The Lead

Last night, Sergio Agüero, an Argentinian forward formerly of Atletico Madrid, purchased from Independiente for €23 million and sold on to Manchester City for a ballpark sum of £35 million—the most expensive player in the club’s history—scored the winning goal for Manchester City. The club paid Agüero’s enormous transfer fee on the back of money provided by owner Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, the Deputy Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates. This money was generated in part by the Supreme Petroleum Council, the fourth largest oil and natural gas company on Earth. It sells its products to a global industry that is driven by fossil fuels, despite the major risk the product poses to the fragile global climate.

The game meanwhile was played against the likely Premier League title-winners Manchester United at the Nike Swoosh-adorned Old Trafford. United of course are owned by American businessman Malcolm Glazer. Glazer purchased the club on leveraged money in 2005, meaning much of the team revenue was initially directed to making substantial interest payments on Glazer’s borrowed cash. The Glazer family generated their wealth through property ownership, initially trailer parks in Florida in the 1970s. Malcolm Glazer made several failed corporate takeover attempts in the Reagan eighties and finally succeeded in purchasing the ailing Zapata Offshore company, which was a remaining subsidiary of Zapata, an oil and natural gas company established by President George H.W. Bush. From there Glazer invested in a host of various companies to generate a considerable fortune.

Both teams played to a global audience in the tens if not hundreds of millions, through satellite and digitial cable television stations which paid millions and in some cases billions of pounds, dollars, Euros for the privilege, money that is funneled back to both clubs and to the globally preferred Premier League. The money is recouped by the companies that paid for the rights in ad revenue from commercial spots for a host of products aimed at a lucrative young demographic, all produced via a globally integrated free-market fueled by petroleum products. It’s a closed circuit of wealth generation, money which is redirected back to stockholders, and to company employees, from manufacturers in the developing world to mid-level corporate executives in Western Europe and North America.

Needless to say, this system doesn’t make much a priority of the community history of a few clubs, nor the mere tens of thousands of fans who pay to see the clubs play in regions like Greater Manchester, or Yorkshire, or any of the economic areas which in many ways are still readjusting to the post-1980s, state-owned economy smashed to pieces by Margaret Thatcher during her time as Prime Minister (1979-90).

This, at least to me, is the real legacy of Thatcherism. It’s an intractable ideology, not an atomized historical moment. It involves more than the gentrification of English football which followed a complex chain of events stretching back to the ban on English clubs in Europe following the Heysel stadium crush in 1985. And more than the unjust treatment of all football fans in that same dark period which merely reflected Thatcher’s Tory hatred of the English working class, a group whom she referred to once as “the enemy within.”

Thatcher uprooted a Britain locked in a mixed economy which, for better or worse, perpetuated an industry that existed in large part to employ a work force rather than produce a lucrative good at market value. But Thatcherism—the ideology her approach to the trade unions and state-owned industry—only survived because it was cemented by the smiley-faced, pro-middle class New Labour politics of Tony Blair, a Prime Minister who helped ensure that global, wealth-obsessed neoliberal policy was signed off by history.

The legacy of Thatcher is only something we talk about because of Newcastle-loving Tony, much in the same way Reaganism survived in large part because of Bill Clinton’s Third Way approach, which generated enormous wealth for the middle class even as it further dismantled the New Deal welfare state. Apportioning blame or credit for the current global wealth-generating machine that is Modern Football goes far beyond slagging a Prime Minister who was last in office when Liverpool won their last first division title.

This is not meant to be a lecture on political science, but merely to point out that, it’s complicated. Thatcher may have directed history, her politics may have been an inevitable response to an inert 1970s, it may or may not have paved the way for the massively wealthy Premier League, which may or may not be the worst thing in the world. But she is not an independent agent.


Neville to part ways with Everton at the end of season.

Pulis has until the end of season to save Stoke from relegation.

Loic Remy a major target if QPR are relegated.

Mancini confident City will win back the title next year.


Parma’s Donadoni wants to one day coach a ‘big club’.

Cesar says he’s happy in Premier League, won’t return to Serie A.

La Liga

Malaga want to continue making history.

Sevilla’s European dreams still alive.


Neuer won’t rule out possibility of a shoot-out vs Juve.

An interview with former Schalke player Ebbe Sand.

Bit and Bobs

Why there won’t be a moment of silence for Thatcher at this weekend’s EPL games.

Footballer hit with pear in Sweden.

Thanks to Alima Hotakie for compiling today’s links.

Comments (7)

  1. I believe the song starts with Cake and Ice cream when…….

  2. The question on FB was “Should the Premier League hold a moment of silence for the former England prime minister? Why or why not?”

    I believe no, not out of respect or disrespect for Mrs Thatcher but because of the likely outcome at grounds, especially in northern England. Mrs T is still roundly despised in many northern communities who, rightly or wrongly, blame her for the economic dismantling of their home area. Notwithstanding political views, a resounding chorus of boos broadcast around the world would not reflect well on the individual clubs and the UK in general.

  3. It might be more accurate to say that the revenue is now coming more from pay TV subscriber fees than ads. ESPN in particular makes $7.3 BILLION in subscriber fees in the USA, compared to $3.3 billion in ad money, and a large portion of that comes from people who don’t even watch ESPN. Likewise, BT’s huge deal with the EPL in the UK will be recouped more from people buying in than advertisers trying to sell.

    But it’s still mostly powered by fossil fuels, of course.

  4. Cesar is happy in Premier League, practically saying he doesnt plan on going down to the Championship. I wonder if Arsene would be interested.

  5. Neither Margaret Thatcher nor her Conservative Party colleagues hated the English working class. Those whom they hated and whom Thatcher referred to as “the enemy within”, were the despicable, slimy union bosses who used the workers as weapons against the United Kingdom. Most if not all of them were out and out communists, opposed to democracy, and dedicated to the overthrow of democracy and freedom in the United Kingdom. To suggest that the UK would be better off as it was in 1979 is a complete denial of the facts and totally beyond sense. Jobs do not get created to give someone employment. They come into existence because there is a need to be fulfilled. The UK in 1979 had it exactly backwards and was completely unsustainable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *