
Game on at Wembley thanks to this insane goal from Demba Ba. Chelsea trails 2-1 with 15 minutes to play
Thanks to Timothy Burke for the gif
Update: Better angle. Also breaking: Chelsea lost.


Game on at Wembley thanks to this insane goal from Demba Ba. Chelsea trails 2-1 with 15 minutes to play
Thanks to Timothy Burke for the gif
Update: Better angle. Also breaking: Chelsea lost.

The Guardian’s Sachin Nakrani took the dramatic route when describing Chelsea’s 5-1 victory over Southampton today. Rather than focus on Demba Ba’s two goal debut, Nakrani chose to take a different track with his lede:
As Fernando Torres sat on the substitutes’ bench and watched Chelsea haul themselves back into this tie, he may well have felt his humiliation was complete. It took the Spaniard 14 games, 732 minutes to be precise, to score his first goal for Chelsea after his £50m transfer from Liverpool in January 2011, and here was Demba Ba requiring just 61 minutes to get two on his debut for the club.
Yes, yes — Fernando Torres is spiraling into depression. Read the rest of this entry »
The Lead
Amid the chorus of shrieking cats that is the transfer-mad English press is the lone, slightly sibilant voice of Michael Cox, plainly arguing his brief case against Mario Balotelli’s utility at Manchester City:
On paper, Balotelli might be more suited to a wide position. David Silva starts in one of the wide roles and inevitably drifts inside into the centre, and Nasri’s tendency to do something similar has been problematic on occasion, making City’s play too congested and allowing the opposition to defend narrow.
Balotelli offers directness and a goalscoring threat from wide, but in addition to his lack of defensive work, he simply never appears determined or motivated when fielded there. He’s a powerful runner with the ball, but his ability to beat a man is less assured.
Reading this, one remembers that Balotelli’s job does not primarily involve using public school urinals and being interviewed by Noel Gallagher, but scoring goals for a football club. It’s admittedly hard to tell, what with papers speculating over his team selection at City based not on tactical efficiency but rather on the success of his weekly spiritual counsel with Man City’s 22 year-old club chaplain, Reverend Peter Horlock.
It appears we’ve migrated pretty far from the idea that a player has a fairly static set of skills that can either be enhanced or undermined by good or bad management. Today, it’s purportedly far, far more complex. A forward must play in a specific part of the field (usually the middle, the precious, precious middle) or else they will be incapable of working their magic. They must have the exactly right assortment of team-mates versed in either horizontal or vertical styles of play to score goals. They must be in their right mind. They must be in the right city. They cannot be homesick. Their legs need constant care.
Andi Thomas touched on this subject today in his annoyingly brilliant way:
What should be the relatively simple business of transferring some paperwork in exchange for some promissory notes becomes a hellish entanglement of haggling with agents, representatives, hangers-on and passers-by. And what should be a relatively simple business of identifying a good player, and having him come and play well for you, is always, always, always a gamble.
Most footballers have an equivalent to Ba’s knee; it may not be as obvious to a medical, but they’re delicate creatures, and moving them to the wrong city or playing them in the wrong midfield can do just as much damage as an exploding kneecap.
The press, bless ‘em, seems only to be following the cues of both managers—keen to make excuses for the extended poor performance of an overpriced January acquisition—and players—Keen to do much the same, usually at the behest of their nervous, scummy agents.
Meanwhile, the idea that injuries may fall along an entirely random distribution from player to player, or that a good number players can adapt easily playing several metres to the left or right of their ‘comfort zone’, continues to evaporate into the mist.
Read the rest of this entry »
@newportcounty Can you therefore get the paperwork signed and sent to us so the move can be completed???
— Lincoln City FC (@LincolnCity_FC) January 2, 2013
The reaction from fans to this is particularly interesting, as they all unanimously called out Lincoln City for their ‘bush league’ approach to transfer negotiations. As ever, fans have made the mistake of assuming those connected to the club know anything more about these deals than the rest of us (and the less important mistake of thinking that lower league club chairmen don’t also man the official Twitter accounts).
Witness this nonsense about the Demba Ba ‘swap’ with Liverpool and Chelsea, wherein the Newcastle striker’s release clause was ‘triggered’ (KA-BOOM!) by Chelsea’s approach, which could mean a potential move to Stamford Bridge for £7 million.
Many LFC fans have noted this and subsequently remarked, ‘Hey, what the hell Brendan Rodgers, you could have had Ba for £5 million cheaper than that overpriced dingbat Sturridge!’
Which has prompted Tweets like this:
£12m (LFC fee for Sturridge) – £3.5m (CFC fee for Sturridge) – £1.8m (MCFC sell-on fee) = £6.7m profit — Demba Ba’s release clause is £7m.
— Matthew Alrick Brown (@alrickbrown) January 2, 2013
In any case, the Guardian notes that “Ba’s initial three-year contract was complicated in its structure.” To say the least. It also means this “release clause” could be limited to a handful of clubs, and maybe Liverpool wasn’t one of them? I’m just speculating.
The moral of the story here is the only people who know just what is going on during these transfer windows are player agents. Talk to them.