Rick Nash has had his name linked to a lot of teams in the last few months. He’s not quite in Shane Doan territory yet or anything like that, but the list of suitors for the services of Columbus’ disgruntled not-worth-the-trouble winger has ballooned, dipped and grown again several times.

There is one thing all those suitors have largely had in common, however: Very few are Canadian. Apart from Ottawa, which built a complex deal for the Blue Jackets captain only to have it scuttled because he has no interest in going there, it seems exactly zero of the remaining six Canadian teams have even mounted an appeal to Scott Howson or Nash. The reason for this is simple. Rick Nash’s contract a full no-movement clause for the next few years and also because he has a list of teams for which he would find it acceptable to play. That list, predictably, has no Canadian teams on it.

The reason for this, according to cool-beard-haver Thomas Bink of Toronto-based discerning men’s publication Toro Magazine, is because Nash can’t handle the pressure of playing in a Canadian city, or, judging by the quality of the Photoshop job at the top of the linked article, has died.

Despite the Senators offering a “king’s ransom” for Nash, as Bing put it, he refused to go there because he’s afraid to be scrutinized in ways he would not be in places like Ottawa, or Toronto, or Montreal, or Calgary, or Edmonton, or Vancouver, or Winnipeg. Now granted, Columbus isn’t exactly a major media market with a hyper-aggressive media. As far as I can tell, the team has one paper that covers and breaks stories on it regularly. But at the same time, the assertion that Nash is afraid to go to a Canadian team because he’s shy of “the spotlight of centre stage,” to clumsily smash theater metaphors together, is frankly silly. Here’s why:

1) Look where he actually wants to go

Bink shoots his own awful argument in the foot in this story, though to be fair it takes him 11 paragraphs to get there. Nash wants to go to six teams, all of them in the U.S.: “Philadelphia, Detroit, New York, Pittsburgh, San Jose and Boston.”

Now granted, San Jose and Detroit have some passive media members, and Pittsburgh’s will really only get on a player if they’re noticeably bad every game. But the rest of that list? They’re ruthless.

Bink must have missed the entire season where the Philadelphia media attacked Ilya Bryzgalov with torches and pitchforks drawn after every three-goal performance, and was clearly on holiday when he was gutted by reporters both local and national for revealing he wasn’t starting the Winter Classic. Boston’s just got down driving Tim Thomas — a Conn Smythe and two-time Vezina winner, Stanley Cup champion, borderline Hall of Famer and arguably the best goaltender the team has ever had — out of town because he’s a Tea Party lunatic. The New York media has literally broken dozen of players in a number of sports.

But yes, the Canadian spotlight would be unbearable. Which brings us to the second reason Nash isn’t actually scared of playing in Canada.

2) A Good Canadian Boy coming home would be showered in adulation

It’s not easy to play in Canada. Ask Roberto Luongo, who’s being driven to the airport by everyone in Vancouver and shoved on the first plane to Florida for no good reason. … Hmm, what’s that? The reason is the team has a cheaper, arguably better young goaltender ready to take his job? Ah. I see. Well then what about Winnipeg, where no one thought this season’s dismal performance was in any way acceptable and people are being held to account? … Oh they didn’t care at all? And everyone acted like they were a great team despite finishing four points ahead of Toronto? Interesting. Well surely Edmonton, where they’ve been terrible forever. … A new rink? And the media’s pushing it? For HOW much money? I see. And they extended Tambellini and no one raised a stink? Right.

Okay. Well how about Calgary? … Most passive media presence in the country which doesn’t seem to care if the team is going nowhere? Montreal, then. Ruthless media. Just vicious. … No, I don’t think Rick Nash speaks French. THAT would be their biggest problem? Okay. Toronto? … Oh yeah, they haven’t even succeeded in running Brian Burke out of town yet. Well surely Ottawa, then. … Being realistic about building for the future you say?

Well, what of… wait I’m out of Canadian cities with NHL teams.

3) What do the teams on his list have in common?

Again, it is in that 11th paragraph that Bink seems to achieve some level of clarity.

“All are Stanley Cup contenders with all-star centres that can get him the puck,” he writes.

This, to me, seems to be the only two considerations Nash has in mind. Let’s go in order of the teams Bink listed as Nash’s preferred destinations and what they have to offer:

Philadelphia: Playing with Claude Giroux; Have advanced out of the first round for each of the last four seasons, including a Stanley Cup Final appearance against the buzzsaw Chicago Blackhawks

Detroit: Playing with Pavel Datsyuk; Literally made the playoffs in all but two years of Rick Nash’s entire life, and have only been bounced in the first round twice since the lockout; Are the Detroit Red Wings

New York: Playing with Brad Richards; Made the Eastern Conference Finals last season; Have great coaching, exceptional young players at all skating positions, and world-class goaltending

Pittsburgh: Playing with Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin; Won a Stanley Cup three seasons ago and seem likely to be one of the best teams in the conference for years

San Jose: Playing with Joe Thornton, with whom Nash is close friends; Well-respected team even if it seems to be on the decline

Boston: Playing with Patrice Bergeron, with whom Nash played in the Olympics, and Tyler Seguin; Won a Cup two seasons ago, probably the best on-paper team in the Eastern Conference

And now let’s compare that with all the Canadian teams, based on where they finished last season:

Vancouver: Playing with the Sedins; Won the Presidents’ Trophy two years in a row; Went to a Stanley Cup Final in 2011 and lost in seven games; Will be good for a while

Ottawa: Playing with Jason Spezza; Tied for 15th-most points in the league (fewer regulation and overtime wins than Florida); Made the playoffs for the twice in the last three years, both were first-round bounce-outs

Calgary: Playing with ???; Finished 17th in the league; Missed the playoffs in each of the last three years, looks poised to do so again in 2013

Winnipeg: Playing with Olli Jokinen?; Finished tied for 21st in the league; Are the friggin’ Thrashers; Missed the playoffs the last five years

Toronto: Playing with well-known NHL center James van Riemsdyk; Finished tied for 25th in the league; Might ask Nash to play goal; Haven’t made the playoffs the last seven years

Montreal: Playing with Scott Gomez; Finished 28th in the league; Missed the playoffs last season by a wide margin, haven’t improved much in free agency

Edmonton: Playing with Ryan Nugent-Hopkins; Finished 29th in the league; Missed the playoffs the last six years; Still too young to be any good

Well hey look at that. It’s almost like Bink was right: Nash has made the playoffs once in his career and was forced back out again in four whole games, so wants to go to good teams with good centers, and not bad teams with bad centers. Wow. What a selfish jerk. He’s The Lebron James of Hockey.

4) There is a thing called the salary cap.

Finally, let’s also note that Bink earlier in the piece dances around the cap implications of any Nash deal.

“Only a dozen or so teams can actually afford to pick up his salary.”

To say nothing of the fact that, unlike most long-term deals given to star players today, the money owed to Nash actually increases as he ages, meaning that teams looking to save money on the deal even as they absorb his contract will find themselves going wanting. If a dozen teams can afford to actually pay Nash, which ones do you suppose they are? I’ll just go off the top of my head: Boston (no cap space), Buffalo (not on the list), Calgary (no cap space/terrible), Chicago (no cap space), Edmonton (probably don’t have the appetite to take on that deal given what they’ll have to pay all the kids in the next five years/terrible), Detroit (makes perfect sense), Los Angeles (maybe), Montreal (no cap space/terrible), New York (makes sense), Ottawa (not good enough), Philadelphia (makes sense), Pittsburgh (no cap space), San Jose (no cap space), Toronto (terrible), Vancouver (no cap space).

That’s 15 teams, but you get the point.

5) Scott Howson is a god damn maniac

You’ll notice I think about three teams out of that 15-team list can probably afford Nash both under the salary cap and on paper. All are on his list of acceptable teams. That’s good news. Three teams bidding.

Oh but the guy running that bidding war is delusional. He wants two NHL-ready players and two prospects at the very least. Who has the appetite to pay that? Maybe Philadelphia because Paul Holmgren apparently doesn’t care about that kind of thing. That’s a big maybe though.

Bink ends his post by noting that many athletes who opted not to take a job in Canada have gone without a lot of career success.

“But what goes around comes around,” he wrote, like a child. “Lindros never won a Stanley Cup after refusing to play for the Quebec Nordiques, while the Nords went on to win two Cups as the Colorado Avalanche. Francis played a total of five playoff games in a career that fizzled out in China. And true to form, Heatley was a bit player in San Jose before being traded to Minnesota. He’s yet to win anything.”

In closing, I think it would be really cool if Bink could remind us of the last time a Canadian team won a Stanley Cup. Thanks, I’ll hang up and listen.

Comments (29)

  1. Lambert is insufferable. How many words did he just commit to ranting about the opinion of one writer? What a waste of Kbs.

  2. “In closing, I think it would be really cool if Bink could remind us of the last time a Canadian team won a Stanley Cup. Thanks, I’ll hang up and listen.”

    Every year, considering +90% of all teams are Canadian.

    • You may want to look at that 90% number again. The Kings had less than 60% this year.

    • You my friend are as the average person likes to call an idiot…
      just to completely destroy your amazing “statistic” here is the nationality of players breakdown for the last 5 Stanley Cup winning teams:

      2011-12 LA Kings: Canadians: 16
      Americans: 8
      Other: 3
      2010-11 Bos Bruins: Canadians: 20
      Americans: 6
      Other: 5
      2009-10 Chi Blackhawks: Canadians: 19
      Americans: 5
      Other: 7
      2008-09 Pitts Penguins: Canadians: 20
      Americans: 12
      Other: 7
      2007-08 Det Red Wings: Canadians: 13
      Americans: 6
      Other: 14

      So if you look at that the Kings team was 59.26% Canadian, the Bruins were 64.52% Canadian, Blackhawks were 61.29% Canadian, Penguins were 51.28% Canadian, and the Wings were 39.39% Canadian.

      So your stat is so flawed I don’t even want to comment on the stupidity behind it, just thought I would give you a wakeup to the real makeup of the Stanley Cup winning teams… Yes Canadians make up most of the rosters but not anywhere close to 90% (which you even hinted to being more… FACEPLAM), but closer to 60% (either a bit more or quite a bit less). And now I hope you enjoyed your education :)

      • Jesus… ONLY 60% That’s barely ANYTHING!!! No wait, it’s not.

        I could be wrong, but I believe Damian may have been using something called hyperbole, only THE GREATEST thing to ever be used ever…. ever.

        • The difference between 60 and 90 is MASSIVE so comparably 60 is nothing compared to 90… for instance a starting line up with regards to skaters is 18… 90% of those people being Canadian would leave max 2 players being non-Canadian while with 60% that would leave at least 7… that my friend is A HUGE DIFFERENCE. I never said earlier that did not mean that 60% was not a large amount of the make up, but to over-exaggerate numbers that much just shows the person has 0 knowledge of what they speak of. In terms of trying to add any credibility to a comment trying to say that every year they win. After all look at that Wings team I posted… not even half the squad is made up of Canadians.

  3. Forgot about taxes dog. He would lose a TON more cash coming to any Canadian city.

    • This actually isn’t true. Most states have taxes quite comparable to Canada. The exclusion being Texas and Florida, and I don’t see him going to Florida, Tampa, or Dallas.

      Bro.

      • Not compared to Ontario or BC actually. Both have quite high taxes. If he went to Montreal he would be luckier. All around costs for living in Ontario and BC is generally higher.
        Also think how much more food he could eat in the US for the same cost. :O

        • Montreal has *the* highest taxes in the league, while Calgary and Edmonton are among the lowest (I think 3rd and 4th, but definitely bottom 7).

          • There is a lot more tax breaks in Montreal as well though for anyone doing anything… they are the province with the most funding so in terms of any player that moves with a family it would actually be better outside of the Alberta provinces where if they also wanted to start a business on the side they would get some nice breaks.
            However once you add in living costs and all then Ontario and BC rank around the top.

  4. Wow you’re a fucking idiot lambert

  5. Do you proof anything you put out? The number of typo’s and simple errors in this piece is ridiculous to the point of distraction.

    As for the article, some solid arguments, but you always find a way to throw in a couple of lines to remind me why I made a point of avoiding your stuff at yahoo, I’m disappointed to see that you’re writing here. Fortunately the Score has Bourne to balance it out.

  6. Wow! Glad I just wasted my time reading this. Maybe I’ll print it off to go to the bathroom!

  7. Lambert’s one-track mind churns out yet another boring screed. The poor kid is so obsessed with trolling Canadians he wastes valuable time that could be better used to angrily rant about other people’s taste in music.

  8. Weird, I don’t see the problem with anything he said, I agree with it all actually. Obviously something is wrong with me.

  9. Off the top of your head doesn’t work for legitimate articles, Ryan. Let’s check that cap-space you say some teams don’t have:

    Boston – 277,857 – you are correct
    Calgary – 3,531,668 – you are correct (although players sent to CBJ could open enough room)
    Chicago – 7,754,872 – you are incorrect as Howson said he wants NHL forwards, so shipping players to CBJ would make more than enough room for Nash
    Montreal – 6,302,024 – you are incorrect, again, do you understand how trades open up cap-space?
    Pittsburgh – 9,936,667 – you are incorrect – they could even acquire him straight up, so absolutely ZERO fact-checking on your end
    San Jose – 5,570,833 – you are somewhat correct – again, SJ could open some space on sending the right players to CBJ, but at least now it would take some maneuvering

    For someone who writes so pretentiously, it would help if the portion of your arguments in which you throw out “facts” were actually based on facts. Of the 6 teams you say have no cap-space to acquire Nash: 2-3 realistically don’t (BOS, CGY, SJS), 2-3 could realistically make it work (CHI, MTL, SJS), and 1has more than enough space to absorb his contract without moving any signed players (PIT)

    All you had to do was either check your facts, or throw in some logical assumptions for some of the teams, such as, PIT will have to lock up Malkin and Letang in a few years (if they chose Nash over Malkin, they’d still have room – it would be unwise, but they could do it). Chicago also has some contracts coming up that would require raises, but nothing to the caliber of a Malkin or a Letang, so they could acquire Nash and be fine cap-wise. Same with San Jose.

    Points 1 and 3 are opinions based on evidence (1) and facts(3). Points 2 and 5 are opinion-based and can be argued either way. But you use Point 4 as a factual point, but you don’t use facts.

  10. who cares…nash one trick pony…..terrific offensive player…..but probably doesnt know the what his own teams goalies name is……..not worth what he is gonna be trded for

    • I think your thinking of Phil Kessel… not sure if you noticed but Nash has played in defensive minded systems…

    • Also, none of these points explains why Nash would pick a team like Pittsburgh over a team like Vancouver (world class centres, competitive).

      I can imagine that cap is a factor for the Canucks more than the Penguins, but that doesn’t explain why they are not on Nash’s list.

  11. Yes, if he went to Montreal he would definitely play on a line with Scott Gomez… Not Tomas Plekanec or David Desharnais, but Scott Gomez…

  12. All the above criticism aside, it strikes me that the article actually doesn’t address the “real” reasoning for Nash not wanting to come. You provide a plethora of semi-factual information that seems to mostly attack that other guys’ article without concisely backing up the title of the piece.

  13. Hey Ryan … I was going to write a snarky comment about your post, but I see all your commenters have beaten me to it. So … thanks for the link!

  14. All of these wonderfully snarky comments are missing the fact that Lambert is, well, right.

    • I know, who cares if a couple of his examples are bullshit, he’s still right. Nitpickers be hatin.

  15. Pretty nice article, I thought. But I am no Canadian, I suppose.

  16. Lol! Sensitive Canadiens, unite!

  17. The thing is all the Teams he wants to go to have NFL, NCAA, NBA and Baseball team’s that are cared about and covered a hell of a lot more then there NHL teams could even dream about. he would be lost in the mix

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *