Chris Lund

chrislund

Chris is one of the founders of Always OUA and currently a web editor at theScore. He was the editor of theScore's University Rush blog during the 2011 season. His work can be found at The Hockey News, The Hardball Times and JaysProspects.com and whatever other projects he has roped himself into.

Recent Posts

Here’s your rundown of the Olympics events you need to watch today. (All times Eastern)

Athletics

Three Canadians will look for a medal in the Men’s Marathon as Reid Coolsaet, Eric Gillis and Dylan Wykes will compete at 6 am.

Basketball

Argentina and Russia will duke it out for the bronze medal at 6 am, but the eyes will be on the gold medal game at 10 am. Will the United States continue to roll or can Spain pull off the upset? Stay tuned.

Boxing

Finals will be going in the Men’s Fly, Men’s Light, Men’s Welter, Men’s Light Heavy, Men’s Super Heavy all morning.

Cycling – Mountain Bike

The men’s cross-country final at 8:30 has two Canadians in the field as Max Plaxton and Geoff Kabush will take part in line up 3.

Handball

The men’s medal matches take place at 6 am with the bronze up for grabs between Croatia and Hungary, while Sweden and France will play for the gold at 10 am.

Volleyball

Bulgaria and Italy will be playing for the bronze medal at 4:30 am with Russia and Brazil playing for gold at 10 am.

Water Polo

Medal matches go at 9:30 am when Montenegro plays Serbia for bronze. Croatia will take on Italy at 10:50 am for gold.

Wrestling

Canada’s Haislan Veranes Garcia takes on Haitem Ben Alayech of Turkey at 3:30 am in the men’s 66kg freestyle qualifiers. In the men’s 96kg Canadian Khetav Pliev will take on Javier Cortina Lacerra of Cuba at 4:15 am.

 

For a full list of the events going on today, click here for the London 2012 Official Olympic Schedule

 

The closing ceremonies kick off at 4:00 pm. You should watch them, even though there are no medals handed out.

Why don’t we get the fun stuff out of the way first, shall we?

Jamaica is the owner of the greatest sprinting team in the history of time. One day that will change, but until then we have to be in awe of what they have put together.

In case you weren’t familiar with the cast of characters: Nesta Carter, the Jamaican lead runner, is one of five men in the history of time to run the 100m dash in under 9.8 seconds. You didn’t see him in the individual 100m race because he didn’t qualify, three Jamaicans ran three faster qualifying times before the games. Think about that.

Michael Frater is probably the least decorated of the four Jamaican relay sprinters. His personal best in the 100m is 9.88 seconds in 2011, despite suffering a ruptured knee ligament in 2010. Asafa Powell, the Jamaican sprinting legend, lost his spot on the 4×100 team to Frater. Powell is not an easy man to knock off, but Frater did.

Yohan Blake needs no introduction at this point. He is beastly; the second best runner in the world. Any country would love to have him as a runner. The only reason he is not the face of Jamaican sprinting is because there’s a pretty quick whippersnapper in front of him.

Usain Bolt is the fastest man in the history of the world. He is, in many ways, the face of the Olympic games and personally accounts for 35% of Jamaica’s gold medals at the Olympics. He is, by his own admission, a legend.

These four destroyed the world record today by three tenths of a second with a time of 36.85. They are monsters on the track, and you can’t take away from what they have done. They are the greatest ever and it’s officially not very close.

The United States, to their credit, ran well but, to bring in a useful American sporting analogy, they are the Utah Jazz to Jordan’s Bulls. Filled with greats, just not capable of winning the big one while the heavyweight Jamaicans are on top. It’s not easy, but you could do worse.

The Americans were second today by a fair margin and tied the previous world record of 37.04. Stockton and Malone understand how you feel.

If you can find somewhere to watch this race and you haven’t already, do it and let your jaw drop. These are fast men.

That’s the fun part.

***

Canada came into the relay final as a medal hope. They posted a good time in qualifying and were granted the good fortune of a Great Britain disqualification to earn their spot in the final. The best relay team since Atlanta 1996 had been assembled and it was conceivable, based on qualifying performance at least, that Canada would earn themselves a medal.

They didn’t disappoint. With Jamaica and the USA in a clear fight for first and second — a fight which turned into more of a beatdown when the anchor hand off occurred — Canada made their move. Justyn Warner ran an electric final leg, bringing the Canadians from fifth to third where they crossed the line. The board showed quite clearly for the world what happened.

Bronze. Canada. They did it. They had their moment.

The time, as we all know, did not stand. Team captain Jared Connaughton stepped on the inside line during his handoff which was recorded as a line violation. Canada was disqualified. Trinidad and Tobago have bronze medals now, and Canada is left with the memory of their name being lit up with disqualification lights.

Then the tone changed.

We, as a nation jumping up and down, went from exuberant to heartbroken in a matter of seconds. They were disqualified? Why? How? Answers weren’t readily apparent, but eventually came to light. Reality set in. No medal for the first track performance to bring us out of our seats in 16 years.

From admiring a spectacular performance to wallowing in pity. According to many, crying in a flag became the adopted symbol of our London 2012 campaign. That’s the memory we took away from this moment, from these games: Falling short for country. The reaction was an embarrassment only made worse by the decision to parade four sprinters — four sprinters who had just come up an executive decision short of their dream — in front of a camera and ask the deep questions: “How does it feel to win a medal and have it taken away?” while someone in a truck preps a montage of tears and muzak for the roll into commercials.

How does it feel? It feels terrible. If that’s all you can come up with, perhaps you shouldn’t be asking questions. “What’s your perfect Sunday?” would have more apt given that tomorrow is Sunday and the disqualification happened on Saturday night.

We don’t give a damn who stepped on that line. We don’t need to hear them try and verbalize how gutted they are. We sure as hell don’t need a half-witted montage cataloging tears in a vague effort to convey the cruelty of sport. We saw, we know, we felt it. Every single one of us did.

Canada not winning a medal changes absolutely nothing about that race. They ran the third fastest time in a final featuring the eight fastest countries in the world. They electrified us for 30 seconds. They had us overjoyed in an event where we hadn’t been an issue for nearly 20 years.

A foot on a line changes none of those things. It may result in a disqualification, but the moment is unchanged, only the memory is.

Jared Connaughton isn’t a hero because he went in front of a camera and apologized for stepping on a line. He’s a hero because he is the team captain of Canada’s 4x100m relay team who were, medal or no medal, the third fastest relay team in the final heat. He’s a hero because Gavin Smellie, Oluseyi Smith, and Justyn Warner are heroes. They’re heroes because they brought us out of our seats and made us even more proud — if that’s possible — to be Canadian.

They were at that moment and that’s how they should stand in our memory.

Canadian track is coming back, and when it does, you’ll have Smellie, Smyth, Connaughton and Warner to thank for getting the wheels in motion by getting us out of our seats.

They owe us nothing, let alone an apology.

The 2012 Olympics have been interesting in a way unique to the games as a whole. In essence, it has been the first games with widespread attention focused on the social media side of things. Athletes have regularly updated twitter accounts and Facebook pages, interact with fans and celebrate wins online. As such, tracking their influence has become an interesting side project for many Olympic viewers.

The above graph, per Darren Rovell of ESPN, tracks social media growth over the course of the games.

It’s a bit funny to track this by percentiles as you’ll note that both Usain Bolt and Michael Phelps took on over 1,000,000 followers on twitter but had a relatively miniscule percentage of growth because their follower bases were so big to begin with. Conversely, it makes sense that Olympic darlings Gabby Douglas and Missy Franklin would see the biggest rise in followers as their stars have risen dramatically.

No Canadians made the official Wall Street Journal list that Rovell tweeted, but there’s no doubt that they saw a distinct growth in followship as well.

They have the internet on computers now. Who knew?

Mexico captured their first ever soccer gold medal at the Olympics today as they knocked off Brazil in the finals. Prior to this gold medal, Mexico’s best finish was a fourth place in 1968. Brazil appeared in the final for the first time since 1988 and matched the country’s best finish at the Olympics with their third silver (1984, 1988).

Some may find Brazil’s Olympic record vs. their World Cup record to lack congruity, which is technically true, but Mexico is no slouch and actually has a winning record against the Brazilians in this millennium with six wins, four losses and two draws.

For a breakdown of all the action, Kristian Jack has you covered with one of his stellar match reports at The Footy Blog.

Did you know Canada means ‘Bronze’ in Elvish? Probably not, because I just made that up but the sentiment is there. Given that fake definition, Mark de Jonge certainly refused to be anti-Canadian on Saturday morning as he paddled his way to a bronze medal in the K1 200m Canoe Sprint which required photo review to confirm the final standings.

Upon that further review, de Jonge’s time of 36.657 seconds was good enough to net him a medal after a fascinating training period leading up to the games.

De Jonge dropped out of the Canadian program after he didn’t qualify for the Beijing games as a member of the K4 500m team and left to pursue his career in civil engineering. When the Olympics changed the sprint event from the 500m to the 200m de Jonge, a sprint specialist, took a leave of absence from his job to give the games one last kick at the can.

Here we are with medal in tow.

For those of you who like to count things, the bronze from de Jonge gives Canada 18 medals at the London games, putting them even with the medal count at Beijing 2008. The kicker there, of course, is that Canada had three gold medals in Beijing which isn’t a ton, but still three times as many as they do in London.

Conventional logic, which was conveniently invoked at the Vancouver games in 2010 when Canada had a bucketload of golds, is that the country with the most golds has won the medal count. This may make some graphs you see in coming days inaccurate, but we’re flexible with self-evaluation.

If bronze ever becomes the most valuable metal on earth, Canadians will be lighting cigars with money for a long time after London 2012.

Here’s your rundown of the Olympics events you need to watch today. (All times Eastern)

Athletics

Rachel Seaman will look to bring Canada a medal in the 20km Race Walk competition at noon. Cameron Levins goes in the men’s 5000m competition at 2:30pm. Canada will also look for team glory in the 4x100m relay after posting the third fastest qualifying time.

Basketball

The women’s medals will be handed out on Saturday as Russia and Australia duke it out for Bronze at noon while the US and France will fight over the Gold at 4:00 pm.

Boxing

The golds will be handed out in the Light Fly, Bantam, Light Welter, Middle, Heavy divisions throughout the afternoon.

Canoe Sprint

Canada will be looking for more Canoe Sprint medals as Mark de Jonge will go in the K1 200m at 4:30 am, while the team of Ryan Cochrane and Hugues Fournel will race in the K2 200m at 5:41 am.

Cycling – Mountain Bike

Catherine Pendrel and Emily Batty will be racing for Canada in the women’s cross-country event at 7:30 am.

Diving

The 10m platform final takes place at 3:30 pm.

Football

The men’s football gold medal match takes place between Brazil and Mexico at 10 am.

Handball

The women’s Gold medal match takes place between Norway and Montenegro at 3:30 pm.

Taekwondo

Francois Coulombe-Fortier will fight for Canada in the +80kg competition preliminary round at 7:45 am.

Volleyball

Women’s volleyball medals get handed out on Saturday. Japan takes on Korea at 6:30 am for the Bronze while Brazil and the USA play for Gold at 1:30 pm.

Wrestling

Arjan Bhullar will wrestle at 8:45 am against Komeil Ghasemi of Iran in the 120kg freestyle 1/8 finals.

 

For a full list of the events going on today, click here for the London 2012 Official Olympic Schedule

The Olympic party times will roll on for a few more athletes who have their events done at the games and you can expect phenomenal shenanigans to ensue. We already looked at the antics of Australian rower Joshua Booth who was sent home early from the games for an alcohol fueled rampage and here we are again.

Well, Booth may have been outdone.

Belgian cyclist Gijs Van Hoecke has been sent back to Belgium following a night which he probably doesn’t remember. After the completion of his cycling events in which he finished 15th in the omnium, while Belgium was ninth in the team sprint, Van Hoecke took to London for some serious fun.

Van Hoecke was removed from the Games by the Belgian Olympic Committee after images of him appearing drunk were published by The Daily Mail.

The photos show the 20-year-old being carried into a taxi outside a London nightclub. Van Hoeck has his eyes closed and his clothes are soaked.

The Belgian Olympic Committee called the incident “deplorable.”

Van Hoecke expressed regret for the actions and where he chose to celebrate his experience at the Olympics.

“What happened is a pity. I am sorry, this should not have happened,” Van Hoecke told RTBF television. “But I also think that after two years of relentless work, I have the right to let my hair down. It would have been better if it had not happened here in London.

“I chose the wrong moment. Having said that, it was outside the Olympic Village, I wasn’t disturbing other athletes, they didn’t say anything about it.”

While I’m sure the Belgian Olympic mission would love positive press above all else, I have trouble defending their choice to send an athlete home two days before the closing ceremony because he got busted in an inebriated state by a tabloid.

According to reports he didn’t do anything to harm anyone (but himself) and, as he himself points out, the Olympics have been the culmination of four years of incredibly hard work. He should have the right to have a good time. If he happens to look like an idiot in the process, so be it. Plenty of other athletes have been busted partying hard without repercussions, why should he be an example?

You can find the pictures in question here. They are equal parts hilarious and damning. Know your limit, stay within it.

With talk of suspensions and discipline coming against Canada’s women’s soccer team after their public flogging of Norwegian official Christiana Pedersen, it would make sense to see if the team had any regrets after they captured a bronze medal for their efforts against France. After all, apologizing is the Canadian way. I mean, how often have you (provided you are Canadian) apologized to someone who walked into you for example? For many Canadians this is a daily occurrence.

Naturally it follows that it would make sense for Canadians to publicly apologize for tearing a strip off of a FIFA official. So, when asked if she felt that they had gone too far in their criticism of the ref, Christine Sinclair said sorry, right?

“No,” Sinclair said on Friday.

WHAAAAAAA?

So, you stand by your comments?

“Yes,” she said.

No need to clarify them?

“It’s an emotional game,” she said. “We’d just lost a chance at a gold medal. For some of us, that’s a childhood dream, gone. And yeah, we felt it was a little unfair at times.”

Even though you could have been suspended? SUSPENDED?!

“That’s what I hear,” Sinclair said on Friday. “With some of the things that we said to the media, if they were going to suspend myself or Melissa Tancredi, then they would have had to suspend our whole team. We were frustrated and mad, and I think we refused to just be okay with it — we wanted to say things, because that’s how we felt.”

Hmmm, I see. Well then.

I must say from a totally biased Canadian perspective, this is objectively awesome. If I remove myself from the equation, it is also objectively awesome.

Canadian perspective:

I can’t begin to count the number of times I’ve witnessed a Canadian football team — men’s or women’s — get royally screwed. And I don’t even mean in a semi-secretive way. I mean in a flagrant ‘this ref is out to get us’ way. CONCACAF qualifiers, especially the ones featuring Canada says I, have featured some of the most atrocious reffing in the history of things that need refs. As in, ‘show this to everyone who wants to be an official so they know what not to do’ bad.

It’s infuriating, as anyone who cares will tell you. And to see our women get so close — against a number one USA team no less — and fall victim to an atrocious official was more of the same. Numbing.

But the fallout this time was different. To hear Christine Sinclair and Melissa Tancredi come out and rip the official for it was something incredibly vindicating after years and years of being crapped on. To know we would go on and play for a medal and make it clear that we’re mad as hell, that was spectacular. No more nice Canadian silliness. We got screwed and you’ll be damned if you don’t hear about it. Fantastic.

That should have been our moment in the Gold Medal game and we will not apologize for being victimized. We’re not sorry and we’re not going to waste your time thinking that we are.

Objective perspective:

Yeah, maybe the comments they made were a bit excessive. I mean, sure, I doubt the Norwegian ref actually owns and wears a USA Soccer jersey. Norwegians are huge footy fans, but that seems to be an excessive collector’s purchase, even by the most ludicrous Pokemon ‘Gotta catch ‘em all’ standards. Why on earth would she have that?

Even if we accept that the comments were over the top, it’s refreshing to see athletes come out, be critical of someone who deserved to be criticized and not back down after the fact. Is there anything more patronizing in sport than when someone will criticize person X for doing Y and then hold a press conference to proclaim their sorrow over completely candid and forthright remarks? I say no and if you disagree you’re probably wrong on this one.

It’s not genuine and it insults our collective intelligence.

This, however, was entirely genuine. They were furious, they were honest about their fury and they’re not going to correct what they felt at that time because it’s the truth.

If we’re going to get anywhere as a society that plays and watches sports, why keep protecting officials? The all-powerful mystique only yields problems. If players are to be held accountable, officials need to be held accountable because both are equally prone to screwing up. Officiating is a difficult and largely thankless job, but you’re not infallible and pointing that out when it’s true shouldn’t be an offense.

Canada called it like it is and they’re not backing down which is something we can all appreciate on a fundamental level whether you take their side in this instance or not.

Next time the coach of your team in any sport drops a ‘no comment’ on the reffing when it decides a crucial game, tell me you wouldn’t love some of that Sinclair-Tancredi candor, because that’s exactly what you want.

In sum:

Christine Sinclair has nothing to apologize for because she did the right thing. She spoke her mind, just like Tancredi did, and they were right about what they felt, and they were right about what happened. To say they regret what they said would mean they regret what they felt and you can’t regret feeling ripped off in an excruciatingly close loss. It happens.

Never apologize for speaking your mind, Christine, because your mind is right on this one.

Canadian perspective:

Also Christine, I think I love you.

Nothing like a good generational feud to get a day started as it appears as though Carl Lewis and Usain Bolt have lost whatever tolerance they had for one another. Lewis came up with some controversial remarks directed at the Jamaican sprinting program and this has not been met kindly by the fastest human being ever named after a weather phenomenon.

What did Lewis say, you ask? Way ahead of you.

“Countries like Jamaica do not have a random program, so they can go months without being tested. I’m not saying anyone is on anything, but everyone needs to be on a level playing field.”

The implication there is pretty clear despite Lewis’ cover. Lewis who, in the interest of context, has been hyping up the US like nobody’s business, is suggesting that Jamaica’s program slants the competitive balance in their favour and the Usain Bolts and Yohan Blakes of the world are allowed to dope like crazy, shatter records and get the drugs out of their system for the Olympics.

Enter Bolt.

“I’m going to say something controversial right now. Carl Lewis, I have no respect for him,” Bolt said. “The things he says about the track athletes is really downgrading for another athlete to say something like that. I think he’s just looking for attention, really, because nobody really talks much about him.

“That was really sad for me when I heard the other day what he was saying. It was upsetting. I’ve lost all respect for him. All respect.”

Asked which specific comments from Lewis made him angry, Bolt replied: “It was all about drugs. Talking about drugs. For me, an athlete out of the sport to be saying that. That was really upsetting for me. Really upsetting.

“To jump up and say something like that. As far as I’m concerned he’s looking for attention. That’s all.”

To quote Denzel Washington in Training Day, “Boom.”

Now there are many ways to look at this. One way to look at this is Lewis could very well be pointing out an unfair advantage to Jamaica. The other way is that he’s a bitter old codger who’s trying to create a fuss for the benefit of his own country because he can’t stand someone looming large over his legacy.

I’m leaning towards the latter.

The irony dripping from Carl Lewis accusing a program of manipulating doping rules, of course, is that he tested positive three times before the 1988 games where Lewis captured three gold medals, the most notable of which was the 100m sprint after Canadian Ben Johnson — you may know the name — tested positive in Seoul, easily the most PED ridden games in history. Why was Lewis allowed to compete, let alone allowed to keep his medal? The US Olympic Committee overturned his positive tests. Three times.

Pot, meet kettle.

The fact of the matter is that Usain Bolt has never tested positive for anything in his career, and we can’t assume that he will. Presuming PED use because of strong performances is a dangerous path as any avid baseball fan will tell you.

In the interest of fairness, it should be noted that Yohan Blake was suspended for three months in 2009 for stimulant use despite the fact that the stimulant was not on the World Anti-Doping Agency’s banned list. The suspensions came domestically because of the stimulant’s similarity in structure to one that is banned.

Again, this is Jamaica reprimanding its own people because of a tie they recognized, not an outside committee enforcing steadfast rules on a substance.

The sniping from Carl Lewis underscores the ridiculousness of our skepticism towards success. We ought to be skeptical of the Jamaican sprint program because of allegations that they don’t enforce doping regulations on their own people. Nonsense. Jamaica has no clear record of manipulating drug testing or allowing people to skip out or allowing those who have tested positive to compete. The United States on the other hand…

As if the sketchy legacy of Lewis wasn’t enough, perhaps we ought to invoke the Marion Jones saga, or Justin Gatlin who made his return to the Olympics this year after an eight year ban in 2007 which was reduced to four years. Now we’re learning of ties between sprinter Carmelita Jeter and hurdler Jason Richardson to Mark Block, a man linked to BALCO serving a ten year ban from track and field. Perhaps we ought to turn our attention to Michael Phelps, Ryan Lochte or Missy Franklin? If the sprinting program can hide doping surely the swimming program can too.

The arc in narrative is the problem with this type of speculation. By picking out which exceptional performers we want to accuse of doping, we enter a vicious cycle of picking an choosing who we want to question. Bolt and Blake are being questioned by Lewis, but why not Jeter and Richardson? It’s an endless game of he said, she said.

Sure, you can question Bolt after he takes a shot at Carl Lewis who is, like it or not, an Olympic legend. The question after that should be how you view the guy with a history of cheating who accuses others of cheating. You could do worse than telling Carl Lewis to keep his mouth shout. Carry on, Usain.

Until they give us a reason to be skeptical, there’s no reason to think Jamaica is dirty. Just sit back and enjoy the run.

Another day, another bronze for Canada as Richard Weinberger has captured a medal in the 10,000m marathon swim with a time of 1:50:00.3.

Weinberger came into this Olympics games as an under the radar medal favourite. I say under the radar because the consensus seems to be that not many casual Olympic fans were aware of his presence in the race. I say medal favourite because he’s actually established quite a résumé in the event.

He entered the marathon race as the reigning gold medalist from both the 2011 Pan American Games and the 2011 London Test Event. Yet, not a ton of hype, which seems odd. At any rate, Weinberger came through against a packed field and leaves London with a bronze medal.

A solid accomplishment despite the testing when you consider that Canada’s representation in this event has been sparse historically. Canada didn’t send a single marathon swimmer to Beijing 2008, when it debuted at the Olympics.

Now, with bronze medal in tow, Weinberger can presumably return to his education at the University of Victoria, which he put on hold to train for the games. If the ‘I’m an Olympic medalist’ pick up line doesn’t work for him at student bars, I don’t know what will.

To the folks who will complain that they’re tired of bronze medals: It’s called ‘Own the Podium’ — nobody specified which step.