Related Posts
Previous post
Four teams that must pursue Mike Wallace
No Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
100 Yards and Running
Editor
Contributors
Recent Updates
- Aaron Rodgers is pretty excited about Randall Cobb, and you should be too
- Ray Lewis plans to climb Mount Kilimanjaro
- Wes Welker thinks he’ll catch fewer footballs this year
- What does the Steelers’ zone blocking mean for Le’Veon Bell?
- Ndamukong Suh was chillin’ with an octopus last night
- Behold, the O.J. Simpson mugshot tattoo
- Unnamed Jets think Mark Sanchez is a nice guy, but a crappy quarterback
- Get giddy: Percy Harvin says he’ll still be used as a running back
- Robert Griffin III was on a practice field today, and he did football things
- The Tape Never Lies: Dashon Goldson’s play will determine how much Tampa’s secondary improves
Archives
Blogroll
- 12th Man Rising
- Arrowhead Addict
- Baltimore Beat Down
- Battle Red Blog
- Bear Goggles On
- Behind the Steel Curtain
- Big Blue Interactive
- Big Cat Country
- Bleeding Green Nation
- Blogging the Boys
- Bolt Hype
- Bolts From The Blue
- Buffalo Rumblings
- Canal Street Chronicles
- Cappers Picks
- Cat Scratch Reader
- Cincy Jungle
- Colts Authority
- Daily Norseman
- Dawgpound Daily
- ESPN NFL Nation
- Field Gulls
- Hawkblogger
- Hogs Haven
- Inside The Bills
- Inside the Iggles
- Mile High Report
- Music City Miracles
- Musket Fire
- Niners Nation
- Pats Pulpit
- Pewter Plank
- Phin Phanatic
- Pride of Detroit
- Pro Football Hot Reads
- ProFootballTalk
- Raiders-Blog
- Reservation For Six
- Revenge Of The Birds
- Saints Nation
- Shutdown Corner
- Stampede Blue
- Steelers Lounge
- The Falcoholic
- The Jets Blog
- Total Packers
- Total Steelers
- Turf Show Times
- Waiting For Next Year
- Walter Football



Those defending the Saints are missing the point
Posted by Brad Gagnon under Commentary on Mar 06, 2012
Naturally and expectedly, there’s a group out there that is defending the Saints in the bounty scandal. Unsurprisingly, many of these defenders are Saints fans and/or residents of the 504. And while such tactics are really just an epitomizing example of classic homerism, they do raise legitimate points:
1. Football is inherently violent and players are indirectly compensated for removing opposing players from games by way of being paid to hit, and hit hard.
2. Teams undoubtedly see their chances of winning increase when an opposing player is injured and forced to either not play at all or play at less than 100 percent.
3. Bounties have existed below the surface for as long as football has been played, and surely exist in other NFL locker rooms.
As Bruce Nolan writes for the New Orleans Times-Picayune, local fans generally believe that “this is a case in which the Saints are just unluckier than other teams, not dirtier.”
The difference, of course, is that the Saints got caught. Fine.
But this isn’t 1989, when we all had a good, hearty laugh as Eagles coach Buddy Ryan placed bounties on members of the Cowboys. It’s 2012, and so much has changed. We’ve seen the devastating effects of concussions, and we now see a league that is proactively and aggressively trying to curb traumatic, life-altering injuries
The single biggest threat to the NFL’s reign atop the North American professional sports hierarchy? Injuries — particularly head injuries — and the image fashioned by the long-term effects of those injuries. As a result, there’s nothing commissioner Roger Goodell crusades against with more ferocity than that.
And thus — outside of game fixing — I can’t imagine a more serious crime than this one, at least in NFL circles.
The league has probably been clued into bounty programs for years, but the sloppy and ignorant Saints flaunted it enough to get caught, and now they’re the poster boys. Now, they’re being made an example of.
And as a result of forthcoming discipline, I’d imagine that the example will serve to stop or at least slow the degree to which illegal pay-for-performance programs are implemented across the NFL.