Archive for the ‘Canada’ Category

An Indian sadhu (Hindu holy man) poses w

It reads as follows:

FIFA Statement: FIFA letter to Canadian Soccer Association (CSA)

Following communication between the CSA and FIFA, the matter related to Law 4 – The Player’s Equipment, the use of head covers and the situation arisen within the CSA has been presented to the members of the International Football Association Board (IFAB) for discussion.

The IFAB has exceptionally agreed to extend the conditions of the current experiment previously approved by IFAB in October 2012 (as per FIFA circular no. 1322), and to allow male players in Canada to wear head covers as well, as long as the following conditions are respected:

The head cover must:

· be of the same colour as the jersey
· be in keeping with the professional appearance of the player’s equipment
· not be attached to the jersey
· not pose any danger to the player wearing it or any other player (e.g. opening/closing mechanism around neck)

The letter sent by FIFA to the CSA on 13 June 2013 authorises the CSA to permit all players to wear head covers as described above, in all areas and on all levels of the Canadian football community.

This matter will once again be discussed by the IFAB in October 2013, before a final decision is reached at the next Annual General Meeting of the IFAB, taking place in March 2014.

This presumably means FIFA will take action on the matter beginning this October. The pressure is now on the QSF to issue a response.

England v Belgium - International Friendly

Let’s start with a basic fact.

Denying soccer to a single child, whether black, white, brown, rich, poor, able bodied, disabled, English, French or otherwise is wrong.

Dead wrong. It is not debatable and it certainly shouldn’t be a talking point for political debate. Yet that’s what I has become in Quebec, where the QSF refuses to back down from a stance that the vast majority of people in Canada, Quebec and around the world find appalling.

The of the root of the conflict is as old as Canada – the French minority resisting directive from the English majority. And, many people are using the conflict to reopen 50-year-old conversations about sovereignty and federalism.

This is neither the right conflict to frame such debates, nor is a soccer specific website the right venue for such a conversation.

So we aren’t about to have one here. Not in the body if the article, nor, should we, in the comments that follow.

Rather, we’re going to stick to what’s relevant to this space and it’s readers: the football.

Specifically, what the conflict says about CSA reform and the possibility of its success.

In the Fall of 2007 about 500 people wore black t-shirts to a Canadian men’s friendly at Toronto’s BMO Field, emblazoned with the call to “Sack the CSA,” a call for governance reform within the Canadian Soccer Association (as full disclosure I took an active role in organizing the protest and assisting the main organizer, Dino Rossi, with media relations during the event).

It was the first grassroots expression of a long felt frustration with the CSA. It was widely believed that the organization was too regionally focused to the detriment of the nation as a whole.

Simply put, provincial (both meanings of the word) attitudes were holding Canadian soccer back. The provinces had all the power and so long as that was allowed to continue Canada would continue to struggle to compete internationally.

It took five years, but that was the beginning of the end for the old boys network of provincial cronyism ruining (no, not running) the game.

The CSA is now moving to a much more professional and centralized leadership structure. It is attempting to implement national standards such as the Long Term Player Development plan and, as we are seeing now, exerting control to ensure that the same standards are kept from coast to coast to coast in Canada.

They should have expected push back, and this is one instance.

You cannot take power away from groups that have literally never experienced federal control before and not expect resistance.

We are seeing it at the local level with resistance to aspects of the LTPD plan (which is a discussion for another day) and we are seeing it now from Quebec.

The message from Quebec is clear: We do not accept the idea that we should take directives from the federal body. The Quebec Soccer Federation believes that it should be allowed to make its own rules. The province was the only one to vote against governance reform candidates in the last CSA president election and they are using the turban ban as an opportunity to fight for a return to the bad old days of the tails wagging the dog in Canadian soccer.

They are betting that the CSA will back down and the erosion of federal power will begin. You can bet that there are some in other parts of the country that are cheering them on for their own selfish reasons.

The CSA appears to understand the importance of not backing down from the first major challenge to the centralization of power in Canadian soccer. By suspending the QSF they have demonstrated they mean business. In the past they likely would have thrown their hands up and let Quebec do its own thing (like it did when the same battle was fought -and lost- by Quebec over the hijab).

It’s likely that the QSF has underestimated the resolve of the CSA to maintain control. Regardless, the federation could not have chosen a worse hill to die on.

The CSA is on the side of history here. The world doesn’t much care about the petty regional politics if Canada. It does, however, care about religious discrimination.

The QSF will not win this fight. Quebec’s soccer governing body would be best to move on and work with the CSA to ensure that it is allowed to operate independently when it comes to issues that truly are unique to the province.

Fighting to keep Sikh children from playing the game isn’t a unique problem facing Quebec.

It’s just wrong.

134858116

The Lead

Ten days to say yes or no to turbans on the soccer fields of Quebec? Is there some sort of middle ground they’re trying to discover here? Is the QSF drawing up blueprints on acceptable dimensions for turbans? Furiously working behind the scenes on any possible legal angles to take against the CSA?

Or maybe this is just a last gasp at retaining dignity in the face of defeat. Kind of like how Canada waited a week to declare war after Great Britain in World War II in order to express its independence.

The story has gone international. The NY Times opened its story on the ban with this rather provocative sentence: “The newest intersection of soccer and cultural controversy has an unusual address — Canada.” Cultural controversy! Sovereignty! Pauline Marois wading into soccer governance rules she knows absolutely nothing about! Awooga! Defcon 5!

Let’s put aside the political hay-making for a moment (the less said on Joey Saputo’s pathetic excuse for a statement on the matter, the better) and look at the particulars. The Montreal Gazette has some interesting background on how we came to this point:

A member of the Quebec Soccer Federation suggested Tuesday that the decision taken almost two weeks ago to ban turbans from the game was rushed.

“I think it was poorly evaluated, and the way it was presented, and the speed with which it was presented — it was, I think, the last point on the agenda of the meeting of the board of directors — there are things in the way it was handled … that must be looked at again,” said Richard Gravel, director-general of the Association régionale de soccer de l’Outaouais.

The turban file was presented to the board of directors of the QFS by a member of the executive committee on the weekend of June 1-2. According to the QFS’s bylaws, the member of the executive committee did not have the right to make a recommendation — pro or con — about the turban ban. She was only allowed to present the file in a neutral manner, Gravel said.

So, in other words, a stupid bureaucratic quirk may have prevented the QSF board from weighing through all the possible consequences of the turban ban. They may have voted on it without being aware of FIFA’s specific stance on the issue. They may have voted on it without even being specifically aware of the CSA’s mandate on turbans, or that the CSA’s recent governance reforms required compliance from the provinces on the CSA’s national directives.

I’m willing to give the QSF board the benefit of the doubt here, even with Gravel’s admission that the vote carried “political and social aspects” specifically related to the notion of cultural integration (incredibly odd, since banning people from playing the global game simply based on their province of residence and their religious faith doesn’t seem to achieve that aim very well).

It might be best if we put the political overtones aside for the time being, until the QSF puts aside the “safety” excuse and comes clean on the vote. Otherwise the same politicians that haven’t done anything meaningful for the advance of soccer in this country will use our game as a means to divide us.
Read the rest of this entry »

I don’t think we’ve quite come to comprehend the seriousness of this allegation. Might be worth either pressing LeRoux more on this allegation for details, and scanning any available evidence. Perhaps FIFA might intervene?

If this is a spurious claim, LeRoux should face serious consequences.

The United States defeated Canada 3-0 at BMO field this afternoon. Two identical goals from superstar Alex Morgan were the difference. The first game between the North American rivals since that memorable affair at Old Trafford ended with controversy, depending on who you ask. Former Canadian-turned-American Sydney Leroux scored at the death–a meaningless goal–until she held up the badge and and shhhhed the crowd. While we should expect several columns from journalists who rarely cover the sport, if anything this might be the best thing to happen for this rivalry. It’s not like we need any added incentive to loathe our American friends, but hey, whatever works.

FBL-WC2014-QUALIFIERS-URUGUAY-PRESSER

The Lead

First, this:

So Suarez’s agent’s damage control was all for naught. This is happening. Remember kids: any less than 40 million pounds and LFC don’t know what they’re doing. And yes, it does seem the press did play a role:

Anyhoo, tis the season for friendlies! And while they don’t exactly lend themselves to white hot preview action as well as their competitive counterparts, there is always some grandiose theme to extrapolate out of the otherwise meaningless proceedings.

Over in Brazil for example, a judge called off a friendly that was to be held at Rio’s newly-renovated Maracana stadium. That is until her ruling was reversed:

However a statement on the Rio state government confirms the stadium complies with “all safety rules”.

The statement also confirmed the safety certificate was granted.

“All safety requirements for the friendly between Brazil and England have been complied with and, because of a bureaucratic failure, the appraisal from the public ministry that proves the compliance with the rules on safety at the Maracana have not been sent to Suderj,” the statement read.

Suderj is a division of the Rio de Janeiro state authority that holds responsibility for administrative issues with major sports venues.

Apparently these safety guarantees didn’t make it to the office responsible for approving sporting venues because of a “bureaucratic mistake.” And, make no mistake, this and the first person testimonials we’ll be seeing on Monday about the shoddy state of the place from England fans will be used to push an “Is Brazil Really Ready?” line.

As for the game itself, a bit of pish, a reason to look at Neymar, and whinge about two banks of four.

A little further north, Toronto’s slightly sturdier BMO Field will be the site of another, potentially more fiery rematch between the Canadian and American national women’s teams. They haven’t met since the epic 4-3 Olympic semifinal match in London, a game that still draws a bitter divides otherwise friendly soccer nations.

Equally bitter: fans of the Canadian mens team over the lavish attention paid to their more successful female counterparts? Perhaps, and there is some grumbling about a smaller pool of talented nations in women’s soccer flattering Canada. But fans of the program should put any sniping aside; Canadian soccer rarely enjoys this kind of attention, and the Canadian Soccer Association is milking it well.

The trick, as Duane Rollins wrote yesterday, would be to view this match as another opportunity to spur on a national development program, rather than a glorified back-slap. Attendant media would do well to ask Canada’s technical director and president what movements have been made to implement the recommendations for a division three national league.

Philadelphia Union v DC United - Disney Pro Soccer Classic

I’m not going to pretend I’m an expert on this, so I will point you in the direction of the work of Ben Rycroft (reporting) and Steve Sandor (explaining) on the recent efforts of the Canadian Soccer Association in pushing Major League Soccer recognize Canadian players as domestics and not internationals.

Why is this important? Because US teams have limited slots for international players, which leaves prospective Canadian players left to fight their way into one of three MLS sides here in Canada. The rest, at this point, are SOL unless they’re good enough to merit an international slot on a US team.

Sandor has a great take on the nature of the legal grey area on this issue, noting that USL Pro teams do, in fact, treat Canadian players on US teams as domestic players. Sandor writes that it’s unclear whether it’s truly a labour issue, particularly as the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission which covers labour equity told him it was a matter more appropriate for the Department of Immigration and Homeland security.

There are all sorts of interesting hypotheticals and quandaries in this, and Sandor touches on a few. I would only add this: I would strongly urge those who think opening up domestic slots for Canadian players on US MLS teams would promote player development here to think again. MLS is a the top tier professional league; it should be the repository of an already existing talent pool developed by a national curriculum and national league, neither of which Canada has yet to effectively implement. Without these, Canada is essentially any decent talents to move south of the border sooner than later. With that comes the threat of a talent-drain, which could have consequences for the national team.

Should MLS eventually change the rules, it would also be in the CSA’s best interests to work to possibly shrink or eliminate altogether the Canadian player quota on Canadian teams. The reason, as Sandor points out, is that Canadian players, if considered domestics in the US, could be used as bargaining chips by US teams, and sold above market value for desperate Canadian teams.

Anyway, things to think about…