San Francisco Giants v Atlanta Braves

So much for Drew Stubbs! According to Jon Heyman, public face of Boras Corp, Scott Boras client Michael Bourn agrees to terms with the Cleveland Indians on a four-year deal worth $48 million, with an option for a fifth year that would push the deal to $60 million total.

Scott Boras always gets his man even if it is for less than previous anticipated.

There is a lot to like about this deal for Cleveland. First and foremost, they receive the services of a very good player for the next four years (with an option for a fifth.) Michael Bourn is something of a throwback player in that he has no power of which to speak. Even though he has only 16 home runs over the last four seasons, only five Major League outfielders put up more fWAR than Bourn: Ben Zobrist, Ryan Braun, Matt Holliday, Andrew McCutchen, and Jose Bautista.

Cleveland did not sign Bourn for the last four years, they signed him for the next four years. What kind of player do they get? A speedy on-base machine who runs down plenty of balls in the outfield and runs the bases alertly and effectively.

Bourn enters his age 30 season with concerns over the rate at which speedy contact hitters age floating around him. His stolen base totals are sure to decline, but as discussed earlier today, stolen bases are an insignificant piece of the total package.

Of note for Cleveland fans: since the strike, only six outfielders managed to post an ISO under .110 and a BABIP over .320 between their age-30 and age-35 seasons. Bourn’s career BABIP is .343 and his career ISO is just .093 (.349/.117 in 2012.) Only two of those players, Ichiro! and Stan Javier, managed to most more than 5 fWAR over that time. Five Wins total, that is.

As with most longish term free agent contract, the back half of the deal is much scarier than the front. In spite of the scary precedents noted above, getting Bourn at this seemingly reduced rate is a good deal for Cleveland. Bourn originally sought a B.J. Upton-type deal, instead he “settled” for a contract worth $12 million less than the total value of Upton’s contract with Atlanta.

To Cleveland’s credit, they get an additional discount as their top ten first round pick is protected AND they already signed a qualified free agent in Nick Swisher, meaning the pick Cleveland loses is only 71st overall. Compared to the Mets situation, where they stood to lose the eleventh overall pick in the draft, this must be considered a bonus for Cleveland.

Does this make the Tribe better in 2013? Of course. Drew Stubbs is a lot of things, better than Michael Bourn is not one of them. If Stubbs falls back to fourth outfielder or becomes trade fodder once again, Cleveland at least enters the season 2-3 wins better than they looked this morning.

Are they as good as the Tigers? Probably closer than we think. Are they better than the Royals? Probably. Pitching remains a question mark for the Tribe but they make another adept move to improve the club without sacrificing the financial flexibility they need as a mid-market club. Hanging on to their high draft picks is just the icing on the surprising cake that has been the free agent spending this winter.

Comments (15)

  1. Might make more sense to go with Stubbs in the outfield, Swisher at 1B and Reynolds at DH, no?

  2. I just knew this would happen…
    “The Bourn Cleveland Conspiracy”:)

  3. sleeper team for 2013 season!

    • Is it conceivable that Cleveland could flip Bourn to another team, potentially the Mets, in exchange for prospects that would exceed their loss of the 71st pick? Mets get their man and Cleveland acquires more/closer to MLB ready prospects for facilitating the transaction?

      • Can you explain how that would be better than simply keeping Michael Bourn, who is a very good baseball player?

      • Exactly what I was thinking – sign and trade. Cleveland stood to loose the least amount in terms of compensation in the league. Make sense that a team with an unprotected would approach them…. Rangers anyone ?

      • Just no. Also no. And… no.

      • If the Mets wanted Michael Bourn at that salary, they probably could have gotten Michael Bourn at that salary and kept the prospects. It’s not all that likely that Bourn would prefer Cleveland to the Mets.

        There’s no sign and trade here. It usually doesn’t make much sense unless it’s an extension being signed.

  4. I thought about this, but he signed such a team friendly deal it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to trade him as they likely won’t get back comparable value. The onyl way a deal happens here is if Cleveland is over budget with Bourne and they planned to flip him as soon as they signed him

  5. Cleveland was craving another K-lo style of player, except this guy doesn’t hit for a k-lo average, and he is older than when Kenny was in cleveland…… don’t get your hopes up

  6. Can we convince the Pirates to go all Marlins and give us Andrew McCutchen?

  7. This still doesn’t put them close to the Tigers in the Central. And to say it probably makes them better than the Royals is a huge stretch. Have you looked at the Indians rotation? It is pitiful. Bauer was a great pickup no doubt but the guy has hardly logged any innings in the big leagues and will have growing pains. Myers was dreadful a year ago and now is expected to start. Meanwhile Ubaldo hasn’t done a thing in a tribe uniform and Masterson is very erratic coming off a terrible year. They have a pretty good lineup, but let’s not make Mark Reynolds and Nick Swisher out to be saints. They now have great defense, very good bullpen arms, a good lineup and terrible pitching. Even with Bourn, this team is 4th best in AL Central, third if they perform well. No one is touching the Tigers and the Royals will be better. The White Sox and Indians will battle for third and to play plus 500 ball

    • They now have great defense, very good bullpen arms, a good lineup and terrible pitching

      As opposed to a team led by James Shields, a converted reliever, Bruce Chen, Ervin Santana and Hochevar?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *