Archive for the ‘Keith Law’ Category

klawdredd

Let’s go back in time a little bit for a moment here. Back to the magical post trade-deadline world of last Friday, where everything was possible and the world cared as much about BioGenesis as… well, probably about as little as it does right now. Because there were a bunch of Jays-related tidbits in Keith Law’s chat with readers over at ESPN.com back then, and like Arthur Crandall, I’m thinking that if I slap them together here, then go on and start editing this week’s Griff Bag, that outta hold the little S.O.B.’s.

So, without further ado…

Jim (Hartford, CT)
What’s up with Aaron Sanchez (not 100%, command issues)?
Klaw
Minor non-arm issues this year, most recently a blister he tried to pitch through. He’ll be fine.

Ahhh. Well that sure makes up for the dispiriting tweet from Jim Callis that I noted in my Assorted Weekend Thoughts post this morning. (To wit: “Toronto may rue the R.A. Dickey trade … more than the Giants regret the Carlos Beltran deal.”)

Tom (Spain)
What seems to be the difference for Teheran this year? Last year he seemed to regress, but has been among the best rookie pitchers this year.
Klaw
He started throwing this short 80-83 mph slider in mid-May – Bloomberg’s data shows no sliders before 5/14 – and it’s been very effective, a little bigger than a cutter, but short enough that he’s been able to throw it for strikes. All he ever really needed was a third pitch – that and a catcher who’d call his freaking changeup now and then – and now he’s justifying all those high rankings I gave him.

He’s a good example of how Noah Syndergaard could fulfill his potential, although in his case the curve is well ahead of the slider.

Oh FFS. SHOULDN’T SYNDERGAARD BE A RELIEVER BY NOW!!

Read the rest of this entry »

klawmoses

There were a couple of rather interesting Jays-related tidbits in today’s Keith Law chat over at ESPN.com, and since there’s a little bit of a party going on in the office at the moment, I’m… uh… I’m just going to go ahead and pass those along here, since it probably behooves me to do at least a little more work before calling it a day (apart from the Game Threat, that is)…

Bret (Toronto)
Hey Keith, I know you saw Marcus Stroman last weekend. What were your thoughts?
Klaw
I did indeed, and apologize for failing to turn it into a post. He was good, but I’m quite convinced now that he’s a reliever down the road. He had some more life on his fastball than he did in college, but still isn’t missing enough bats with it – he misses bats with the slider, and the changeup will eventually do that for him as well, but between his height and the contact on the heater, I think he’s a future closer or setup man.

If the Jays are smart enough to trade some of their relievers – Janssen and Cecil jump out as obvious candidates – there will be a spot for Stroman soon enough.

The last part here sounds pretty bang on… unless you can convince some team that Stroman is a starter and trade him. I still kinda see him– or Sean Nolin– as the Zach Stewart element of the potential 2013 edition of the Colby Rasmus trade. Darren Oliver is then Octavio Dotel. Rajai Davis is Corey Patterson. Delabar, Janssen, or Cecil are Jason Frasor. Shit, maybe even Aaron Loup is Marc Rzepczynski. Turn all that into a quality MLB ready infielder or a rotation piece that you can actually count on to be an above-average three or better in 2014? Damn right you do that. Is it possible? That’s what AA gets paid for, isn’t it?

Read the rest of this entry »

Rowdy-Tellez

Me a bad athlete? ME?? A bad athlete??? I just… I’ll have him eaten for that! By me. After brunch.

Once again this week, after the release of his mid-season top prospects list, which we discussed in the previous post, it seems a worthy venture to once again lay down some Law, as there were a few Jays-related tidbits in today’s Keith Law chat with readers at ESPN.com.

As always, I have not read any of Griffin’s answers.

Erich (CT)
How do you project AJ Jimenez’s future in the majors? Average regular? Star? I ask because I cant take Arencibia behind the plate anymore.
Klaw
Backup.

This seems, generally, to be the take on Jimenez. Kiley McDaniel tweeted the same sentiment yesterday, as well. However, at Baseball Prospectus, Jason Parks had a different take– albeit, with a caveat:

I thought his batting practice was outstanding, as he showed off more power than I expected, sending rockets to the pull side and making the “sound” off the ball that I originally confused for another player. I like the bat a lot. The glove was good, but the arm action on the throws was long and the throws lacked zip. Limited sample.

Works for me, so… I’m just going to go ahead and believe the guy who’s telling me what I want to hear.

Speaking of what I want to hear, this isn’t it:

Read the rest of this entry »

klawdredd

We haven’t done this in a while, but it’s Friday and there were a number of Jays-related tidbits in yesterday’s chat between Keith Law and his readers at ESPN.com, so… uh… yeah. Let’s lay down some law!

Bret (Toronto)
I know you were never a big Bickford fan, but if the Jays don’t sign him, that would have to leave them with the worst draft relative to what was available to them, no?
Klaw
Possibly – I haven’t looked at all of the classes now that we’re almost done with signings, but they will probably leave without a true first-round talent. By the way, I want to reiterate what I said on Twitter: The Jays have NOT specified or ruled out any reason for their failure to come to an agreement with Bickford. It could have been money, medicals, a change of heart by the player, or something unexpected. We just do not know.

James (WV )
What is up with the Jays? How could they pass on talents like Shipley, Peterson, and Renfroe to take Bickford, without being 100% sure that he would sign? Is AA’s job in trouble? Between this, the Jays season, and the Dickey trade, he’s had a bad year..If they finish below .500 is he toast?
Klaw
You’re making a large assumption that they weren’t 100% sure he would sign. What if he agreed to a number and then changed his mind? Would you reward that by paying the player more, thus signaling to all agents and players that you will cave if challenged in that way?

Hard to disagree with anything here. Mike Wilner touches on the Bickford situation in a post up at Sportsnet, noting that at the bare minimum the Jays will have made an offer of $1.2-million– because clubs need to have offered 40% of slot in order to get a compensation pick the next year. Interestingly, that’s exactly the percentage of slot second rounder Clinton Hollon signed for– though, assuming there’s nothing wrong with Bickford’s arm, I’d have to believe they offered even more. Whatever the number, Law agrees with a real sharp cookie on Twitter about the whole mess:

Read the rest of this entry »

klawmoses

There are all kinds of interesting reactions to last night’s selections by the Jays of prep arms Phil Bickford and Clinton Hollon with the tenth and forty-seventh picks in the 2013 Rule 4 draft respectively, but since I’m lazy and spent way too much time digesting today’s roster moves, let’s just focus on what all Keith Law, who was a fan of neither pick, had to say.

Eschewing the concept of “winners” and “losers” that just doesn’t make sense given the vast uncertainty surrounding all things to do with the draft and how far off we are from realistically being able to call anything a losing pick, Law posted a piece in the early morning hours revealing his “Winners and questions” at ESPN.com (Insider Only). The Jays were one of the questions.

Law has been clear all along about his issues with Bickford and his lack of secondary stuff, as I noted in yesterday’s Draft Day Primer post. He takes issue with the selection of second rounder, Kentucky high schooler Clinton Hollon, as well, explaining that he “has first-round stuff but not command or control and has had arm trouble that wiped out most of last summer.”

Perhaps even more troubling, in the “Winners and questions” post, Law tells us that “both kids also earned negative makeup comments from scouts with whom I spoke.” So… perhaps they took a deep look into Clinton Hollon’s (apparent) Twitter feed. Ugh.

Read the rest of this entry »

klawdredd

KLaw Week continues over at ESPN.com, and this afternoon Keith has had his second of two chats with readers in the wake of the release of his Top 100 prospects list, and all the goodies that go with it. So, here are all the Jays-related nuggets from both Tuesday’s chat and today’s chat– but, of course, all the non-Jays stuff is gold too, so you should probably check them both out in full. I mean… what else are you going to do? It’s damn February.

Kyle (Toronto)
Noticed Syndergaard was ranked relatively low on your list compared to most top prospects list, reasons?
Klaw
Those other lists are wrong, obviously.

Ben (Leland Grove)
Why did James Paxton miss out?
Klaw
Poor command, lack of an average third pitch, walked a man every other inning as a 23-year-old in AA.

Read the rest of this entry »

stromantwitter

Not Keith Law

Keith Law week continues, as today at ESPN.com (Insider Only) he’s revealed his top ten prospects for each club in the American League. As we learned earlier in the week, the Jays currently have the 24th best system in baseball, in Law’s estimation, with just two players– Aaron Sanchez (19) and Roberto Osuna (87)– among the top 100 prospects in the game. Following behind them in the Jays organization is Marcus Stroman (above), the PED-suspended 2012 draftee who Law, like many others, says could pitch in the Jays’ bullpen this season if they wanted him to (though the Jays seem to want to give Stroman the chance to fail as a starter first, before moving him to the ‘pen permanently).

We’re told this in a new section of Law’s organizational reports, in which he briefly looks at “any prospects (top 10 and beyond) who might help the major-league team this year.” Along with Stroman, he suggests that John Stilson– who is a candidate to pitch permanently in relief, because he “has a SLAP lesion in his shoulder and a violent delivery that won’t hold up in a starting role”– Sean Nolin and HELLO KEVIN PILLAR!!! may see some time in the show this season.

Read the rest of this entry »