More than anyone else, NHL general managers control the record of their teams. They decide on the on-ice roster, they choose coaches, they hire and fire scouts, trainers and control the destiny of virtually every employee on the hockey operations side of an NHL franchise.
Each manager has different circumstances; some inherit Sidney Crosby while others have to rebuild a destitute team, some are blessed with the authority to spend to the salary cap every year while others have to make every penny count. That said, the most important thing in assessing a general manager is his team’s win/loss record.
With that in mind, I’ve put together a chart showing the 30 NHL general managers and their win/loss record with their current team. I’ve ranked them by winning percentage, using the following formula:
Winning Percentage = (Wins + Ties/2) / Total Games
Shootout and overtime losses are counted as losses by this measure, and have no positive impact on winning percentage. This was necessary for accurate measurement, since some general managers were running teams back when losing games in overtime didn’t earn any points, and besides it makes the 0.500 mark more meaningful. Please note: general manager records are just with their current team, meaning that while Brian Burke had a great track record with Vancouver and Anaheim, his place on this list is determined solely by his record with Toronto.
| Name | Team | All-Time Record | Winning Percentage |
| Ken Holland | Detroit | 588-324-72 | 0.634 |
| Stan Bowman | Chicago | 52-30 | 0.634 |
| Doug Wilson | San Jose | 291-189-12 | 0.604 |
| Mike Gillis | Vancouver | 94-70 | 0.573 |
| Lou Lamoriello | New Jersey | 873-630-179 | 0.572 |
| Ray Shero | Pittsburgh | 186-142 | 0.567 |
| Darryl Sutter | Calgary | 219-184-7 | 0.543 |
| Darcy Regier | Buffalo | 483-423-78 | 0.530 |
| Greg Sherman | Colorado | 43-39 | 0.524 |
| Larry Pleau | St. Louis | 428-400-74 | 0.516 |
| Peter Chiarelli | Boston | 168-160 | 0.512 |
| Don Maloney | Phoenix | 124-122 | 0.504 |
| George McPhee | Washington | 458-457-69 | 0.501 |
| Bryan Murray | Ottawa | 123-123 | 0.500 |
| Pierre Gauthier | Montreal | 11-11 | 0.500 |
| Bob Murray | Anaheim | 72-75 | 0.490 |
| Jim Rutherford | Carolina | 527-558-111 | 0.487 |
| David Poile | Nashville | 364-396-60 | 0.480 |
| Glen Sather | N.Y. Rangers | 337-375-26 | 0.474 |
| Chuck Fletcher | Minnesota | 38-44 | 0.463 |
| Paul Holmgren | Philadelphia | 148-172 | 0.463 |
| Joe Nieuwendyk | Dallas | 37-45 | 0.451 |
| Scott Howson | Columbus | 107-139 | 0.435 |
| Dean Lombardi | Los Angeles | 139-189 | 0.424 |
| Garth Snow | N.Y. Islanders | 135-193 | 0.412 |
| Brian Burke | Toronto | 56-85 | 0.397 |
| Steve Tambellini | Edmonton | 65-99 | 0.396 |
| Randy Sexton | Florida | 32-50 | 0.390 |
Tampa Bay has yet to name a general manager, while Rick Dudley was named earlier this summer in Atlanta, but his team has yet to play any games.
Lots of surprises on this list, at least for me (did you know that Jim Rutherford has been the Sporting News’ executive of the year twice?) and I’ll be going into ranking NHL G.M.’s a little later on, but I wanted to briefly make a few points about the list above.
- Larry Pleau has transferred a lot of his duties over to the Blues’ president, John Davidson, but he’s been credited with the Blues’ record over his entire time as G.M.
- Obviously, Pierre Gauthier is mostly playing with the hand he was dealt by Bob Gainey.
- Paul Holmgren only has a losing record because he took over as G.M. eight games into the 2006-07 season, a debacle that saw both coach Ken Hitchcock and long-time G.M. Bobby Clarke leave the organization. If we remove that season from consideration, his winning percentage jumps to 0.516.



Looking forward to the G.M. rankings. Keep up the great work Jon!
Imagine what Holmgren’s record would look like if only he had acquired a half-decent goaltender!
I think your missing one of the best stats though and thats cups won. And looking at what kind of salary mess did the GM walk into and how many moves have they made to get out of the mess. I think it would be interesting to see, after all Holland did kind of just got lucky the core of the team was already there and their was a ton of player development in the system and I’m not taking anything from him he’s done a great job since taking over.