers. I meant to add “and some over rated ones that are only stars to the english media”

      • I guess it depends how you define “stars”. Top of the league ain’t so bad for a bunch of “head scratcher”.

        • I never said the whole team was bad players. I just disagreed with the premise of the article that ManU is made up the same way as Man City. I totally agree with the article as it refers to City.

          Fergie does what he always does. Takes what he can, buys some good players, brings in some kids and builds a team that can compete. It pains me to say that being an Arsenal supporter but full marks to Fergie.

          • You could debate the “star” quality of ManU players, but the main point of the article is that the Manchesters are similar in that they are teams of individuals that both lack strategic coherance – the point was NOT that “ManU is made up the same way as Man City”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *