Wither Pernell Karl

Somewhere behind Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane celebrating a goal scored on Peter Budaj is PK Subban getting blamed for another goal against.

Admittedly, I’m using a disproportionate amount of words in this space discussing the Montreal Canadiens and their season, but can I really help it if they’re so damn interesting? We’re not even into the new year, and the team has already been faced with regression, trades, firings and a language controversy.

What I can’t get away from is the never-ending storyline that seems to creep up with Montreal’s #76.

The news that PK Subban, the young and impressionable probably-future-superstar of les Habitants was a healthy scratch for last Thursday’s loss to the Winnipeg Jets could have come as a surprise to the hockey fan not keeping up with everything Montreal this season, but to some, it’s just business as usual. The season has been weird, and good judgment has been cast aside for emotional judgment. It isn’t just the team. I was amazed, despite not having watch the Canadiens’ loss to the Tampa Bay Lightning on Thursday, at the amount of criticism directed at Pernell Karl, from both Habs fans and non-Habs fans, on Twitter after the game concluded.

The last thing that Randy Cunneyworth could have done to endear himself to the Montreal faithful in the middle of a losing streak is to do precisely what he did last Thursday. He relegated the polarizing fan favourite to the press box. Subban has also been statistically one of the Canadiens’ better defensemen. He’s been playing tough minutes, through Thursday (the numbers have certainly updated by now) he had a 1.356 Corsi Rel QoC, which measures quality of competition, and had a 45.6% offensive zone start rate. Despite this, his Corsi number (shot attempt differential, excellent for measuring possession) was the best on the Canadiens blueline, and the only one that was positive.

Of course he’d score a goal in his first game back from being a scratch, prompting numerous “I told you sos” everywhere, and of course he’d be an apparent negative factor in the Habs’ subsequent loss, prompting numerous “I also told you sos” on the other side of the coin.

And then there’s this:

It’s not odd in the slightest that Subban would be the target of this type of criticism, because he’s the easy, recognizable target. Is Josh Gorges (minus-2 against Tampa) really not worth bringing up for the sake of a few retweets and a crude diving joke? Did Travis Moen (an astounding minus-3, as if it meant anything, against Tampa) really not play poorly enough to catch Kevin Paul Dupont’s eye?

This hat is #onions.

PK Subban against Tampa Bay was average statistically, but people need to draw away from the fantastic lows and highs that will come with Subban being the most visible player in one of hockey’s most visible market. People forget to pay attention to the two key aspects here: One is that he’s 22 years old. Two, with regards to the previous point, is that PK Subban is on his way to becoming one of the best defensemen in the NHL at controlling the play on both offense and defense.

Yes, like many members of the Montreal Canadiens, he has struggled recently. His fall has been symbolic of the Montreal season, but this is no more attributable to anything specific about PK or the type of player he is. This is just something that happens to young hockey players sometimes, and it would probably happen more often if 22-year old defensemen were playing 22 minutes every night. This is what makes Cunneyworth’s decision to sit him so interesting. It may be the best thing for the young player’s development, if there were key discipline issues in play (I’m not close to the team, but I get to go see them this week) but it certainly isn’t good for the team:

Because at least when Jacques Martin sat Subban, he wasn’t doing so with Subban as arguably the best defenseman on the team. The situation has changed. The team is in the middle of a playoff race and they simply can’t afford to teach their players lessons in discipline as that 8th seed drifts further away, and come back the next night and put the kid’s face right up against the grindstone again.

Just let him play, and if it’s a concern, don’t make him play 8 shifts at even strength against the NHL’s goal scoring leader. You aren’t doing him or yourself any favours. If he’s struggling, take away two or three of his minutes, not twenty-two. There is no need for PK Subban to be forced to jump into the shark-filled waters with his coach nursing an open wound.

Comments (10)

  1. I’m no PK Subban fan but I find his recent scapegoating odd. I think scratching young guys can be a good motivator and all but that’s on a team where the player in question is the weakest link. Seems to me the Habs are a complete mess so I’m not exactly sure Subban was singled out like that (my first thought was he wasn’t working hard in practices or had an attitude problem but nobody reported anything like that).

    • Subban is actually one of the hardest workers in practice from what I’ve heard. He even does so with such intensity that he’s been criticized for being too intense.

      I think it’s Cunney trying to send a message that PK needs to be more than just a solid stay at home D, he needs to be the superstar that he is. Cunneyworth knows PK is capable of better even though he is playing well and so does PK. It’s nothing to worry about imo.

  2. Thank you for writing this. It needed to be said badly. Montreal isn’t losing because of PK Subban. I wish we had 5 more of him on our defense. The reason Montreal isn’t winning is because they only have 5 forwards with more points than him. They don’t score enough to cover up any mistakes. There are 22 Teams in the NHL who score more per game and the Habs are in 25th place in the league. The equation is very simple. PK and Price get so much blame for MTL losses and its ridiculous.

    Cammalleri makes $6M and is on pace for 48 points.
    Gionta makes $5M and is on pace for 37.
    Gomez makes $7M and would have 17 points on the year – assuming they even let him play if he becomes healthy.
    Markov makes $5M and hasn’t played a game.

    I can’t think of another team in the league who could have $23M spent on players who would combine for 100 total points on a year and make the playoffs. The media and fans want to crucify a 22 year old who plays 24 Minutes per game against the #1 line of the other team for being a – 1 on the year? Especially since that makes him the 8th best on the team, and 2nd best among all the defenders on his team?

    That is simply bat sh!t crazy. I love my team but this is nuts.

  3. i feel like some of the blame he takes is because of tsn and mike richards(the player for the kings, not the tsn radio host) they did a story saying he was too cocky or some garbage like that, and now thats how everyones see’s him,

    no one complained about subban when he was wearing a team canada jersey

  4. Hemsky for Subban!!

  5. looks good on him & the Habs …. look get what you give … I hope they end up 6 last …

  6. Never put much stock into anything GlobeKPD tweets. It’s usually 99% disgusting vitriol, and from a professional who has acted like your average unprofessional internet troll.

    As for PK, it’s called growing pains. We gladly take the good with the bad and look forward to his career with this team. Right now there are way too many veterans not contributing enough to help the young guys out.

  7. There aren’t many young defensemen who can come into the league and play at such a high level. Sophmore slumps seem to be far more common among D-men than forwards. I wouldn’t be too worried about Subban. I would be far more worried about the moves Gauthier has made. The guy has got to go.

  8. I wanted to follow up and let you know how considerably I treasured discovering this blog today. I will consider it an honor to do things at my office and be able to operate on the tips provided on your website and also be involved in visitors’ reviews like this. Should a position connected with guest publisher become offered at your end, please let me know.

  9. This may not be the best place to ask this, but, I want to track down an investment advisor that was my parents’ retirement manager. I’m totally stuck here because I want to use the same advisors that my parents did I’m not seeing them in any of the local directories online. Carlton Financial Group – 106 Mission Ct #701 Franklin, TN 37067 phone (615) 794-2536 Does anyone know of a directory or service that makes it easy for me to search for them?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *