Isn’t this what the Leafs wanted?

Phil Kessel tough

Exactly what, apart from what he ended up doing, was Phil Kessel supposed to do in that situation? The whole world is having a good ol’ laugh at Kessel this week after he took a two-hander at John Scott’s ankle. Kessel’s options at the time were threefold:

  1. Fight John Scott and have the Christ beaten out of him.
  2. Skate away from Scott as fast as possible and bear the brunt of the next several decades of laughs that would come his way.
  3. Try to keep Scott away from him long enough for someone to intercede on his behalf, perhaps by wielding his stick like a hatchet.

He obviously chose the third and final of these choices and it proved the most judicious. The time on the IR with a concussion that came with No. 1 was always a non-starter, and the scorn from No. 2 likewise was never an option. And now hockey pundits in every major market, most of all those with reason to dislike Kessel (Boston) or the Leafs (Montreal), laughs at Kessel. The Toronto media, for their part, defended their boy and team as well they should have: The kinds of tactics the Sabres employed in that game, following Corey Tropp asking Jamie Devane to fight following a goal. Devane, an aspiring NHLer with naught but 36 pro games (and 90 PIM in them) to his credit obliged. By KOing Tropp. And, in doing so, allowing the player five inches shorter and 40ish pounds slighter than himself to bounce his head scarily off the ice.

In turn, Sabres coach Ron Rolston put out John Scott and an assortment of other non-skill players. Randy Carlyle, given that he had last change a total lack of things happening in his brain, put out his top line, which included Kessel. Thus began the chaos of a line brawl, David Clarkson leaving the bench, and a goalie fight.

But let’s not forget where all this started: It started when the Leafs themselves started loading up on brainless goons, as a means of becoming “harder to play against.” That the Leafs had none of them (save for Devane) in the lineup mattered not at all; if you’re playing Toronto, you prepare as though you’re going to have to fist-fight some people. Thus the inclusion of Scott in the lineup.

Is this not what the Leafs asked for? Is this not the kind of hockey they’ve implicitly condoned through their roster construction in the last few years? Is what the Sabres did to them on Sunday really so much different from when they danced in the streets and laughed themselves silly over when they played Montreal in early February, and guys like Colton Orr and Frazer McLaren, with the combined hockey skill of a small child, whaled on Brian Gionta and Josh Gorges? It’s not unlike the National Rifle Association’s ideas about how to prevent mass shootings, but leaving aside good and bad, for every “guy with a gun” on the Leafs roster, there’s someone with one on the Sabres’. The lines of who’s good and who’s bad depends entirely on which bench you happen to be sitting on, and if you’re not on a bench at all, the only bad guys are the ones whose jobs are solely to punch people repeatedly.

It’s not so funny when some brainless thug tries to pummel your own team’s best player into a gooey red puddle, but I guess that’s not a moral anyone outside Toronto this week really needs to be told.

But do you know what’s really funny about all this? The team responsible wasn’t even in the building. The Sabres beefing up was of course a result of the time Milan Lucic ran through Ryan Miller at a thousand miles an hour and concussed him except not really, and no one on the Sabres made a big deal out of it during the game, let alone trying to punch him; this only served to encourage Buffalo, and to a lesser extent the Leafs, to go shopping for toughness and make it a bigger part of the gameplan. Montreal tried to do the same thing, as did Ottawa. This is the kind of incident you didn’t even need a telescope to see coming: Skill guy gets knocked out by thug. Knocked-out guy’s thug teammate goes after thug’s skill teammate. The whole thing devolves, the Leafs definitely lose their prized free agent signing for one-eighth of the season, and the incident leads to lots of tongue-clucking from people in all corners of the sport about What It All Means.

What it all means, of course, is that if neither team felt the need to carry players like this because hey look they don’t actually deter anyone from anything at all ever none of this would have happened and the Leafs would have simply beaten the hell out of Buffalo in a preseason game no one even thought about again. It’s a little early in the season to be having existential crises about the sport because of something John Scott did. Or at least, I would have thought so.

Comments (16)

  1. The problem with the Leafs and the Sabres trying to beef up to challenge the Bruins is that they forgot one very important thing: Those beefy guys should be able to PLAY HOCKEY. The Bruins do not have goons wasting roster spots. They have tough guys who can play.

    As for Kessel, I have little problem with the first slash. I have a major problem with the second; it was unnecessary. And his attempted spear was just silly/childish/pathetic. And for the record, I can’t stand Scott.

    As a Bruins fan, I have to admit I find this all highly amusing.

  2. I have never seen John Scott try to “jump” anyone. It seems very likely to me that he was just trying to rattle Kessel and succeeded beyond his wildest dreams.

  3. Here’s the problem when you have those skilled guys like Lucic who take runs at your teams star players….like Miller, Kessel, Crosby, or whoever. If you don’t have someone on your team to discourage that (i.e Orr, Scott, Parros) then that leave the Lucic’s of the world to keep running after your skilled players. Unfortunatly there arn’t to many skilled tough guys in the NHL so that why teams pay to have an enforcer and have him only play 5 minutes a night.

    • Other than running into Miller, when has Lucic taken “runs at your teams star players”?

      • Captain Trix didn’t say that. That’s a terrible quote to use for your argument. Cpt. Trix said, “…skilled guys like Lucic who take runs…” Whether you agree or disagree with the meaning of the post, the statement was in respect of players similar to Lucic; not necessarily Lucic himself.

        • OK, here’s the full quote:

          “Here’s the problem when you have those skilled guys like Lucic who take runs at your teams star players….like Miller, Kessel, Crosby, or whoever.”

          So I’ll ask again, when has Lucic taken runs at Kessel, Crosby or whoever? Unless “take runs” means “hit hard,” which last I knew, was perfectly legal, if not expected, especially from a power forward.

  4. I don’t think most if anyone had a problem with the first slash. But coming back around when two or three guys are already on top of Scott can no longer, in any fashion, be considered out of defense. He used his stick as a weapon, on a player who was defenseless to it, with possible intent to injure. He has to be suspended; we cannot have people bringing their sticks in to fist fights.

    • this is so true. guys can’t just go around spearing people and swinging their sticks like that, but by all means NHL, let’s penalize jersey tucking instead.

    • All true. I’m willing to accept the fact guys apparently don’t need to protect themselves by skating with their heads up, but if this kind of stick BS is allowed we are on a bad path here.

  5. Goons are crucial to success in the NHL. Why look at the roster of the Chicago Blackhawks. Brandon Bollig maybe.

  6. Everyone is saying that the leafs’ problem is that they don’t have skilled tough guys, but the actual issue is that they DO have one of the most skilled tough guys in the league, but he will be sitting in the press box for the next month (i.e. David Clarkson). However, this is the way the leafs will win games; if they play a style of hockey that is annoying for the other team to play against, and boosts morale, unity and competitiveness amongst the players.

  7. This is a really poor analysis. There are factors that make this different from last year’s Leafs game against the Habs.

    First off, this was a pre-season game. There’s nothing at stake, no pride on the line for someone like John Scott to come out and defend after his teammate lost the fight he picked. Especially not by going after a first line player and a guy who doesn’t fight. In the regular season, I could see your argument, but not in a preseason game.

    And this takes me to the point about Orr and MacLaren going after Gionta and Gorges. I remember the incident you’re talking about, and what happened was that Orr had his stick taken from his hand (by a much smaller guy) and thrown away, which is a pretty clear indication that Montreal was starting trouble. As a result, he ran Plekanec and grabbed Gionta (and didn’t pummel him as Scott certainly would have Kessel) and hit Bourque when Bourque got involved. In the instance of MacLaren and Gorges, Gorges started the fight with MacLaren, and if you go back and watch, it’s pretty clear that MacLaren held back against Gorges. If you want to accuse MacLaren of anything, it’s attempting to humiliate Gorges.

    Simply put, these matters are not analogous and have about as much in common as this fight and Mike Milbury beating a fan with a shoe. You might have a point about the Leafs inviting this type of violence on its first line if this were the regular season, but not the preseason. And your comparison is very far off the mark.

  8. Howdy! Quick question that’s entirely off topic.
    Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly?
    My site looks weird when viewing from my iphone 4. I’m trying to find
    a theme or plugin that might be able to correct this problem.
    If you have any recommendations, please share.

  9. Your style is so unique in comparison to other folks I’ve read stuff from.
    Thank you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I’ll
    just bookmark this site.

  10. Do ones verify; get the ducks in a very short period, as
    well as be ready to indication around the speckled collection when you
    finally discover the precise residence. To do that, these professionals look at fundamental features of
    the home, like its structure and overall condition,
    rather than the less vital factors, like the color of the paint or carpeting on the floors.
    The epoxy covering will stand against spots from engine oil and grime, and spills will remove up easily.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *