
I think this nicely sums up how Jonathan Toews has been feeling in playoffs these days. C’mon dude, Zetterberg seems like a swell gent.
(S/t Austin1227)

I think this nicely sums up how Jonathan Toews has been feeling in playoffs these days. C’mon dude, Zetterberg seems like a swell gent.
(S/t Austin1227)
I can’t take credit for the Rask pun; Jake gives appropriate credit on the show. Today we discussed:
* How the Rangers beat the Bruins
* Kreider’s OT winner
* Rasks fall
* The Blackhawks get shutout
* Kings win a lot in LA
* And oh, so so much more
You can listen to it here:
Download it here, and subscribe on iTunes here. Facebook! Read the rest of this entry »
Last night the Dallas Stars may have possibly leaked the teams new logo, which they planned on unvieling along with new jerseys in a couple weeks. It came from the teams official app, and was deleted, but not before a fan could grab the screenshot you see above. At first blush, I think I looks pretty sharp and clean, and I like the green. And you?
(S/t to @DamnOldNylon)
***
Update: Confirmed. You can read more about their official new logo here. One more pic:
We’re one game away from another season of the Presidents’ Trophy winner not winning the Stanley Cup, which is going to perpetuate the narrative that certain teams are good in the regular season and not in the playoffs. Because the… sixth seed does so much better than the first seed in the postseason.
Living in Vancouver, I frequently get into arguments, both online and in person, with people who do believe that the playoffs reveal a team’s flaws. If that is true, it’s because against quality opponents a team is more likely to break or have weaknesses hammered. The Toronto Maple Leafs ate up the weak Boston Bruins’ defensive depth. The San Jose Sharks shut down the one line of the Vancouver Canucks and let the rest of the pieces fall into play. All teams have weaknesses, and all teams have strengths, and not always will one team’s strengths match up so perfectly against another’s weakness.
Last season during the Stanley Cup Playoffs, I put out a morning “noteworthy” column in the style of Trey Kerby’s “Things Of Note” posts on The Basketball Jones. This year I’ll be doing something similar (I think with some upgrades on my own previous attempts) using the NHL’s morning press release (“Stanley Cup of Joe,” they’re calling it), my own opinions, and some videos, .GIFs and appropriate pictures. Quoted passages are from the NHL press release.
***
Stayin’ alive
The Rangers won their fifth postseason overtime game in which they faced elimination. The last time they did so was in Game 7 of the 1994 Eastern Conference Final, when Stephane Matteau scored in double-overtime to defeat the Devils. Read the rest of this entry »
“That’s enough. F*** you! That’s enough. That’s enough! You’ve had your say.”
(S/t to Deadspin)
I understand that Brad Richards has not played well for the Rangers in the eyes of John Tortorella. There’s a reason he’s been demoted and given minimal minutes. But now it’s come to this:
Brad Richards says he is not playing tonight. He said Tortorella called him this morning to tell him.
— Dan Rosen (@drosennhl) May 23, 2013
“Nothing is over, work harder and try my best to never let it happen again,” Richards said.
— Dan Rosen (@drosennhl) May 23, 2013
Re. Richards, this was brewing. He was on 4th line b/c he wasn’t playing well enough to be in top-9. Next logical step was the press box.
— Dan Rosen (@drosennhl) May 23, 2013
With this move, we’re left to believe one or a couple of a few things about the well-compensated captain’s situation:
A) John Tortorella is right right in his assessment that the Rangers are better served with Brad Richards not playing at all. They’re better off with Arron Asham, or Mats Zuccarello or whoever they decide is more deserving than him.
B) John Tortorella is right that he’s not playing well, but wrong in healthy scratching him because he’s at least better than whichever 12th forward you plug in for him.
C) John Tortorella is entirely wrong (and has likely hurt the play of Richards, or at least the team, with his management of him).
D) John Tortorella likes attention.
Personally, I subscribe to B. I also subscribe to C and D, though. “Over-coaching” is a word that springs to mind.
The point that I made on the podcast about Richards was pretty basic: if you’re John Tortorella, you either believe that Brad Richards is a good NHL player playing poorly, in which case you should play him because good players who’ve been playing badly will have an over-correction of sort to get back to their average (or at least will play closer to how they normally do),
OR,
You believe the player playing badly is just a bad hockey player, in which case this “bad” is normal and you can expect to see more of the same and therefore no correction.
Brad Richards is not a “bad” hockey player. Quite good, in fact.
If Richards has been playing bad (it’s tough to tell given his usage of late, tough to get into a game as a skill guy playing eight minutes), then it’s only a matter of time before he has a good game. By putting him in the stands, you avoid getting the guy’s bounce-back games, piss him off in the process, and in Tortorella’s case, probably make one of your last Become The Center of Attention moves of your time with the Rangers.
I think making him a healthy scratch is intentionally fielding a lesser line-up, which is putting yourself ahead of the team as coach, which is selfish and wrong.
And you?