Did you know Canada means ‘Bronze’ in Elvish? Probably not, because I just made that up but the sentiment is there. Given that fake definition, Mark de Jonge certainly refused to be anti-Canadian on Saturday morning as he paddled his way to a bronze medal in the K1 200m Canoe Sprint which required photo review to confirm the final standings.

Upon that further review, de Jonge’s time of 36.657 seconds was good enough to net him a medal after a fascinating training period leading up to the games.

De Jonge dropped out of the Canadian program after he didn’t qualify for the Beijing games as a member of the K4 500m team and left to pursue his career in civil engineering. When the Olympics changed the sprint event from the 500m to the 200m de Jonge, a sprint specialist, took a leave of absence from his job to give the games one last kick at the can.

Here we are with medal in tow.

For those of you who like to count things, the bronze from de Jonge gives Canada 18 medals at the London games, putting them even with the medal count at Beijing 2008. The kicker there, of course, is that Canada had three gold medals in Beijing which isn’t a ton, but still three times as many as they do in London.

Conventional logic, which was conveniently invoked at the Vancouver games in 2010 when Canada had a bucketload of golds, is that the country with the most golds has won the medal count. This may make some graphs you see in coming days inaccurate, but we’re flexible with self-evaluation.

If bronze ever becomes the most valuable metal on earth, Canadians will be lighting cigars with money for a long time after London 2012.

Here’s your rundown of the Olympics events you need to watch today. (All times Eastern)

Athletics

Rachel Seaman will look to bring Canada a medal in the 20km Race Walk competition at noon. Cameron Levins goes in the men’s 5000m competition at 2:30pm. Canada will also look for team glory in the 4x100m relay after posting the third fastest qualifying time.

Basketball

The women’s medals will be handed out on Saturday as Russia and Australia duke it out for Bronze at noon while the US and France will fight over the Gold at 4:00 pm.

Boxing

The golds will be handed out in the Light Fly, Bantam, Light Welter, Middle, Heavy divisions throughout the afternoon.

Canoe Sprint

Canada will be looking for more Canoe Sprint medals as Mark de Jonge will go in the K1 200m at 4:30 am, while the team of Ryan Cochrane and Hugues Fournel will race in the K2 200m at 5:41 am.

Cycling – Mountain Bike

Catherine Pendrel and Emily Batty will be racing for Canada in the women’s cross-country event at 7:30 am.

Diving

The 10m platform final takes place at 3:30 pm.

Football

The men’s football gold medal match takes place between Brazil and Mexico at 10 am.

Handball

The women’s Gold medal match takes place between Norway and Montenegro at 3:30 pm.

Taekwondo

Francois Coulombe-Fortier will fight for Canada in the +80kg competition preliminary round at 7:45 am.

Volleyball

Women’s volleyball medals get handed out on Saturday. Japan takes on Korea at 6:30 am for the Bronze while Brazil and the USA play for Gold at 1:30 pm.

Wrestling

Arjan Bhullar will wrestle at 8:45 am against Komeil Ghasemi of Iran in the 120kg freestyle 1/8 finals.

 

For a full list of the events going on today, click here for the London 2012 Official Olympic Schedule

The Olympic party times will roll on for a few more athletes who have their events done at the games and you can expect phenomenal shenanigans to ensue. We already looked at the antics of Australian rower Joshua Booth who was sent home early from the games for an alcohol fueled rampage and here we are again.

Well, Booth may have been outdone.

Belgian cyclist Gijs Van Hoecke has been sent back to Belgium following a night which he probably doesn’t remember. After the completion of his cycling events in which he finished 15th in the omnium, while Belgium was ninth in the team sprint, Van Hoecke took to London for some serious fun.

Van Hoecke was removed from the Games by the Belgian Olympic Committee after images of him appearing drunk were published by The Daily Mail.

The photos show the 20-year-old being carried into a taxi outside a London nightclub. Van Hoeck has his eyes closed and his clothes are soaked.

The Belgian Olympic Committee called the incident “deplorable.”

Van Hoecke expressed regret for the actions and where he chose to celebrate his experience at the Olympics.

“What happened is a pity. I am sorry, this should not have happened,” Van Hoecke told RTBF television. “But I also think that after two years of relentless work, I have the right to let my hair down. It would have been better if it had not happened here in London.

“I chose the wrong moment. Having said that, it was outside the Olympic Village, I wasn’t disturbing other athletes, they didn’t say anything about it.”

While I’m sure the Belgian Olympic mission would love positive press above all else, I have trouble defending their choice to send an athlete home two days before the closing ceremony because he got busted in an inebriated state by a tabloid.

According to reports he didn’t do anything to harm anyone (but himself) and, as he himself points out, the Olympics have been the culmination of four years of incredibly hard work. He should have the right to have a good time. If he happens to look like an idiot in the process, so be it. Plenty of other athletes have been busted partying hard without repercussions, why should he be an example?

You can find the pictures in question here. They are equal parts hilarious and damning. Know your limit, stay within it.

With talk of suspensions and discipline coming against Canada’s women’s soccer team after their public flogging of Norwegian official Christiana Pedersen, it would make sense to see if the team had any regrets after they captured a bronze medal for their efforts against France. After all, apologizing is the Canadian way. I mean, how often have you (provided you are Canadian) apologized to someone who walked into you for example? For many Canadians this is a daily occurrence.

Naturally it follows that it would make sense for Canadians to publicly apologize for tearing a strip off of a FIFA official. So, when asked if she felt that they had gone too far in their criticism of the ref, Christine Sinclair said sorry, right?

“No,” Sinclair said on Friday.

WHAAAAAAA?

So, you stand by your comments?

“Yes,” she said.

No need to clarify them?

“It’s an emotional game,” she said. “We’d just lost a chance at a gold medal. For some of us, that’s a childhood dream, gone. And yeah, we felt it was a little unfair at times.”

Even though you could have been suspended? SUSPENDED?!

“That’s what I hear,” Sinclair said on Friday. “With some of the things that we said to the media, if they were going to suspend myself or Melissa Tancredi, then they would have had to suspend our whole team. We were frustrated and mad, and I think we refused to just be okay with it — we wanted to say things, because that’s how we felt.”

Hmmm, I see. Well then.

I must say from a totally biased Canadian perspective, this is objectively awesome. If I remove myself from the equation, it is also objectively awesome.

Canadian perspective:

I can’t begin to count the number of times I’ve witnessed a Canadian football team — men’s or women’s — get royally screwed. And I don’t even mean in a semi-secretive way. I mean in a flagrant ‘this ref is out to get us’ way. CONCACAF qualifiers, especially the ones featuring Canada says I, have featured some of the most atrocious reffing in the history of things that need refs. As in, ‘show this to everyone who wants to be an official so they know what not to do’ bad.

It’s infuriating, as anyone who cares will tell you. And to see our women get so close — against a number one USA team no less — and fall victim to an atrocious official was more of the same. Numbing.

But the fallout this time was different. To hear Christine Sinclair and Melissa Tancredi come out and rip the official for it was something incredibly vindicating after years and years of being crapped on. To know we would go on and play for a medal and make it clear that we’re mad as hell, that was spectacular. No more nice Canadian silliness. We got screwed and you’ll be damned if you don’t hear about it. Fantastic.

That should have been our moment in the Gold Medal game and we will not apologize for being victimized. We’re not sorry and we’re not going to waste your time thinking that we are.

Objective perspective:

Yeah, maybe the comments they made were a bit excessive. I mean, sure, I doubt the Norwegian ref actually owns and wears a USA Soccer jersey. Norwegians are huge footy fans, but that seems to be an excessive collector’s purchase, even by the most ludicrous Pokemon ‘Gotta catch ‘em all’ standards. Why on earth would she have that?

Even if we accept that the comments were over the top, it’s refreshing to see athletes come out, be critical of someone who deserved to be criticized and not back down after the fact. Is there anything more patronizing in sport than when someone will criticize person X for doing Y and then hold a press conference to proclaim their sorrow over completely candid and forthright remarks? I say no and if you disagree you’re probably wrong on this one.

It’s not genuine and it insults our collective intelligence.

This, however, was entirely genuine. They were furious, they were honest about their fury and they’re not going to correct what they felt at that time because it’s the truth.

If we’re going to get anywhere as a society that plays and watches sports, why keep protecting officials? The all-powerful mystique only yields problems. If players are to be held accountable, officials need to be held accountable because both are equally prone to screwing up. Officiating is a difficult and largely thankless job, but you’re not infallible and pointing that out when it’s true shouldn’t be an offense.

Canada called it like it is and they’re not backing down which is something we can all appreciate on a fundamental level whether you take their side in this instance or not.

Next time the coach of your team in any sport drops a ‘no comment’ on the reffing when it decides a crucial game, tell me you wouldn’t love some of that Sinclair-Tancredi candor, because that’s exactly what you want.

In sum:

Christine Sinclair has nothing to apologize for because she did the right thing. She spoke her mind, just like Tancredi did, and they were right about what they felt, and they were right about what happened. To say they regret what they said would mean they regret what they felt and you can’t regret feeling ripped off in an excruciatingly close loss. It happens.

Never apologize for speaking your mind, Christine, because your mind is right on this one.

Canadian perspective:

Also Christine, I think I love you.

Nothing like a good generational feud to get a day started as it appears as though Carl Lewis and Usain Bolt have lost whatever tolerance they had for one another. Lewis came up with some controversial remarks directed at the Jamaican sprinting program and this has not been met kindly by the fastest human being ever named after a weather phenomenon.

What did Lewis say, you ask? Way ahead of you.

“Countries like Jamaica do not have a random program, so they can go months without being tested. I’m not saying anyone is on anything, but everyone needs to be on a level playing field.”

The implication there is pretty clear despite Lewis’ cover. Lewis who, in the interest of context, has been hyping up the US like nobody’s business, is suggesting that Jamaica’s program slants the competitive balance in their favour and the Usain Bolts and Yohan Blakes of the world are allowed to dope like crazy, shatter records and get the drugs out of their system for the Olympics.

Enter Bolt.

“I’m going to say something controversial right now. Carl Lewis, I have no respect for him,” Bolt said. “The things he says about the track athletes is really downgrading for another athlete to say something like that. I think he’s just looking for attention, really, because nobody really talks much about him.

“That was really sad for me when I heard the other day what he was saying. It was upsetting. I’ve lost all respect for him. All respect.”

Asked which specific comments from Lewis made him angry, Bolt replied: “It was all about drugs. Talking about drugs. For me, an athlete out of the sport to be saying that. That was really upsetting for me. Really upsetting.

“To jump up and say something like that. As far as I’m concerned he’s looking for attention. That’s all.”

To quote Denzel Washington in Training Day, “Boom.”

Now there are many ways to look at this. One way to look at this is Lewis could very well be pointing out an unfair advantage to Jamaica. The other way is that he’s a bitter old codger who’s trying to create a fuss for the benefit of his own country because he can’t stand someone looming large over his legacy.

I’m leaning towards the latter.

The irony dripping from Carl Lewis accusing a program of manipulating doping rules, of course, is that he tested positive three times before the 1988 games where Lewis captured three gold medals, the most notable of which was the 100m sprint after Canadian Ben Johnson — you may know the name — tested positive in Seoul, easily the most PED ridden games in history. Why was Lewis allowed to compete, let alone allowed to keep his medal? The US Olympic Committee overturned his positive tests. Three times.

Pot, meet kettle.

The fact of the matter is that Usain Bolt has never tested positive for anything in his career, and we can’t assume that he will. Presuming PED use because of strong performances is a dangerous path as any avid baseball fan will tell you.

In the interest of fairness, it should be noted that Yohan Blake was suspended for three months in 2009 for stimulant use despite the fact that the stimulant was not on the World Anti-Doping Agency’s banned list. The suspensions came domestically because of the stimulant’s similarity in structure to one that is banned.

Again, this is Jamaica reprimanding its own people because of a tie they recognized, not an outside committee enforcing steadfast rules on a substance.

The sniping from Carl Lewis underscores the ridiculousness of our skepticism towards success. We ought to be skeptical of the Jamaican sprint program because of allegations that they don’t enforce doping regulations on their own people. Nonsense. Jamaica has no clear record of manipulating drug testing or allowing people to skip out or allowing those who have tested positive to compete. The United States on the other hand…

As if the sketchy legacy of Lewis wasn’t enough, perhaps we ought to invoke the Marion Jones saga, or Justin Gatlin who made his return to the Olympics this year after an eight year ban in 2007 which was reduced to four years. Now we’re learning of ties between sprinter Carmelita Jeter and hurdler Jason Richardson to Mark Block, a man linked to BALCO serving a ten year ban from track and field. Perhaps we ought to turn our attention to Michael Phelps, Ryan Lochte or Missy Franklin? If the sprinting program can hide doping surely the swimming program can too.

The arc in narrative is the problem with this type of speculation. By picking out which exceptional performers we want to accuse of doping, we enter a vicious cycle of picking an choosing who we want to question. Bolt and Blake are being questioned by Lewis, but why not Jeter and Richardson? It’s an endless game of he said, she said.

Sure, you can question Bolt after he takes a shot at Carl Lewis who is, like it or not, an Olympic legend. The question after that should be how you view the guy with a history of cheating who accuses others of cheating. You could do worse than telling Carl Lewis to keep his mouth shout. Carry on, Usain.

Until they give us a reason to be skeptical, there’s no reason to think Jamaica is dirty. Just sit back and enjoy the run.

Another day, another bronze for Canada as Richard Weinberger has captured a medal in the 10,000m marathon swim with a time of 1:50:00.3.

Weinberger came into this Olympics games as an under the radar medal favourite. I say under the radar because the consensus seems to be that not many casual Olympic fans were aware of his presence in the race. I say medal favourite because he’s actually established quite a résumé in the event.

He entered the marathon race as the reigning gold medalist from both the 2011 Pan American Games and the 2011 London Test Event. Yet, not a ton of hype, which seems odd. At any rate, Weinberger came through against a packed field and leaves London with a bronze medal.

A solid accomplishment despite the testing when you consider that Canada’s representation in this event has been sparse historically. Canada didn’t send a single marathon swimmer to Beijing 2008, when it debuted at the Olympics.

Now, with bronze medal in tow, Weinberger can presumably return to his education at the University of Victoria, which he put on hold to train for the games. If the ‘I’m an Olympic medalist’ pick up line doesn’t work for him at student bars, I don’t know what will.

To the folks who will complain that they’re tired of bronze medals: It’s called ‘Own the Podium’ — nobody specified which step.

Here’s your rundown of the Olympics events you need to watch today. (All times Eastern)

Athletics

No Canadians to speak of today but quite a few medals up for grabs. The Men’s Pole Vault final goes at 2:00 pm and the 4×400 relay gets going at 4:20 pm. On the Women’s side, the hammer throw starts at 2:35 pm, the 5000m final will exhaust us all at 3:05 pm, the 4 x 100m relay final takes off at 3:40 pm and the 1500m runs in a circle 3:55 pm.

Basketball

The game that everybody has been waiting to see is happening in the semifinals and not the finals as the United States takes on Argentina at 12:00 pm. The other semifinal match between Spain and Russia tips off at 4:00 pm.

BMX

The awesomeness of BMX racing continues today except this time it’s for medals. The Women’s semifinals start their peddling at at 10:00 am with the final beginning at 11:30 am while the Men do the same at 10:08 am and 11:40 am, respectively. Can’t say it’s not over quickly.

Football

The bronze medal match in the Men’s tournament between Korea and Japan kicks off (literally. Hah!) at 2:45 pm.

Field Hockey

For something a little different, the Women’s bronze medal match between New Zealand and Great Britain (Team GB!) begins at 10:30 am while the gold medal match between Argentina and The Netherlands goes at 3:00 pm.

Sailing

If you like a more relaxing sport to watch, we have some sailing finals today. The Men’s 470 medal race sets sail at 7:00 am, while the Women’s 470 goes at 8:00 am.

Swimming

If you really want to feel tired, you can tune into the Men’s 10km marathon swim at 7:00 am featuring Canada’s very own Richard Weinberger. Who is probably an insane person, as is everyone who swims 10km at one time.

Synchronized Swimming

The Canadian Women’s Synchronized Swimming hit the pool for the Free Routine Final at 10:00 am.

Taekwondo

In the Women’s 67kg tournament, Canadian Karine Sergerie fights at at 7:30 am. The medal matches begin at 3:00 pm while the gold medal match is set for 5:15 pm. On the Men’s side, in the 80kg tournament, Canadian Sebastien Michaud will fight at 6:45 am with medal matches going at 3:15 pm and 5:30 pm, respectively.

Wrestling

We also have some good ol’ fashioned wrestling today, with a few Canadians even. David Tremblay takes part in the Men’s 55kg freestyle 1/8 finals at 8:30 am with the bronze medal match taking place at 12:45 pm and the gold medal match scheduled for 2:03 pm. In the Men’s 74kg freestyle, Matthew Judah Gentry takes part in his 1/8 final at 8:40 am while the medal matches go at 12:54 pm and 2:50 pm, respectively.

For a full list of the events going on today, click here for the London 2012 Official Olympic Schedule

 

Here’s your rundown of the Olympics events you need to watch today. (All times Eastern)

The American Women’s Soccer team, after all that, have won gold at the 2012 Olympic games. There was just so much schadenfreude running through this game, it was kind of unbelievable. I do not think it is a stretch to say that most Canadians were not rooting for the Americans. After the events of the semifinal match, it would have been lots of fun to see the team from Japan upset the Americans, if only to see the Twitter reactions. Personally, I do not consider myself a particularly strong nationalist so, at the Olympics, I find that I generally just root to see amazing athletes do amazing things, regardless of country. Of course I prefer Canadians to win medals over others but I rarely find myself actively rooting against Olympic athletes. That being said, I was absolutely rooting for the Japanese in this game. Unfortunately, at least from my perspective, the Americans defeated the Japanese 2-1 in the final game.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Jamaican trio of Usain Bolt, Yohan Blake and Warren Weir are really, really fast. Now that I have the obvious out of the way, let’s get to the news. The trio swept the podium in the Men’s 200m dash with the predicted order – Bolt, Blake, Weir. Blake actually looked to have the race in hand for a second before Bolt was like “oh yeah, I’m the fastest man ever” and turned on the jets before turning them off just before the finish in very Bolt-like fashion.

Bolt tied Michael Johnson for the 3rd fastest 200m run ever with a time of 19.32 seconds and became the first man ever to repeat as the 200m gold medalist at the Olympics. Oh yeah, he also holds the world record in the event as well. For the record, Yohan Blake ran the second fastest ever in 2011, forever the second fiddle despite also being stupidly fast.

Warren Weir is the newest Jamaican sprinter to keep an eye on as the 22-year-old fought off the rest of the pack for the third place finish, though he was well behind both Bolt and Blake running a personal best 19.84. We are truly witnessing an athlete of never before seen proportions in Bolt.

A little tip to the producers of the next X-Men movie – cast Usain Bolt as Quicksilver. You’ll save a fortune on special effects.

Add another silver onto the pile for Canada.

Tonya Lynn Verbeek took home a silver for her efforts in the Women’s 55kg Freestyle Wrestling competition after being defeated by Japan’s Saori Yoshida in the gold medal final.

Verbeek put up a good fight but got taken down heavily and pushed out of bound by Yoshida in the first round, giving her an insurmountable 3-0 lead for the round. In the second, Verbeek was again taken down out of bounds by Yoshida, but her team threw the Challenge Brick (actually a thing) saying that it was, in fact, Yoshida who had first gone down out of bounds. The ruling on the mat was upheld, however, which cost Verbeek yet another point for losing a challenge. The 2-0 deficit was too much for Verbeek, who just couldn’t seem to get any sort of takedown game going, and she was defeated 2-0 (3-2, 2-0).

It was a bittersweet finish for the 34-year-old and is yet another non-gold for Canada at these Games. But, a medal is a medal and Yoshida is considered one of the most dominant wrestlers in the world, so perhaps this was a foregone conclusion.

However, I think we can all agree that the real story here is the discovery of the Challenge Brick, dropped at the side of the mat to signify a challenge from a wrestler’s team. I think the NFL should adopt the Challenge Brick, I’d love to see Rex Ryan have to chuck a brick onto the field every time he wants to complain about something.