Archive for the ‘Premier League’ Category

162967564

Nice played Saint-Etienne on Saturday March 2, in a Ligue 1 game between two sides chasing the Champions League places but who would probably both settle for a Europa League spot. After 24 minutes, Nice’s Valentin Eysseric lunged late and dangerously into Saint-Etienne’s experienced midfielder Jeremy Clement, and the result was horrific.

As Clement fell to the ground in agony, his ankle fractured, TV pictures captured the bone at a right-angle as he struck the turf. It was horrendous, and Eysseric was quite rightly sent off. What happened next, though, was interesting and—given the ongoing saga following the challenge by Wigan’s Callum McManaman on Newcastle’s Masadio Haidara—instructive.

First of all, Clement was rushed to hospital and ruled out for six to eight months. Eysseric, 21 years old, sat in the dressing-room and felt sick. As soon as the game finished, he phoned Clement’s father and passed on his apologies. He took full blame for the injury, and told L’Equipe that he expected a long ban for his recklessness. That’s the thing about red cards in France; all carry one-match bans (the next match) and then get assessed and potentially extended depending on the severity of the incident.

Eysseric was eventually banned for 11 games (unlike most players, he turned up for his hearing), but by the time it was handed him, he had already formed an unlikely relationship with Clement. “I still feel guilty and the image of the ankle still haunts me,” Eysseric told L’Equipe. “But I felt better after speaking to Clement; he told me that the operation on the ankle had gone well, and he will be back playing football. Ultimately, he was the one who reassured me. I thought it was very classy of him. He must be mad at me, and this is normal, but he showed no sign if that.”

He also gave Eysseric a generous prognosis: the surgeon who operated on the ankle, Remi Philippot, had broken off his holidays to attend to the stricken player, but was not so confident. “It’s a serious injury, very serious, and his future [as a player] will depend on his ability to recuperate and other factors besides,” he told France Football. “We need to be honest, it’s serious and we can’t say for sure if he will be back or not. We will know more in three or four months.”

Eysseric visited Clement three days after the tackle; they spent an hour together in Saint-Etienne’s North Hospital, Room 329, and the Nice player brought in a box of cakes. “We are all human, dammit. The day we stop feeling for other people, we might as well all give up,” said Saint-Etienne’s emotional co-president Roland Romeyer during a teary interview with France Football the next Wednesday.

Now compare the reaction following the McManaman-Haidara challenge in England a fortnight ago. First of all, the resulting injury was nowhere near as serious as Clement’s, but the aftermath focused on whether McManaman would be banned or not. Surely not, boomed Wigan owner Dave Whelan: “The ball was there and McManaman got the ball as clean as a whistle, then followed through and they collided,” he said. “That’s an accident. There is not one ounce of malice.”

Coach Roberto Martinez said McManaman wanted to apologise to the player, but not before clearing his name. “It’s nothing malicious, he’s not that sort of boy. It’s the normal enthusiasm that you get in your debut… If Callum hasn’t apologised yet then he definitely will do that because we’re a football club where those values are very important.”

Haidara has since said he thought his career might have ended, and was surprised that there was no retrospective action taken. "You must protect players. This type of tackle cannot be condoned. The authorities must take action,” he told Le Parisien. “He could have ended my career and ruined my whole life and he will play again before me—ridiculous!”

No action was taken because referee Mark Halsey had seen the incident. Halsey, you may remember, was also in charge when Marouane Fellaini got away with head-butting his marker Ryan Shawcross during a game against Stoke, and subsequently elbowed and slapped the same player on two separate occasions. Halsey missed it, so that time Fellaini was given a retrospective three-match ban.

The FA has been roundly criticised for its stance on this issue, but for once, I have some sympathy with the governing body. I think that the FA would be open to a new red-card regulation, whereby every red card carried a one-match ban and was then subject to further punishment depending on the severity of the incident. If one player were to be shown a second yellow for slapping someone’s cheek, that might just be one game out; if someone else broke a player’s leg and ruled him out for the season, that could be eight games out. The Premier League clubs, whose players have more to lose, are the ones more likely to reject the proposal. And as new FA chairman Greg Dyke is soon to find out, the Premier League wags the tail of the FA more often than the other way around.

Looking at the sensible manner in which the Eysseric-Clement situation played out, it’s hard not to think that a similar system would make sense in England.

> on October 4, 2011 in Portsmouth, England.

The Lead

The Premier League is rich, but they don’t want to spread the love. That’s the story the Guardian ran with this morning in light of record earnings from TV rights deals:

With the Premier League close to finalising a record £5.5bn windfall in broadcasting income, MPs have also warned of this being soaked up by a “culture of greed” at the top of the game and called for the money to be shared more widely to benefit the grassroots and fans’ organisations.

The blockbuster TV deal, fuelled by the emergence of BT as a rival to BSkyB for domestic live rights and the continued growth of overseas income, has reignited a fierce debate across football and Westminster about how the cash should be shared and how far the Premier League’s responsibilities to the wider game should go. Some MPs have called for a minimum of 7.5% of the total income to be distributed to the grassroots, while others have called for a new funding formula that disaggregates the distribution of cash from the three-year cycle of TV deals to provide greater certainty.

There is another discussion to be had out of all this, and that’s the prospect that the TV rights juggernaut may not simply continue on as is forever. When that drop occurs, those smaller groups that rely on the good graces of the top flight are almost certain to take the most damage first.

Sports on TV is more coveted than ever with instant streaming TV and PVRs and downloadable episodes on iTunes etc., football matches happen at an appointed time and place. You have to watch them live by their very nature. This makes them very attractive to TV networks in search of a dwindling younger audience desired by traditional advertisers.

However this does not make TV immune to the growth and improvement of high speed internet cables, which continue to make the prospect of watching games via the Internet more and more palatable. And as the price of TV sports packages increases, more people will turn to alternate sources—including more affordable online subscriptions—to consume football.

Those margins are smaller than those offered by TV, but that TV audience is certain to shrink over time. Moreover, the growth of Instant TV will cause overall TV audiences to drop in the next several decades. That includes those who might have purchased a PL TV rights package had they kept their cable subscription.

I’m just saying, if I’m an investor playing the long game, football on TV seems like a great short term buy. But those hoping to reap the rewards for years to come should take pause.
Read the rest of this entry »

84673173

The gist:

Long-Term Sustainability Regulation

From the 2013/14 season Premier League clubs cannot make a loss in excess of £105m aggregated across seasons 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16.
Any club that makes a loss up to that limit will be subject to a tighter regulatory regime that includes:
- Secure owner funding for three years ahead
- Increased future financial information over the next three seasons.

Short-Term Cost Control Measure

Premier League clubs are restricted in terms the amount of increased PL Central Funds that can be used to increase current player wage costs to the tune of:
2013/14: £4m
2014/14: £8m
2015/16: £12m

The Short Term Cost Control measure applies only to clubs with a player wage bill in excess of £52m in 2012/13, £56m in 2014/15 and £60m in 2015/16.

That roughly means clubs can’t run up losses of more than £105m over three seasons. That’s 35 million per season. Which, if one considers the average losses of most Premier League clubs not named Manchester City, is weak tea indeed. The Short-Term cost control measure is a little better, as it prevents excessively rewarding the financial “winners.”

Stay-tuned for Martin Samuel-esque outrage updates…

UPDATE: Apparently the penalty for breaching the rules involves points deductions.

This doesn’t mean much for us in Canadia perhaps, but the rumours are that beIN Sport are planning to run away with the whole thing, pending whatever NBCU has up their sleeve. Fox, as Grant Wahl points out, still have significant foothold in some very durable properties, but ESPN? For all their work and investment, have been left with nothing.

As for the Premier League, it’s clear all they want is their giant bag of money. beIN Sport still has the potential to be a) a professional operation and b) watchable, and hopefully will be by the time their deal with the Premier League kicks in. Otherwise, I’m with you my American brothers and sisters.

By Andi Thomas & Alex Netherton

Tony Pulis is a strange creature. He’s a grown man that chooses to wear a baseball cap, a football manager who seems to hate football, and, as we’re finding out after his Stoke side went and Stoked at Liverpool for ninety goalless, lightless, hopeless minutes of drudgery and pain, something of a moralist.

This week’s instalment of the Luis Suárez’s one-man mission to keep football comment writers in work was an admirably innovative slice of simulation. Following a straightforward stumble, with three defenders standing around at a respectful distance, he Buckaroo’d all four of his limbs out and bellyflopped to the floor, face turned plaintively toward the referee. A nation fell about in laughter. Even the defenders were too amused to be cross. But not Righteous Tony. “I’ve been on about and banging the drum about people who fall over,” he said, a trifle confusingly. “It’s an embarrassment. The FA should be looking at this.”

However, our brave Defender of the Soul of Football has been notably quiet on an earlier incident, a meeting between the ribcage of Suárez and the right foot of Teutonic flesh-golem Robert Huth. Perhaps the Uruguayan could claim that the shock of not being kicked provoked some kind of spasm. Certainly Pulis, who ducked out of a press conference rather than discuss Huth’s Huthings, is guilty of being a little inconsistent when it comes to what players should and shouldn’t be up to. Earlier in the season, when Peter Crouch handled the ball into Manchester City’s net, Pulis thought it was “brilliant” that they’d “got away with it” against a “bigger club”; now he’s begrudging a team from the lower reaches their own moment of opportunist chicanery.

He’s not alone in his contradictions, though. Over at Newcastle Alan Pardew has called for the FA to look at whether Robin van Persie’s elbow did naughty things to Yohan Cabaye’s face, but has completely passed over Cheick Tioté’s improvised soft-shoe shuffle on Tom Cleverley’s lower leg. And last week, a nation watched in horror as Alex Ferguson, smarting from a first-half spanking by a team with an actual midfield, had the gall to suggest that added time wasn’t being added in sufficient amounts.

Managerial hypocrisy is back, baby! And it never, ever, ever went away.
Read the rest of this entry »

By Alex Netherton & Andi Thomas

In the same way that some television series are tedious until a flurry of excitement in the last few episodes, the Premier League gave nothing interesting in the slightest this weekend. It was the same series taken to the next logical step. Nothing that wasn’t on the cards occurred. This is it, this is happening, and due to contractual arrangements, several hundred words will follow on the same plots with the same people. Let’s all say it together: I love football journalism. I love that the internet has no space constrictions.

Manchester United in falling behind and coming back strongly but not quite winning shocker!!!

As ever in the Premier League, Manchester United started badly. They went 2-0 down to an impressive Tottenham Hotspur. Could we see it coming? Yes. Manchester United have the players to make sure that they can score when necessary. They have the lack of heart meaning they rarely start a game well. They have a lack of technical midfield players able to keep the ball under pressure. They have a manager who can administer the mother of all bollockings to improve a second half performance. Spurs, for their part, have been improving under the increasingly competent Andre Villas Boas. They have Gareth Bale who plays best when he’s got an audience. They have a midfield that presses its opponents, and they have a degree of self-belief. Was this inevitable? More or less. Hoo-rah.

Arsenal in losing to a top four team and showing signs of ability scandal!!!

Could we see it coming? Yes. Arsenal played with Gervinho up front. This is of course very, very funny, but it’s been signposted for a year that he is not a striker who thrives on his own up front. He didn’t in France—though he was very good—so there was no reason to think he would now. Chelsea have a surfeit of creativity, and are still physically dominant over most Premier League sides, and have some ridiculously expensive new players. Arsenal have a lot of average defenders who are either not ready for the Premier League or never will be. They have a culture of defeat that has not been expunged. Was this inevitable? More or less. Hoo-rah.
Read the rest of this entry »