2013 NHL Stanley Cup Final - Game Four

The headline’s a bit dramatic, if only because who the hell knows what happens going forward with injuries and the potential for terrifyingly bad luck, but if everything stays the same as it currently sits, I feel like the Stanley Cup is waiting to be dropped from it’s dunk tank-like perch into Corey Crawford and the Blackhawks’ hands…if he can just throw a couple strikes at the target.

Last night was huge for Chicago. If Boston scores the OT winner they head back to the Windy City with three cracks to beat Chicago once. The Blackhawks would be in full second-guessing themselves mode, having blown multiple leads and having given up six. Quenneville might tinker with the lines, or the lineup as a whole. Crawford is strung up from a sturdy branch. Ray Emery starts answering more questions. The whole thing starts to unravel, because that’s how the reactionary world of sports works.

But winning heals everything, and in the process, the Blackhawks had a barrel full of back-monkeys jump off, which will entirely free their stars up mentally to play the game as they can again. Jonathan Toews starred as The Beast in the Crease and scored for the first time since May, a span of 10 games dating back to the Red Wings’ series. Patrick Kane scored his first goal of the Stanley Cup Final. Patrick Sharp got his second of the Final. Hell, they even scored a powerplay goal.

And further, Marian Hossa made it all the way through the game and now doesn’t have to play again until Saturday, which means he gets an extra day to heal up, and will definitely play in Game 5. Those of you who’ve played through injuries know just how valuable that extra day can be – where the one day off in between contests means you wake up going “Ughhh f*************k, everything hurts,” there’s the potential to feel human with the bonus day in there.

Now they’ve got two of three games in the Madhouse on Madison. Everything would be peachy and perfect if it weren’t for this one large, scary elephant hiding behind the dresser:

The hell is up with all those low-glove goals on Corey Crawford? Is this a thing? Is shooting there like using The Cheat Move in NHL ’94?

2013 NHL Stanley Cup Final - Game Four

I wrote the other day after the last Bruins’ win that Corey Crawford is “legit” (point #10), because he is. He’s done more than enough to prove that to me, so I’m not questioning him in the big picture. His numbers have been stellar in the post-season, which accurately reflects his play.

But this low glove stuff, it just keeps happening…

And happening…

And happening…

And happening…

And happening…

And happening…

And happening…


I mean, you get the picture. A lot of those shots are great plays that you can’t really fault Crawford on, but the sheer volume of pucks that are beating him to the same spot has to be getting into his head.

Most goalies hold their glove above their pad, almost exactly where those shots are going, then react upwards as players shoot for the top corners. You can see it on the (non-OT) Dan Paille goal, where Tyler Seguin gets robbed going glove side prior to his linemate scoring – if you actually get the puck up into the upper corners, he’s making those saves. While I’m no goalie analyst, that says to me that he’s almost too eager, and guessing that the shots are going to be perfectly placed upstairs, rather than waiting to see where they really go.

(By the way, I have doubts that the Bruins have isolated “low” to the glove side, because it’s a relatively uncommon place to try to score, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they’ve targeted what they feel to be Crawford’s weak side.)

Crawford was asked about it after the game (in a jovial tone – winning heals everything and makes everything okay, never forget), and said this about the Bruins repeatedly going glove side on him (at the 30 second mark):


For the video impaired:

“It’s pretty obvious. I can’t start thinking about it; that’s when I get myself in trouble if I start thinking about that. … I’m just going to keep playing my game, prepare the way I have and play the way I play. I can’t start thinking they’re going to go glove every time. If they end up switching it up, then I’m in trouble.”

That’s a nice answer, but the fact that it’s so obvious that we’re discussing it, and he’s aware of it, means he’s aware of it. I still haven’t become a goalie analyst since I said I wasn’t a couple paragraphs ago, but I feel like it’s probably a bit of a mental hindrance to go from positional and reactionary to positional and reactionary and DON’T THINK GLOVE DON’T CHEAT GLOVE DON’T THINK GLOVE.

For all the digital fellatio Boston has been deservedly given over the past handful of days, Chicago suddenly finds themselves in a beautiful position for all the reasons I pointed out earlier in the article. No team is at 100% right now, but that OT goal by Seabrook has them positioned as well as they could hope heading into Game 5.

The biggest question mark for them right now is in the crease. With the roulette wheel stopping on black, black, black, black, black, black and so on, is Crawford mentally strong enough to avoid sliding his chips to that side, or will all this glove attention start to make him cheat? He dodged a bullet with a Blackhawks’ win last night, but has to know some focus is starting to shift his way.

If he can throw a couple strikes in the next few games, I like the Blackhawks to win the Cup.

The biggest concern for them right now is whether or not another wild pitch or two is coming.

Comments (36)

  1. I think the more consistent thing in those goals, other than happening to be shot on 1 of 2 sides of a human beings body… is that they’re all the result of bad turnovers or nice passing plays that end up w/ a guy getting to unleash a wide open bomb from the slot, often one-timers. Guys getting to unleash bombs from the slot is not fun for the goaltender.

    Is Crawford weaker glove-side than blocker-side? Yeah, probably. But its not like he’s Jim Abbott out there or anything.

    • nice Jim Abbott reference, lol. incidentally, I met the guy as a kid; class act all the way. signed some cards for me, stayed after his speech to chat with my then 10 year old self, solid dude.

  2. Thank-you for calling it “low glove”, all the pundits are calling it high-glove and it’s not.

  3. Weak Weak, gloveeeehand!

  4. It looks kind of like Crawford’s initial reaction is to move the glove up, to try to take away the high shot and then snatch down at low shots instead of keeping the glove above the pad and moving up to try to stop high shots. Don’t know why this would be, maybe he had a weak glove when he was younger and developed the move to compensate, but you can see in the videos, his glove is repeatedly starting high and moving down towards the low shots instead of starting low and moving up towards the high shots.

    • Someone mentioned somewhere (I think on NHL on the Fly last night) that he watched a lot of Lundqvist’s positioning and adopted the high-glove style.

      Why anyone would try to adopt Lundqvist’s horrible glove ability though is beyond me.

  5. It should be easier and quicker to move something from higher to lower than vice versa. I’s called ‘gravity’ and it’s not just a good idea, it’s the law.

  6. As a goaltender I will clarify the difference between a glove starting low and starting high. When you leave the glove high, it is much less effort and more quick to drop the glove due to gravity but a goalie may not be used to this ease/quickness and will choose to start low. Also starting low makes it look like a much more difficult save because more movement is involved in making it (Goalies who like to display finesse). It really just comes down to personal preference but scientifically your glove can be faster when you start at a high point.

  7. I’m not sure it’s even a “low glove” issue as much as it is a positioning issue. On at least 2 of the Boston goals last night, Crawford was out of position to the point that the left side seemed like a much bigger target. When I see that much room to one side of the goalie, I shoot there (and unlike the Boston players, I generally miss wide right of the post).

  8. I’m not a goaltender but a defenseman, so take this with a grain of salt, but Crawford seems to be playing a bit too-far back in the net. He’s a guy who relies on good fundamentals of positioning to make saves, and these glove side shots that are beating say that he isn’t completely square and that he is probably too far back in the net – at least on some plays. This season, one of Crawford’s most admirable traits has been his ability bounce back after a soft goal or two, and stand tall in net.

    In fairness to C.C., two of the ones that got by him last night were flukes. Saad fell down on the one play, when he seemed positioned to clear, and then there was that weird bounce off the glass that went right to Patrice Bergeron. There aren’t too many goalies in the world – including Rask – who are going to stop Bergeron from that distance and in that circumstance.

    The bet here is that Crawford comes out strong in game five. His d-men and forwards have played a solid defensive game in front of him all year. A net-minder is only as good as the defense in front of him. The Hawks “d” needs to clamp down and play their game. If they do, the ‘Hawks should be fine.

    Corey, just remember that although they got five past you, the guy at the other end of the ice let in six. They don’t care how, just how many.

  9. Most goalies don’t keep their gloves low and move it up to stop the shots in the corners. Most goalies actually keep their gloves pretty high to take away high shots and move their gloves down in order to take away the shot above the pads. If you watch most NHL goalies there is a lot more arm movement on a low shot than there is a high shot. The reason for this is because it is a lot easier and you can move your glove a lot quicker down than you can up (gravity, weight of glove, etc.).

    Crawford isn’t getting beat because of his glovehand positioning, he’s getting beat because he’s either guessing or just dropping straight down and trying to stab the puck out of the air. On all those shots you see him either lean to his right then stretch out to try and stop the shot that is actually going left or just drop straight down and wave at the puck. The same thing, but opposite side, happened to Raask on the Seabrook goal. Crawford isn’t moving into the shot, he’s moving away from it then trying to reach at it with his glove which is just terrible fundamentally.

  10. These goals are more about Crawford losing track of the puck/play. They look like he has no clue the shots are coming in most.

  11. So beautiful! I like the earthy & classic tones of your wedding! I’m so stealing the succulent idea. Wonderful bride, handsome hubby & bridal party. Awesome photographs as normally Tammy!

  12. Right on the bell. Thanks.

  13. I’m gone to inform my little brother, that he should also pay a quick visit this weblog on regular basis to take updated from latest news.

  14. Prom dresses mention rather a lot concerning their users. 100s of young females time and time again find prom dresses, and a lot of these prefer free from danger answers which are very similar to the perception of everyone else. Are brave enough to end up being different and level away from the time-honored prom dresses and opt for more vivid, more original varieties.

  15. Hi! Quick question that’s entirely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My blog looks weird when browsing from my iphone4. I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to resolve this issue. If you have any suggestions, please share. Cheers!

  16. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.

  17. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this superb blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this website with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

  18. Calculate how many days are left for your next birthday

  19. Hi, just wanted to tell you, I loved this blog post. It was inspiring. Keep on posting!

  20. Great posting. Now i’m watching for far more. You will be this kind of excellent writer.

  21. Tammy this a wonderful blog submit! It is so great when folks appreciate all that you do.

  22. Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Thank you so much, However I am having troubles with your RSS. I don’t understand the reason why I am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting similar RSS issues? Anybody who knows the answer will you kindly respond? Thanx!!

  23. Only wanna comment on few general things, The website design and style is perfect, the subject material is rattling great. “The idea of God is the sole wrong for which I cannot forgive mankind.” by Marquis de Sade.

  24. You’ve made some decent points there. I looked on the net to learn more about the issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this website.

  25. Your style is unique in comparison to other people I’ve read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark this web site.

  26. Right here is the perfect blog for anybody who would like to understand this topic. You realize a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you (not that I really would want to…HaHa). You certainly put a new spin on a topic that’s been written about for ages. Wonderful stuff, just excellent!

  27. Are you able to add a Blackberry template? This page is difficult to read otherwise for those of us browsing with cell phones. Otherwise, in the event you can put a RSS link up, that will be terrific also.

  28. I as well as my guys came digesting the superb suggestions and tricks found on the web site then rapidly I got a terrible feeling I in no way thanked the weblog owner for all those tactics. A lot of the ladies are truly completely thrilled to read through them and have now sincerely been loving those factors. Thanks for getting really considerate and for choosing varieties of marvelous topic matter most people are actually eager to uncover. My pretty personal sincere apologies for not expressing gratitude to you sooner.

  29. Thank you, I’ve recently been hunting for details about this subject for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far.

  30. I have been exploring for a little bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts on this sort of house . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this web site. Studying this info So i’m glad to express that I’ve a very excellent uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed. I so much indisputably will make certain to do not overlook this website and give it a glance regularly.

  31. This is a topic that is close to my heart… Many thanks! Exactly where are your contact details though?

  32. Wow that was strange. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but immediately after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… properly I’m not writing all that more than once again. Anyways, just wanted to say wonderful weblog!

  33. This is such a great idea. A friend of mine sent me your website link. It’s such a superior way to engage readers offline and get physical mail which everyone loves. I may should do this after my blog is up and running a bit more.

  34. Thanks for finally talking about > %blog_title% < Loved it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *