Regardless of your age, if you’re a hockey fan then the Florida Panthers haven’t mattered a whole lot in your life. Save for a Cinderella Stanley Cup Final run, only to be cut down by the Colorado Avalanche, and 223 games with Pavel Bure in tow – the Panthers have been one of the NHL’s most consistent punch lines. Could the dark days of the Panthers be coming to an end? ESPN released their organizational rankings on Thursday (subscription required), and it’s none other than the Panthers that top the list at No. 1:

The Panthers have the most blue-chippers coming down the pipeline, and Jonathan Huberdeau (third overall, 2011) leads a long list of players who will play, and well, at the NHL level. He is a leader, loaded with desire and talent, and has a knack for making big plays. Eric Gudbranson (third overall, 2010) is ready to make the jump from juniors to the NHL, and there’s also Quinton Howden (25th overall, 2010), and Nick Bjugstad (19th overall, 2010). All the Panthers need now is time to let their top prospects develop.

We can’t really act all that surprised as the Panthers had their fingerprints all over last January’s World Junior Championship. A completely retooled roster courtesy of Dale Tallon combined with a rich system should give the Panthers a realistic chance of taking a step forward in the next couple of years. Hell, maybe they’ll even make the playoffs one of these seasons.

Quickly:

Winnipeg Jets taking heat from Weakerthans’ singer John K. Samson over military-esque logo design. [Sporting News]

Kostitsyn shouldn’t blame Martin for struggles. [Pro Hockey Talk]

Brent Burns is a big Harry Potter fan, and that shit is permanent:

Image via Brent Burns’ Twitter

Three Legends confirmed for NHL 12. [Game Trailers]

A look at some free agency leftovers. [Dirty Dangle]

Sabres sign Gragnani to one-year deal. [Sabres Edge]

More on the Angry Birds goalie mask and how it came to be. [Puck Daddy]

Three minutes of Frans Nielsen goals set to Queen

Stick tap Lighthouse Hockey

Comments (3)

  1. Is it just me or does the ESPN list seem to just be ranking organizations based on prospects picked in the first two rounds? That’s not very informative. I’d rather stick to organizational ranks done by the likes of Hockey Prospectus where they actually take in to account the players growth and potential and not just where they were drafted.

  2. *Puck Prospectus

  3. I prefer to rely on HockeysFuture, but that might be because they ranked the Kings #1 last time they updated the ranking (pre-Schenn trade)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *