New York block a lot of shots:

When you dissect the data of the 1 vs. 8 series in the East, you notice something is strange. It was a very low-event sort of series and not a terrific amount of quality chances, just a lot of pucks hopping over sticks and blocked shots from in tight.

Lots of those actually, particularly in the Rangers end. New York had a 6-chance advantage over the Senators in scoring chances (counted by my friend Rob Pettapiece) at even strength, despite being massively out-played in possession. At 5-on-5, Ottawa had 366 shot attempts to New York’s 264.

So why the discrepancy in scoring chances? Because John Tortorella loves shot blocks. The Rangers blocked 116 shots to Ottawa’s 59, a decisive advantage not only numerically, but also as a percentage of total shots taken (32% to 22%). This was prominently on display in Game Seven of the series: the Sens fired 55 shots at Henrik Lundqvist 5-on-5, but only 33 of them got through. Am I usually a staunch advocate of shot blocks? Heck no, but the Rangers found success in limiting Ottawa’s chances by getting their bodies or sticks in every shooting lane.

Of course, then you leave yourself liable to a bad bounce. They did only beat the 8 seed by a single goal…

The Boston Bruins aren’t invincible:

Well, maybe they are, who knows. Back in January, the Bruins were shooting 11.4% as a team, severely impacting our ability to recognize what this team was: an above-average possession team with terrific goaltending. Neutralize the goaltending advantage by having somebody play just as hot at the other end, like Braden Holtby, and anything can happen.

Let’s not be too quick to humanize the Bruins, however. They were defending champions for a reason and a superior team to Washington in the series. Unfortunately for them, every game was close, and sometimes in close games, you lose in overtime.

Holtby’s even strength save percentage was .940 in the series, compared to Tim Thomas’ mere human .924.

Florida, Florida, Florida:

This was an awful series. Neither team was at all good and outside of a few decent plays, even the double OT in Game 7 wasn’t all that mesmerizing. The teams traded dump-ins and bad ice prevented any team from gaining any sort of offensive advantage.

By the way, Florida, who made the playoffs on the heels of 18 overtime losses, conveniently bowed out on the strength of two extra time goals by New Jersey. The Panthers’ OT record in the regular season was 1-7.

Philadelphia’s scorers are going to have an easy time again:

The Flyers absolutely torched Marc-André Fleury, who had a regular season even strength save percentage of .915. Martin Brodeur was the only regular starting goaltender who was lower, putting up a .911 in his 59 games.

We saw the Flyers walk over Pittsburgh in the first round, and they get to go up against another goaltender who may be a little suspect. Brodeur has seen a lot of post-season success in his life, but he’s also seen his share of post-season collapses. I think the Flyers are in for another big series. Maybe not as big, but you know.

Additionally, the hero of Round One was Mikkel Boedker.

The Los Angeles Kings were severely underrated:

Not many pundits picked the Los Angeles Kings to beat the Vancouver Canucks. According to this, just 15% of them were brave enough to go L.A. Yet the Kings were a dominant possession team and were one of the best in the league after having picked up Jeff Carter at the trade deadline.

Also, this will mark the second consecutive year the Canucks will have lost in the playoffs to the Vezina Trophy-winning goaltender (prospective, at this point, but I don’t see how Quick doesn’t win the award). That’s a real shame. It almost makes you forget that they lost in the two years before that to reverse-Vezina winners Antti Niemi and Nikolai Khabibulin.

L.A won in five despite running into .940 goaltending. That’s impressive.

I didn’t watch the St. Louis and San Jose series at all:

Actually, I watched Games 1 and 2. Was the rest of it any good?

Nashville/Phoenix will be a good series:

I think people may be overstating how defensively Nashville and Phoenix play. Sure, the teams were dead-last and second-to-last in shots for per game in the first round, but they also ranked pretty low in shots given up as well, meaning that there was at least something going on in these games. Whenever I counted scoring chances for either of these two teams this season, there was always a vicious amount.

Whether they have any success or not with the shots they do take from the inside, there’s no denying that they do create wonderful chances and give up a bunch. Can they help it their goalies each have potential to steal a game or two?

Detroit lost playing their own game:

Detroit are known for playing a puck possession game that results in a lot of shots at the opposition net, a lot of cycling, and generally keeping the puck out of their own end. Well, they succeeded in doing that this series, but as Nashville has done all year, they find a way to get it done, despite being outshot 85-124 at 5-on-5 this series.

The Predators have been turning opposing goaltenders to dust all season. Just Boston and Tampa Bay had higher shooting rates. Will their luck ever turn, or will we have to get used to the Predators as a juggernaut?

Comments (22)

  1. I went to all 3 of the Sens home games… and you don’t know how frustrating it was to hear some of the crowd yell “shooooot”. I’m sitting there thinking, “what the hell people, have you watched any of the series? Do you see the blocked shots? Do you understand that you have to start forcing the odd fake shot in order to around the first layer of blocking. FUCKING FUCK I FEEL LIKE I’M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!!!”

    Good series. :)

  2. Here are the total goals scored (and goals per game) in each playoff series:

    Pittsburgh vs Philadelphia: 56 Goals (9.3/Game)
    Panthers vs Devils: 35 Goals (5/Game)
    Phoenix vs Chicago: 29 Goals (4.8/Game)
    Boston vs Washington: 31 Goals (4.4/Game)
    St Louis vs San Jose: 22 Goals (4.4/Game)
    Nashville vs Detroit: 22 Goals (4.4/Game)
    Vancouver vs Los Angeles: 20 Goals (4/Game)
    New York vs Ottawa: 27 Goals (3.9/Game)

    Wow, that Panthers/Devils series sure must have been awful, what with all the goal scoring and a ‘few decent plays.’ I guess there needs to be either a million goals or no goal scoring at all for you to find a playoff series entertaining. The 6-3 matches in both conferences were by far the best hockey to watch.

  3. Care to share why you think Quick is a lock for the Vezina?

    • have you watched hockey in 2012?

      • Actually about 6 or 7 games a week all year. So yeah.

        Quick’s numbers are basically the same as Lundqvists. I don’t see how Quick is a lock to win it.

    • Well, not lock, but I think he’s been more important to the Kings’ success than any player has been for their team. He’d have gotten my Hart selection, too, if I got to decide these things.

      • Importance to the team shouldn’t really effect Vezina voting though. That is what the Hart is for. The Vezina is for the best goalie, not the best goalie that is most important to his team.

        I do agree with you. I would have picked Quick over Lundqvist for Hart (and I’m a Rangers fan).

  4. Quick probably SHOULD win the Vezina, but Lundqvist’s east-coast edge probably gives it to him. They’re basically in a statistical dead heat.

    • What East coast edge? Exactly 50% of the voters are from the WC.

      • The West coast media watch east coast games. The East coast media stay up for far fewer western games. It’s just a fact – they complain about “having to stay up for xxx game” all the time. It has an impact.

      • its not that kind of edge
        its the fact that Lundqvist has to deal with the top 8 scorers of the nhl more than quick does
        FYI the top 8 scorers of the nhl are all from the East so Lundqvist does have an edge. This is coming from a Rangers fan but also a Avon Old Farms student (where Quick went to highschool) so I’m happy with either one.

    • I also think Lundqvist has a few other things going for him. He’s been in the running for a few years, and it just seems like there’s been a movement all year long that this is his turn.

      • Sometimes that works against you though. The buzz for him was definitely there all year, but the buzz for Quick seems to have picked up immensely towards the last 3rd of the season and most of the talk lately has been about how good Quick has been and how under rated he was for most of the season. That flurry of last minute media coverage certainly will sit in the back of voters’ minds.

        Point being there’s a lot of talk about Quick that’s fresh in people’s heads.

  5. I think calling Florida – NJ an “awful” series is a bit harsh. There’s plenty that went on that was worth writing about, but I get it – Two small market teams, no one cares on the national level.

    But what else could you ask for in a series? Goaltending drama. A blown lead just about every night. A game 7 that goes into Double OT. Rats everywhere. A twitter war between the president of the Panthers and a random Devils fan.

    I’ll grant you, it was a very gritty series as being opposed to flashy, but other series were similar, so why the hate?

    But no, let’s read instead about how many goals Marty is going to give up in this series. Because Bryz is _so_ much more reliable.

    • Anything can happen in a short series – and each is where they are for a reason – but neither Bryz or Brodeur showed any consistency or play that would inspire confidence that they can carry a team for 7 games.

  6. Thanks for owning up to the fact you didn’t watch the SJS/STL series.. I hope LA will do the same, and many other media-types. The more that Blues team gets put under the radar the better they tend to play.. (Best record in the NHL since Hitchcock took over, and still going… Hey how about them Penguins? Or any Canadian team?? No..)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *