Duane Rollins

duanerollins

Recent Posts

Independiente Argentina v Toronto FC

It hasn’t been the best couple of weeks for Toronto FC (or months, or years). With a win-less streak now stretching to eight games, and with just one win in its last 24 MLS games, the Reds are in danger of slipping even further into irrelevancy in the Toronto sports market.

For those that were around in the early years, it’s staggering to see the fall from grace. This was a club that wasn’t just the darling of the Toronto sports scene but for much of MLS for a while at the end of last decade. There wasn’t an empty seat in the stadium for almost three straight years, despite struggles on the pitch.

In fact, what seemed like “struggles” then were only a taste of what was to come. Little did TFC fans realize that those first three years would represent a high water mark for the club. They improved each of the first three seasons, finishing 2009 just one point from a playoff spot.

On the morning of October 24, 2009 Toronto FC was a middling team that was one win away from making its first playoff appearance. Fans had reason to hope.

Then, in a driving rainstorm, Macoumba Kandji scored for the New York Red Bulls just three minutes into the Reds’ final game of the year. New York, a club that was 21 points behind Toronto at kick-off, would go on to score four more goals that night to deny TFC a spot in the playoffs.

The enduring image of the night was interim head coach Chris Cummins standing on the sideline, shoulders slumped with rain pouring off his black trench coats. He didn’t even have the energy to shout instructions to his players any longer; his mind may have been on catching the first flight back to Heathrow.

Cummins remains the most successful of Toronto’s eight managers. The club has lost 52 times since that night, with only 21 wins. Along the way they have been forced to cut season ticket prices to year one levels and watched as a once vibrant and sold-out stadium turn into a cynical, often half-empty shell. What was once fan passion is now mostly anger. That is if the club is lucky. At least if the fans are angry they still care. Increasingly there is less anger.

So, what happened? How did Toronto FC become so very bad? It’s indeed puzzling, as the Reds have the financial resources to compete and ownership has invested in both players and infrastructure. Yet, the team just seems to get worse and worse.

The simple answer – and the answer most want to point to – is that the investor/owners in Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment don’t know what they’re doing. It’s increasingly difficult argument to challenge, even if it appears a tad simplistic. The truth is, there has been one consistent element to the club and that’s ownership.

What’s even more baffling about that is that, in isolation, most of the moves MLSE has made to support their franchise in that time made a lot of sense. In 2006, MLSE recognized that they didn’t know how to run a soccer team and so looked to hire a guy that had the experience they didn’t. In retrospect, hiring Mo Johnston as coach and eventually director of football was a terrible idea, but at the time it was pretty uncontroversial.

When it became clear that Johnston wasn’t the right guy for the job, MLSE reached out (and opened their pocket book) to one of the biggest names in the game in Jürgen Klinsmann to assist them in the search.

Few criticized MLSE’s hiring of Klinsmann. So, when he came back with the name of Aron Winter as the right man to bring TFC back from the dead, most fans were excited. After all, this was a guy that had played at the highest levels and was part of one of Europe’s most storied clubs.

Instead, things got worse. A lot worse. So MLSE listened to the prevailing advice of the day and sought out a “MLS guy” to run the show.

Enter Kevin Payne, an experienced manager from the club that was only associated with success in the league’s earliest days. Again, next to no one questioned the hire.

It’s too early to evaluate Payne, but not to point out his similarities with other MLSE hires. Payne was an attractive candidate; he combined brash talk with a long and impressive resume. When MLSE hires someone it almost always tends to be an industry name. You rarely see the company put its trust in an internal employee, or in allowing a young executive to grow in its role.

With MLSE style seems to matter more than substance. It plays better with fans and media, but, as history tells us, it rarely seems to work.

There is a certain arrogance in the philosophy. It suggests that Toronto is too big a market to be appropriate for an entry-level managerial candidate.

That might point to the biggest problem of all – arrogance. Despite two decades of losing, MLSE continues to believe that it is a major player in North American sports. It continues to make the same errors and it continues to get the same results.

And, all fans can do is hope against hope that they eventually will learn from their mistakes and bring the city a winner, and that hope is running thin. Worse, it’s turning into indifference.

2008 Pepsi MLS All-Star Game - West Ham United v MLS All-Stars

It’s not a new debate. In fact, it’s one of the oldest debates in world football. However, in Canada, fans and media are just now coming around to discuss it.

Since Canada didn’t have a separate national cup competition until six years ago, the debate about how to best balance league and cup competition has never been addressed. It has been now, with one high profile columnist for the Toronto Star, Cathal Kelly, lambasting the Amway Canadian Championship last week. Kelly called the event the most useless competition in Canadian sport and suggested that the teams didn’t really want to win it.

Understandably (and correctly) his column was attacked as being needlessly critical, inaccurate and provincial—it was written in such a way to make it seem like Canadian teams were unique in having to deal with the burden of parallel competitions. Additionally, anyone that saw the reaction of both players and fans last night in Montreal following the Impact’s 6-0 thrashing of TFC would instinctively understand that any notion of team’s not wanting to win is absurd.

It’s also unlikely that there will be many celebrations at TFC training today—extra running drills, perhaps, but no celebrations.

Few reading here need to understand this lesson, but it bears repeating: rotating a squad is not the same thing as not trying to win. The best clubs in the world take different approaches to different competitions and Canadian clubs should be no different. It should go without saying that a team can prioritize league play while at the same time giving younger/less used players a chance to prove themselves in the cup play.

That understanding also allows one to have a balanced discussion about whether a team has the right priorities. Should Montreal have dressed a mostly reserve side in the first leg against Toronto (with a win on Saturday and last night’s result the answer would seem to be yes)? Was Toronto right to let the kids mostly play in the cup this year (time will tell)?

Make no mistake, Toronto did not make the cup a priority this year. There had been rumblings since late last year that from top to bottom the organization understood that improving league play had to be priority No 1 in 2013 and, with that, a reluctant understanding that participation in the CONCACAF Champions League would make that more difficult.

To be very clear, saying that Toronto made the Canadian Championship a lesser aim in 2013 in no way justifies the 6-0 loss last night. Losing that heavily reflects poorly on the club and is a sign that the problems that have plagued TFC for years are far from being fixed. Put another way, Toronto likely loses yesterday even if they favoured the competition and they probably are bad in league play over the last four years even without CCL play.

But, CCL play made it worse—especially in 2010 when they were closer to a playoff spot than they were in 2011 or 2012. The disastrous start last year was at least partly because of the extra burden of playing four intense CCL games in a month. Evidence of the “CCL-effect” in MLS can be seen beyond Toronto. Of the four teams that have gone to the semi-finals or beyond in the last three seasons only one, this year’s Galaxy, the defending MLS Cup champions, have managed to play up to expectations in league play. Two of those four teams—Toronto and this year’s Seattle Sounders—were downright train wrecks in the league.
Which brings us back around to a point in Kelly’s article—is participating in the CCL worthwhile for MLS clubs? The answer isn’t as simple as many fans want to believe.

Yes, on a philosophical level, of course it is. If MLS wants to improve its standing in North America and the world it needs its teams competing internationally. Although the importance of the event is overstated by its fans, an appearance in the Club World Cup would be a significant step for the league.

The thing is the majority of MLS teams aren’t even close to good enough to compete against the top Mexican teams. Not when the Mexican teams put in a full effort, anyway. That fact essentially makes MLS CCL participation a mirage. They’re not really in the competition in a significant way, but participation in it does significantly put a drain on resources. Adding insult, participation in the tournament does very little to increase MLS teams’ profile in their home community. Few outside of the hardcore audience care—at all—about the tournament.

Over the last four years, Toronto has learned that lesson, which is why the club was more than happy to take a chance with younger players this time out. It’s hard to argue with their reasoning.

Canadau17s

Canada is going to the World Cup!

Okay, it’s the U17 World Cup, but considering that the last 12-months have seen Canada crash out of World Cup qualifying at the senior and U20 level, any success should be celebrated. It’s especially gratifying in that it will be Canada’s second consecutive appearance U17 World Cup.

The back-to-back trips come at a time when the influence of the professional academies is growing. Indeed, 13 members of the team come from a domestic professional environment, with 10 coming from either the Vancouver Whitecaps or Toronto FC academy.

Clearly, these teams have helped the program. After all, it had been 16-years between U17 World Cups for Canada prior to 2011.

Manager Sean Fleming directly pointed to this in a conference call following qualification.

“The credit is to the professional academies, and also the provincial programs and clubs,” he said. “Everything across the country is getting better.”

‘Getting better’ needs to be taken in context, of course. The recent failure of the U20 team tells us that there is still lots of improvement to be had.

Fleming alluded to that.

“We have to get (more) opportunities for these younger players. The 18-19-year-old age is still a difficult age for these kids to find spots,” he said.

“I still think we have to somehow better prepare them to play in MLS… We have to find those good competitive environments for the kids so they can continue to develop.”

And there’s the rub. Yes, Canadian soccer is doing some things right (finally), but there is still (as always) many, many problems. Too often in the past the Canadian program has been blinded by modest success, like qualifying for a youth World Cup, and has not been able to see the full picture.

The U17 World Cup is a wonderful learning experience for players. It puts them in a pressure situation and it also creates a patriotic bond between the players and the national program. However, it’s not an end goal.

Most of the world understands that. No one in Europe holds up U17 success to mean much more than what it is: yet-to-be-fulfilled promise. It’s unlikely that there are many in Switzerland celebrating their 2009 U17 title. If anyone there even thinks about it, it’s likely in the context of how it helped develop future club and country stars.

Closer to home, Mexico’s 2005 title is marked as the beginning of that country’s emergence as a contender beyond CONCACAF’s borders. Yet today only four players—Efrain Juarez, Hector Moreno, Giovani dos Santos and Carlos Vela—have more than 30 senior caps for the national team.

That’s actually a good turnover for an U17 team. If a country can produce three semi-regular and one regular (dos Santos, in this case) player per cycle, it’s laughing.

Of course in Mexico, we’re talking about the U17 World Cup champions. More importantly we’re talking about a country that has an established and wide-ranging academy system tied into its professional league, a league that operates within the worlds player market and makes considerable money selling its homegrown players to bigger leagues.

Canada meanwhile has three pro academies that often seem more interested in getting its players NCAA scholarships than they do in producing future professionals. The struggles of players like Russell Teibert or Doneil Henry to get playing time in MLS—or, more troubling, the struggles a player like Matt Stinson has in even finding a pro team—demonstrate just how big a hole there is n the Canadian pyramid.

A U17 run may be more sexy, but real hope in the game here will only be found by filling that hole. The biggest issue facing Canadian soccer today the lack of a stable league option for our academy graduates to flourish in when they aren’t quite ready for MLS, but too good to be in college soccer.

That isn’t to say you shouldn’t enjoy the current U17 team’s run in the upcoming World Cup. By all means, cheer them on and be excited for them. Just keep it in context.

The future success of Canadian soccer has little correlation with success in a two-week tournament in Panama.

93089022

As Canadians, we don’t like to get advice from our southern neighbours. It’s it bit irrational and a lot defensive, but it is what it is.

So, when Abby Wambach starts a campaign against the decision to play the 2015 World Cup (and, likely, the 2014 U20 World Cup) on field turf, we get our back up. Some might even be tempted to go the juvenile route of calling her “Abby Waaah-bach” and dismissing her complaints out of hand.

Here’s the thing though: she’s right. It is a shame that the Finals will be played on the plastic stuff, and the fact the CSA isn’t looking for alternative solutions does reflect poorly on this country as a host.

Spare us arguments about how turf is the wave of the future or that it won’t affect play. That’s simply not the case. Although, like any technology, this generation of turf is miles ahead of what we saw for the 2007 U20 men’s event, it’s still not the same thing as grass.

The ball will run longer and bounce higher. It will favour a more athletic game and will do nothing for the growth of women’s football, especially in Europe, where fans are already are reluctant to support the sport.
Read the rest of this entry »

100487951

Sports fans in Canada tend to be a tad bit on the provincial side. As with any generality, there are exceptions—and many readers here would fit that bill—but across the board, most Canadians follow sports that very few people outside of Canada follow.

If you were to walk into a café in Saskatoon and ask a fellow patron whether he saw “the double in-off take out last night at the Scotties” you’d get an animated response that likely would involve the term “the hammer.”

That same conversation (it’s about curling, by the way) would be met with blank stares in most of the rest of the world.

If a person turned to the passenger next to them on the subway in Toronto and said, “There can only ever be one Dougie, eh?”, there’s a good chance they’d respond with high-fives and talk about a 20-year-old overtime winner against the St. Louis Blues. In Mexico City, impromptu hockey talk would result in an empty seat beside you as the passenger moved slowly away from the unhinged tourist.

On the other hand, in Canada conversations about the how great Messi is are as likely to be met with the response “I prefer to keep things tidy” than “Barcelona is a special team, aren’t they?”
Read the rest of this entry »

canadau20

It wasn’t as dramatic as Canada’s mens national team losing 8-1 in Honduras in World Cup qualifying last October, but the recent failure of the Canadian men’s U20 side to advance to the World Cup in Turkey should cause fans as much concern as the disaster in San Pedro Sula.

It’s possible to look at the 8-1 loss and blame it on the mistakes of the past. The current group of senior national team players is a reflection of where Canadian soccer was 10 to 15 years ago, not where it is today. There have been changes at the Canadian Soccer Association and there do seem to be some positive signs.

However, that argument can’t be made about the U20s. Built from a core of players that did go to a World Cup as U17s two years ago, much was expected from this group. Instead, they limped home with a tepid 1-2 record.

Against Cuba the Canadians were out-muscled, and they played scared. Against the United States they were defeated in all aspects of the game.

Most troubling, this was a team that played without spirit and direction. There were rumblings about discontent in the camp and no one seemed all that broken up by the fact that they weren’t going to Turkey for the World Cup.
Read the rest of this entry »

100235930

Won’t someone please think of the children!

It’s the call of the most aggressive of opponents of the Canadian Soccer Associations’s Long-Term Player Development (LTPD) plan.

“We must protect the children from the creeping socialism of big government,” the anti-LTPD voice screams. “They are trying to bubble wrap kids from the harsh realities of life!”

One gets the vision of an angry, old man shaking his fist while sitting on a porch sipping lemonade.

“They’re making them soft,” he screams. “Soft, I tell you. That’s what’s wrong with this generation. They don’t understand what it’s like to earn their way.

“Life’s not a picnic,” the old man trails off. “Gotta toughen then up…”
Read the rest of this entry »