Last year at almost this exact same time, we conducted what we called the “inevitable” comparison between Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers three years into their respective careers as starters.

That was before Rodgers won his first Super Bowl and then posted historic stats in 2011. The jury’s still out on this season, but in light of Greg Jennings’ comments favoring Rodgers over Jennings earlier this week, we can’t wait. Let’s take a look at both players through four years as starting quarterbacks.

This time, it’s truly as obligatory as our sports babe.

Aaron Rodgers (2008-2011) vs. Brett Favre (1992-1995)

Rodgers: 62
Favre: 61

Win-loss record
Rodgers: 41-21
Favre: 37-24

Playoff record
Rodgers*: 4-1
Favre: 4-3

Super Bowl wins
Rodgers*: 1
Favre: 0

Completion percentage
Rodgers: 65.5%
Favre: 62.6%

Passing yards
Rodgers: 17,037
Favre: 14,825

Yards per attempt
Rodgers: 8.3
Favre: 6.9

Passing touchdowns
Rodgers: 131
Favre: 108

Rodgers: 37
Favre: 64

Passer rating
Rodgers: 105.0
Favre: 87.4

Rushing yards
Rodgers: 1,136
Favre: 797

Rushing touchdowns
Rodgers: 16
Favre: 7

* Still alive in the 2011 playoffs

Now, I don’t have to tell you that it wouldn’t be fair to compare the two pivots strictly based on the numbers I’ve just shown you.

Rodgers clearly has the edge, and he can only add to his legacy with another Super Bowl victory this year. But consider also that Rodgers spent the first three years of his career on the bench, learning from Favre. He didn’t make his first career start until he was 24. Favre was 22, and he didn’t become the Favre we grew to love until 1995 and 1996.

But you should also be looking at these numbers with consideration for the pass-happy trends that have gripped the NFL and made elite passers significantly more dominant in recent years. I explored this a bit in my look at Drew Brees’ single-season passing yards record last month.

Just for fun, I took the individual statistics from above, divided by four where necessary to determine a single-season average, and then found where those numbers would have placed each quarterback among the rest of the league’s pivots in the final seasons of the sample used for both Rodgers (2011) and Favre (1995). Here are the results:

Completion percentage
Rodgers: Ranked 5th
Favre: Ranked 7th

Passing yards
Rodgers: Ranked 7th
Favre: Ranked 9th

Yards per attempt
Rodgers: Ranked 6th
Favre: Ranked 16th

Passing touchdowns
Rodgers: Ranked 5th
Favre: Ranked 6th

Rodgers: Ranked 8th*
Favre: Ranked 25th*

Passer rating
Rodgers: Ranked 4th
Favre: Ranked 13th

* Among qualifying quarterbacks and with fewer picks resulting in a higher ranking.

So even when you take into consideration the shift in eras, Rodgers has been much more successful than Favre was at the four-year mark. Besides, those in Green Bay will tell you that the only stat that matters is Super Bowls. Rodgers has already matched Favre’s career number in rings, and has a chance to take the lead before Year 4 is done. Favre won his lone Lombardi Trophy in Year 5.