There’s a whole world out there, folks. Not just of hockey, but of sport at-large. The majesty of the sporting world cannot be contained to on-field exploits either. The differences between leagues and sports from an organizational perspective can be equal parts staggering and eye popping. It’s safe to say we have yet to figure it all out in North America, and by a long shot at that.

There are lessons we, as hockey enthusiasts, can pluck and pry to figure out how professional hockey can exist on this continent without being shut down every couple of years. Pablo Picasso once said, “Good artists copy, great artists steal.”

I have benevolently stolen from Asia. Brace yourself, for this is my Cubist movement. There’s plenty of room for you to join.

The Indian Premier League has emerged as the top cricket circuit in India. How did it pop into existence? Out of a labor dispute between the Board of Control for Cricket in India and the Indian Cricket League. When the BCCI ordered a boycott of the ICL, it necessitated the creation of a new league. Enter the IPL.

The IPL is novel for a few reasons. First of all, it’s tough to argue with its success. Through five years its value as a league is near the $3 billion mark and this is down from years past. Granted, there is a massive audience for cricket in southern Asia which certainly trumps that for hockey given the whole ‘population’ thing, but clearly the business model is on to something.

If we were to draw a franchise to franchise comparison of the two leagues in terms of franchise value, it’s not close. It’s not an issue, really. The brand value of an NHL team completely and utterly trumps that of an IPL team. Longevity of brands and the North American marketing behemoth does wonders that a five year old cricket league in India never could.

Why have I brought you here? I’m utterly fascinated with the structure of this league.

Once a year the IPL has an open auction for the right to every player in the league. There are caps, of course, on what you can spend on each player — there is an NFL style ‘Franchise Tag’ which caps the biggest auction bid at $5 million on a player, for example. Players who aren’t claimed after the auction are free agents and you’re free to sign them at your own discretion. Each year the league resets and everyone enters the auction pool for next season.

There is no strict trade deadline in our strict sense, but there is a type of ‘trade window’ in the sense of the Footy style transfer market. Players are only allowed to be traded at their own approval.

The IPL got me thinking.

The NHL is broken. There’s no getting around this. Not only have there been three lockouts in the past two decades, but the reality is the league isn’t worth enough to warrant trying to stave off the lockout. You want to know why the NFL didn’t miss a regular season game in 2011? There’s too much money at stake. Mindblowing amounts of money that make the NHL look like your neighbour’s kid’s coin jar to the NFL’s Berkshire Hathaway. If we’re going to do a face value of the NHL situation, it has plateaued. Perhaps it’s time to pull the plug. Perhaps the IPL is the NHL’s reckoning.

Let’s explore the idea of an IPL inspired spin-off league, shall we?

I hereby propose a ten team rebel league — rebel to the Galactic Empire that is the NHL, of course. We’ll come to know the rebels as the good guys — it will be formed prior to the expiration of this NHL lockout.

There will be ten franchises in said league. Locations? Toronto, New York, Montreal, Detroit, Boston, Chicago, Vancouver, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Los Angeles. These are the locations of the ten most valuable franchises in the NHL. I’m sure each one of these towns has an eccentric billionaire who would love to own a hockey team. Indulge them.

Every player in the world will be added to a list. And by every player, I mean every single freaking player. Everyone who has an NHL contract, everyone who has a KHL contract, everyone who has an SM-liiga contract, and so on. Everyone. This list will comprise the auction block. There will be a set auction cap and you will be forced to spend it wisely. Think of it as the ultimate auction fantasy draft. Once your money is gone, it’s gone. You’re done. You’ll need to pick through the leftovers if you can’t fill out a roster.

The auction, of course, will only give you the exclusive rights to negotiate with players. You can pay them their true value or what you can afford rather than what the market will dictate. You want to give Scott Gomez $42 million a year? Go for it. It’s your money. The asylum is at the end of the road, turn left. It will be a one year deal, because the auction has to happen again prior to next season.

Let’s look at the merits of this system, shall we?

First of all, professional hockey in North America to rival the NHL, if not surpass it. NHL contraction in the first place means a deeper talent pool and, by extension, better teams and, by extension, better hockey. Just doing it under a different heading will have the same effect. The league would be made up of ~200 players, thereby ‘trimming the fat’ so to speak. You want to know how no talent goon X still has a job? Problem solved. He doesn’t play in the top rung anymore. A lot of problems have just been solved.

Second, you have effectively made the league lockout proof. By resetting the league each year you prevent the Rick DiPietro contracts of the world, thereby saving the owners from themselves. The players would also have the opportunity to make more money on a yearly basis, given that there would be impetus to pay up for a yearly run which would put yearly performance at a premium. Let’s also not forget that a player veto in the trade window also gives them greater ability to choose where they play, should the issue come up. Happy player = better player.

Third, by limiting the league to financially sustainable markets you ensure the league’s profitability. There are no square pegs in round holes here, just hockey markets with hockey teams. This isn’t a slight on non-traditional markets as some have done quite well for themselves, but it’s a simple dollars and cents issue. As the league progresses there will be opportunities for towns to buy in for a fee, just like the IPL.

While some may argue that competitive balance becomes an issue, I would argue that a cap on the auction, rather than salaries which, as we know, are prone to circumvention, evens the playing field further. In the past five years of IPL play, four teams have won titles. Certain franchises are clearly stronger than others, but the fact is anyone has a chance.

Now, while I’ve essentially had a shotgun wedding with this idea and now plan on staying married to it forever until I die, there are drawbacks.

The lack of brand recognition is a problem. It would obviously be amazing to retain the Leafs, Rangers, Habs, etc., for the sake of the name recognition, but I don’t have the foggiest idea of how a team would go about extracting themselves. Could MLSE buy themselves out of the NHL? I would certainly hope so, as I would hope for all of these locations. A non-Bruins team in Boston would be a bizarre pill to swallow, regardless of your opinion on the franchise.

The lack of long-term deals may also deter some players from wanting to make the leap, but the potential for a big pay day from one year to the next also adds some incentive to play in this league. I’m also banking on the magical rebel league taking enough of a bite out of NHL revenues that salaries would force players from their cushy 12 year deals. Keep in mind that there is no salary cap on contracts, only auction fees. It’s whatever gets negotiated. Sidney Crosby wants $22 million? Sure.

As far as the nuts and bolts of the league, a schedule in the neighborhood of 58 games would do the number of teams in the league justice. A six team, NFL style playoff wherein the first two seeds get byes and teams three through six battle it out in the quarter-final. The Stanley Cup will, of course, be the prize here because this will be flipping awesome hockey.

This may be the equivalent to falling in love with someone who appears in a drug induced hallucination, but damn it all, I’m smitten.

A live auction. Ten teams. The best 200 players in the world. When you woke up this morning you didn’t think someone would tell you that cricket may be the best thing to ever happen to hockey. Here we are. It happened.

Can you get on board with this? I’ll make the phone calls.

Stick tap to theScore’s Andrew McKay for getting my brain working on this. For getting my brain working at all, actually.

Comments (6)

  1. Interesting idea but it will be too hard to work out, and by the time it gets close to fruition the NHL will just say, ok let’s settle and they kill it.

    Some other issues I see

    - redoing the draft each means a lot of potential player movement. Hard to root for a team that could turn over most of the roster each year

    - how do they secure a TV network deal when the threat of it falling apart once the NHL comes back is hanging over their heads?

    - what arena is going to guarantee them dates to play when again, once the NHL reaches a new deal they will take over again?

    I don’t think hockey has enough of a following in the US to create a secondary league like the XFL or USFL. And we already have the 2nd best group of talent in the AHL and those guys will never go on strike so another league will never get enough quality players.

  2. Theres no way players will agree to 1 year stints for the rest of there careers

  3. I do love watching draft picks mature over time, but the yearly auction would be fantastic. Sign me up.

  4. Not totally sure of the logistics involved to make this successful, but I think it’s a really cool and exciting idea.

    It makes me think about the world juniors, there is a pretty consistent roster turnover every year with a small core of players playing one or two times but its desperate and amazing hockey to watch. I can imagine that if players were fighting for a yearly contract and had just as much of a chance to win a cup every year over a smaller schedule then we would be watching some pretty desperate hockey for longer than just the holidays.

    My biggest issue is having a different team in a well established city, it would be weird watching hockey in Montreal without the Habs playing.

    Thanks for the post!

  5. This would be a good idea except that in this case the ICL were the Rebels and the BCCI was The Empire. Also it wasn’t a labour dispute , it was a television rights dispute. The ICL was started by the owners of a TV channel following a dispute regarding the bidding process for the TV rights to the Indian national team . so,the Empire struck back with their own league(till then cricket never had any major leagues ,it was played mostly at the international level).
    The ICL just couldn’t compete with the financial strength of the BCCI (IPL)..So in hockey terms this is sort of similar to the WHA /IHLvs NHL situation.
    Also as a professional sports league the IPL is a joke .

  6. This is nice, except you’re wrong.

    IPL teams are allowed to sign domestic minor league players to multi year contracts. They are also allowed to sign a certain number of players to multi year contracts. They are also allowed franchise cornerstone players. MS Dohni will never play with anyone other than Chennai. Sachin Tendulkar will never play for a team other than Mumbai, unless the ownership groups allow for it.

    Further, for a gate driven league, which the NHL is and the IPL is not, the idea that players can change uniforms every year as you’re proposing is horrendous. Television driven revenue generated products like the IPL can support this, gate driven products like the NHL (and CFL) cannot, as they rely on the local marketing that named players represent.

    Finally, it isn’t all wine and roses for the IPL. Franchises in Hyderabad, Pune and Tochi have gone bankrupt. In the end, even with a “cap” (and I put that in quotes because the Mumbai team I follow has exceeded it on multiple occasions) franchises in less stable markets have difficulty making the numbers work.

    I take issue with the idea that the IPL is a “joke”. It is a very good idea, just one that is run poorly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *