Related Posts
Next Post
Draft Preview: 24. New Orleans Saints
No Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
100 Yards and Running
Editor
Contributors
Recent Updates
- And now Rob Gronkowski has a back problem too
- Doug Whaley on E.J. Manuel: “Time will tell” if he starts Week 1
- Fantasy value mining: Ryan Tannehill in 2013 = Andrew Luck in 2012?
- Mike Goodson had an interesting Thursday evening
- Michael Vick is bulking up
- On the Rob Gronkowski problem
- Randy Moss still doesn’t know if he’s playing next year
- There’s an open arrest warrant for Chad Johnson
- Donovan McNabb thinks he belongs in the Hall of Fame
- URGENT BREAKING NEWS: Weeden was the first QB in line during the Browns’ OTA drills
Archives
Blogroll
- 12th Man Rising
- Arrowhead Addict
- Baltimore Beat Down
- Battle Red Blog
- Bear Goggles On
- Behind the Steel Curtain
- Big Blue Interactive
- Big Cat Country
- Bleeding Green Nation
- Blogging the Boys
- Bolt Hype
- Bolts From The Blue
- Buffalo Rumblings
- Canal Street Chronicles
- Cappers Picks
- Cat Scratch Reader
- Cincy Jungle
- Colts Authority
- Daily Norseman
- Dawgpound Daily
- ESPN NFL Nation
- Field Gulls
- Hawkblogger
- Hogs Haven
- Inside The Bills
- Inside the Iggles
- Mile High Report
- Music City Miracles
- Musket Fire
- Niners Nation
- Pats Pulpit
- Pewter Plank
- Phin Phanatic
- Pride of Detroit
- Pro Football Hot Reads
- ProFootballTalk
- Raiders-Blog
- Reservation For Six
- Revenge Of The Birds
- Saints Nation
- Shutdown Corner
- Stampede Blue
- Steelers Lounge
- The Falcoholic
- The Jets Blog
- Total Packers
- Total Steelers
- Turf Show Times
- Waiting For Next Year
- Walter Football



Here's a new debate: Should college football players get paid?
Posted by Brad Gagnon under Commentary on Apr 01, 2011
The fact that former Auburn football players are now claiming they received cash payments while attending the school and playing for the Tigers is neither an urgent nor a horrifying news story, simply because it’s just the latest in a long line of reports linking collegiate athletes to dollar bills.
But it once again has fans and analysts asking if NCAA athletes should be paid. FoxSports.com columnist Jason Whitlock recently wrote a strong column scolding the NCAA for its flaws.
I moonlight as a CHL hockey host and have gotten to know a number of major-junior hockey players quite well. These guys are future professional athletes, but instead of getting a discount on post-secondary education they’re playing for money. Not a lot, but enough to make it so that the people producing the profits are benefiting from those profits. I’m having a hard time seeing a way in which making that money has negatively affected these guys.
I’d like to take a semi-outrageous route and liken the world of the NCAA to the world of illegal prostitution or marijuana. Regardless of what we do to run interference, people are going to smoke weed, people are to going to solicit hookers and college athletes are going to receive payments from boosters and/or schools.
In all three cases, legalizing the act makes it easier to regulate the inevitable. What’s so wrong with giving these kids something extra for their services? I realize that the spirit of amateur sports doesn’t call for such a thing, but that ship sailed when college football and basketball became billion-dollar industries.
Sadly, scenarios like these are unfolding all across the United States. Athletes are putting their health and safety on the line in exchange for nothing more than a shot at a fortune. But I guess that’s typical of a country where 400 people have more wealth than half of the population.