Eight years and four days after that Mickey Mouse Club guy introduced the world to Michael Jackson’s sister’s right breast, we have a new controversy stemming from a Super Bowl halftime show. This time, a rapper who goes by the name M.I.A. flipped the cameras the bird.

To be clear, I was not offended by either act. Like the majority of the 100-odd million people who saw both incidents, I have been personally flipped off before, and have — believe it or not — seen a female boob. Thus I am not haunted by the sight of either, and I’d imagine that the rest of you are in the same boat.

That said, doesn’t it strike people as odd that the Janet Jackson-Justin Timberlake Nipplegate episode seemed to garner significantly more outrage than M.I.A.’s middle finger?

In the first case, we were exposed to something synonymous with love, sex and even motherhood. Oh, and the majority of the nipple was concealed by a pasty. You can see more skin in that exact same time slot on prime-time television any night of the week. Correct me if I’m wrong, but very few men and women strongly dislike boobs.

In the second case, we were told to f— off. Who the hell wants that?

When comparing the two events on the surface, I think the M.I.A. act was more malicious, more disrespectful and more inappropriate.

But for whatever reason, Jackson’s right headlight inspired mass anger, a record fine from the FCC, lawsuits and a 4,600-word Wikipedia page. Everyone involved apologized, but it was still called a travesty. “It’s truly pitiful that my children can’t watch the Super Bowl now,” wrote Maureen, a Dallas mother and Helen Lovejoy impersonator.

M.I.A.’s finger hasn’t caused close to the same stir. Instead, we’re defending her. We seem to grasp that this was, at the very worst, a publicity stunt, and for the most part, we’re refusing to buy in.

So why the separate reactions?

Maybe it has to do with the Western world’s discomfort with sex and the body, compared to its obsession with violence and intensity as seen everywhere you look in American pop culture. Then again, that would entail some serious hypocrisy — why cry foul over a partially exposed breast while laughing and clapping as M&Ms lose their innocence and GoDaddy does its best Brazzers impression?

Maybe it’s just progress. Maybe we were desensitized a bit by Janet and now are less susceptible to becoming shocked and offended by incidents that, frankly, aren’t supposed to shock or offend us.

  • We’re all curious to see where Ricky Williams‘ intelligence takes him next, because he was a guy who played football much more than he was ever a football player. He’s simply a fascinating person, and he provided more evidence of that yesterday during an interview with Dave Hyde of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Williams was asked why he was retiring, and his response came in the form of a question when he said “why am I playing? That’s the question. If I could do anything in the world, and it’s do-able, why wouldn’t I do that?” Then when Hyde wondered what we’re all wondering and asked Williams about his plans, the Heisman winner said that a Nobel Prize “would be pretty cool.”
  • Jake Ballard‘s Super Bowl injury looked very serious because it is very serious. Ballard tore his ACL.
  • Remembering where you parked your car in a massive stadium parking lot leads to fewer awkward conversations with local authorities. Right, Giants fans?
  • The Internet insists on keeping this Gisele Bundchen story alive, which isn’t remotely surprising, and it likely won’t fade until the end of the week. But at least now we’re seeing a few columns supporting the supermodel, like the one written by Time’s Doug Glanville.
  • It’s officially Day 3 of the offseason now, a time when we begin to make the painful turn from Super Bowl dissection to silly season prognostication. For the Super Bowl loser, Wes Welker is the most pressing concern with his expiring contract, and BenJarvus Green-Ellis isn’t far behind.
  • Noted Boston homer Bill Simmons had no problem finding 15 silver linings in the Patriots’ season.
  • The odds of Santonio Holmes being in a Jets uniform next fall just increased significantly, because he’s now reportedly guaranteed $7.5 million next season.
  • And maybe that’s not a bad thing, because when he’s behaving well Holmes can still be a productive receiver. The problem, of course, is that those times of good behavior have been rare. Earlier this week Holmes attempted to start the process of mending his broken bridge with Mark Sanchez, tweeting his quarterback and saying that he’s pumped for the journey towards 2012.
  • The league is beginning to feel the wrath of Bill Polian, who said that prior to the 2010 draft Rob Gronkowski failed his physical with the Colts.
  • Joe Theismann thinks that the Redskins pursuing Peyton Manning if he becomes available isn’t a good idea or a bad idea. It’s a horrible idea.
  • Bolt Hype revisits the 2004 draft when the famous/infamous Eli Manning trade was orchestrated, and the Chargers landed Philip Rivers. Ben Roethlisberger was also on the board, and now out of those three quarterbacks, Manning and Roethlisberger have combined for four Super Bowl rings, while Rivers has none.
  • I’m not ashamed to admit that I’m incredibly excited for mock draft season. The draft is already being mocked relentlessly in some corners of the football blogosphere, and one mock has the Bengals trading up to take Trent Richardson.
  • Tony Romo will be Tiger Woods’ playing partner when the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am tees off tomorrow, and he’ll be heckled by Woods’ caddie, who’s a long-time Giants fan.
  • Michael Vick is still the most disliked athlete in sports, according to a poll conducted by Nielson and E-poll Market Research, which shows once again that his dog-fighting conviction will forever resonate with the general public.
  • And we finish off with another painful Peyton song from some fans in Tennessee who can’t let go of the past

This morning, the Giants paraded down the Canyon of Heroes to celebrate their fourth Super Bowl victory. But in the process, one fan reminded us that poor Eli Manning still doesn’t get any respect in NYC…

In her defense, she’s celebrating hard and has another human being on her shoulders, so maybe she just lost focus. Or maybe she thought she was at a parade honoring the San Francisco Giants, inexplicably in Manhattan and delayed by about 15 months, for their 2010 World Series title, and she simply wanted to see Jonathan Sanchez.

Okay, I’m reaching. But us blondes have to stick together in moments like these.

(Via Shutdown Corner)

Back in October, we relayed to you an interesting find from the guys at Smart Football, who stumbled upon a page from one of Buddy Ryan’s playbooks from Houston.

Essentially, the play — full diagram and explanation here — purposely called for more than 11 men on the field, essentially meaning that the defense was deliberately taking a too-many-men penalty, but taking valuable time off the clock…time that the offense can’t get back regardless of the penalty.

Ryan’s play was for goal-line situations, but it also makes sense if there are about 10 or 20 seconds left and an opponent with no timeouts remaining is in Hail Mary mode.

Sunday night, the Giants sent 12 men out with 17 seconds left. With that advantage, they successfully defended against the Hail Mary, losing only five yards due to the penalty while taking eight seconds off the clock.

Slate thinks that Justin Tuck is actually trying to get off the field prior to the snap, but it’s tough to tell and NBC didn’t provide a live replay with a wide shot. Regardless, it appears Coughlin used the strategy by accident. Had he been doing it on purpose, he would have used more than 12 men. Why not 13 or 14 or 45? Seriously, there’s nothing in the rules that gives the officials the right to blow the play dead in the instance that the Giants put the entire team on defense for a play like that.

Now we’ll see if the NFL closes an exposed loophole by introducing tweaks to that rule this offseason.

Ricky Williams has announced his retirement from professional football, but I’d imagine he’s only scratched the surface in terms of what he has the capability of accomplishing over the course of his lifetime.

Williams’ interests and strengths expand far beyond his football life. He treated his NFL career like a job, and he played to live, rather than living to play.

In his retirement press release, issued this afternoon by the Ravens, Williams wouldn’t even call his time as a pro football player a chapter in his life. Nope, it was just a single page.

“The NFL has been an amazing page in this chapter of my life,” Williams said. “I pray that all successive adventures offer me the same potential for growth, success and most importantly, fun. I want to thank all my fans, teammates, coaches and supporters for the strength they’ve given me to overcome so much.”

Other pages in this chapter: Ricky’s sudden 2004 retirement, only a year removed from winning the league’s rushing title. His random stint in Toronto, in the prime of his football career, as a member of the CFL’s Argonauts. And of course, his time spent studying holistic medicine in Grass Valley, Calif., also smack dab in the prime of his football life.

The first page would probably be his time in Texas, where Ricky ran for over 6,500 yards and won the Heisman Trophy as a junior.

The second page might document his experience at the 1999 draft, when Mike Ditka sold the entire farm to move up and take Williams with the fifth pick.

Williams outlasted Edgerrin James, who was selected one pick before him that year. He also outlasted Deuce McAllister, whom the Saints figured could replace Williams when they shocked the football world by trading him to Miami in 2002. McAllister had a few big years, but he wasn’t Ricky.

One more page would have to be dedicated to his penchant for smoking weed. The punishment for his reliance on marijuana was, after all, what spurred him to ditch the game eight years ago. It’s the only reason he was in Grass Valley, and the only reason he came to Canada.

Another page — or maybe more than a page — would probably cover Williams’ struggles with clinical depression and social anxiety disorder. He’s one of the oddest characters the NFL ever employed. Super shy, sneaky clever. Agree or disagree with his premises, the guy was brilliant. Interested in philosophy and fresh, outside-the-box thinking? Check out his Twitter feed.

I had the chance to talk to Williams when he was with the Argos in 2006. Despite being soft spoken, he’s very deliberate with his words, making each one count. He looks you in the eye and genuinely cares that all of those words reach the intended target with his design for them still intact. There’s no ego there.

The problem is that many of those who talk to Williams don’t get the message he’s sending. The problem is that he’s smarter than most of us. He knows that there’s a lot more in this world for him, which is why he’s walking away despite averaging a respectable 4.1 yards per carry with fresh-for-34 legs in 2011.

“As for what’s next,” Williams said. “I am excited about all the opportunities ahead – continuing my education, running The Ricky Williams Foundation and whatever other opportunities present themselves.”

I’m excited to find out what presents itself to Williams, and what road he takes. The only drawback is that some of those potential roads are unlikely to include Wi-Fi, reporters, cameras and microphones. There’s a good chance that, from the perspective of the mainstream media, Ricky Williams is about to disappear.

Jimmy Kimmel keeps killing it by asking Americans to do cruel things in order to make us laugh. It started at Halloween and continued at Christmas, and now he’s hit Super Bowl Sunday.

Yesterday was sort of depressing. To diehard football fans, the day after the Super Bowl is kind of like the day after Christmas. You go from the most important day in the football world to a cold, snowy wasteland with seemingly no end in sight.

What the hell are we supposed to do, watch basketball or hockey?

Fortunately, the NFL offseason is stocked with a series of merry football events, starting in two weeks with the NFL Combine, which brings the football world back to Indianapolis. Free agency begins on March 13. The draft? End of April. Minicamps and OTAs will at least provide fodder in May and June, and by the time August arrives we’ll be previewing the 2012 season.

But with all due respect to the NFL preseason and the CFL regular season, we won’t see real football again until Sept. 6, when the Super Bowl champion New York Giants host (fill in the blank) at MetLife Stadium in prime time.

And although that’s 212 days away, it’s never too early to start breaking it down. Based on the eight teams the Giants are slated to host this year, here are top potential matchups we’d like to see on that Thursday night, from favorite to least favorite to completely out of the question:

1. Packers at Giants: A battle of the last two Super Bowl champions, just like we had last year when the Packers hosted the Saints in the prime-time kickoff game. Plus, this is also a rematch of a 2011 playoff affair. A lot will unfold between now and September, but I’d have to imagine this would be the tightest spread — maybe even a pick’em.

2. Saints at Giants: This isn’t likely to happen, because I doubt the NFL would schedule New Orleans for three consecutive nationally-televised openers. But they’re the only other 2011 NFC playoff team on New York’s home schedule.

3. Steelers at Giants: Only twice in 10 years has the league scheduled a non-conference opponent in the opener, so this isn’t likely to happen either. That said, the Ben Roethlisberger-Eli Manning battle is superb. The two 2004 first-round picks have combined to win four rings and make five Super Bowls in only eight seasons.

4. Eagles at Giants: Michael Vick and the failed dream team will probably be almost entirely intact, and based on the way they finished 2011, they’ll be expected to give New York a run for their money in the NFC East.

5. Cowboys at Giants: If the Cowboys hadn’t choked in astonishing fashion back in Week 14 against New York, the Giants wouldn’t have even made the playoffs. A good, competitive division rivalry here.

Not happening: Redskins/Browns/Buccaneers at Giants.

The defending champion has never lost in this game, going 8-0 since the league adopted this format. But before that, they played the Thursday night opener for two years between two more random teams. And in the first-ever prime-time opener, back in 2002, the Giants actually lost at home to San Francisco.

After winning the Super Bowl in 2007, New York won this game in ’08, holding the Redskins to just seven points at Giants Stadium.

Tom Brady made this Tom Brady face because of the Giants defense.

While the quarterbacks get most of the publicity (and MVPs) in the Super Bowl, the defense continues to make big play after big play without getting enough credit. That changes now, as I delve into a halftime adjustment made by Giants defensive coordinator Perry Fewell that helped New York win the Super Bowl.

Fewell’s personnel packages were normal in the first half, consisting of the NASCAR package that features three defensive ends, and a Nickel package that was made up of three safeties unlike the typical three cornerbacks that teams put out on the field. Where it got interesting was in the coverage concepts that Fewell implemented, some of which featured straight man coverage, while at other times it was pure zone. Both of the philosophies came out of 1 and 2 high safety shells, with the former being used more while the Giants played Cover 3 — a 4 under, 3 deep zone coverage.

Cover 3 diagram courtesy of Smartfootball.com.

This was not much different than what was seen in the Week 9 matchup between these two teams. New England’s quick-footed pass catchers got the best of the Giants’ pass defenders, separating from them at the break point of their underneath routes multiple times and consequently moving the chains en route to 10 points in the second quarter.

However, the second half of the Super Bowl would be different as Fewell and the Giants defense made a coverage adjustment that would pay dividends late in the game. They still played their Cover 3 concept but with a slight alteration of responsibilities that would see the middle linebacker drop into the deep third area in the middle of the field, while a safety would replace him underneath in coverage. This showed that they were not concerned about the vertically challenged Patriots attacking deep, an area in which they failed all night, instead settling on short passes out of three- and five-step drops.

This coverage variation was seen on the final Patriots drive late in the fourth quarter. With the Giants leading 21-17, they turned to their coverage adjustment that they made while Madonna was performing the shuffle and some one-hit wonder was flipping the world the bird.

On this play, the Patriots came out in their 11 spread gun personnel package that has a single back in the backfield and a tight end flexed from the end of the formation, while the Giants looked to operate out of their 40 Big Nickel package — four-man line (40) and five (Nickel) defensive backs, three of which are safeties.

The Giants' coverage variation sees the middle linebacker drop while the safety comes underneath.

Tom Brady’s view of the coverage pre-snap was interesting, as he looked to the middle of the field to identify how many safeties there were, yet right across from him stood a linebacker fifteen yards off the line of scrimmage. To each side of the linebacker were the safeties — what were they going to do post-snap?

Looking at Tom Brady's view of the pre-snap defensive alignments.

When Brady snapped the ball, the MIKE (middle) linebacker dropped deep along with the two outside cornerbacks, splitting the field into thirds evenly. Underneath, the three safeties along with linebacker Michael Boley divided the field into fourths, with safety (left) Antrel Rolle and Boley being the Curl-to-Flat defenders, while safeties Kenny Phililps and Deon Grant became the Hook (middle) defenders.

Giants safeties stay while the MIKE linebacker drops deep.

After scanning the field, Brady threw the ball and targeted receiver Deion Branch. Branch, who ran an inside-breaking route, was open in the middle of the field, but the Patriots signal caller had to make a difficult throw. He got just enough air under the pass to put it through the hands of Philips…

Phillips reaches sky-high for Brady's pass.

But ultimately, the ball placement is what caused this pass to be incomplete, with Brady throwing it behind his intended target — something he doesn’t do very often.

Bad ball placement haunts Brady.

While it appeared that Branch ran freely into the middle of the field, the Patriots did not complete the pass that would have given them a significant gain.

This play was merely one example (and the best for diagramming) of many that the Giants had success on while in this coverage. The coverage concept switch-up administered by Fewell proved to be a big halftime adjustment because it allowed the Giants to become more athletic underneath, thus negating the Patriots’ matchup advantage and cutting down the yards after catch opportunities on quick passes thrown by Brady.

By now you’ve seen the picture above of Rob Gronkowski knowing that we’re all here for a good time, not a long time, and drowning his sorrows on stage with LMFAO during the Patriots Super Bowl party late Sunday night/very early Monday morning.

Gronk’s offseason detox process involves intoxication, and little clothing. Realizing that it’s only six months until training camp starts, Gronkowski was sure to start his offseason training program in the first hours of his free time. That’s dedication to your craft, kids.

The pictures were good enough, but now there’s a video circulating. (via Barstool Sports Boston)

There are actually several videos, and they’ll likely all provoke the same reaction from Patriots fans still itching to find their scapegoat. They’ll say something about Gronkowski not caring, and that he must be indifferent to a loss in a massively important game if he’s bouncing around on the dance floor hours later.

They’ll also object to his grinding, noting that his ankle looks like it’s in pretty good shape while he’s gyrating with blond girls. And they’re all just being fans.

Expecting every athlete to sink into some deep, dark hole of depression that lasts for days after a Super Bowl loss (or even your standard playoff loss) is wildly unrealistic and absurd. That does happen often, and it’s exactly what Tom Brady did when he was unable to do much more than stare at the floor for over 20 minutes in the Patriots locker room Sunday night.

But Brady is 34 years old, and he’s married, and has a family. Gronkowski is a rich 22-year-old kid, and his personal time is any time that he’s not playing football, or participating in any football-related activity. He’s entitled to do whatever he wants with that time, and during the evenings he’ll generally act like a muscular athlete in his early 20s with plenty of disposable income, and the ability to pick any girl at the bar.

Wouldn’t you?

Did Cam Stewart cash in on the first quarter safety? And did he parlay that wager with a Gisele on-camera sighting in the first quarter too?

Most importantly, did he roll with the obscure prop bet that predicted an obscene gesture at some point during the halftime performance? Those questions and more will likely be answered in this season’s final edition of the Red Heat podcast below.

Your Super Bowl hangover should be gone now, and the confetti has been cleaned up as we wait for more to fall during the Giants’ parade. So kill some time at work, and relive the game once more from the perspective of a few guys who either made or lost a sizable chunk of their paychecks.