steven stamkos 2

It’s very rare indeed that a team goes worst-to-first in modern sports. People made a massive deal in the past week of the Red Sox having done so, obviously, but the difference there is that the Red Sox having finished last was the anomaly for many reasons, not the least of which was the amount of money spent on fielding a last-place team.

In the NHL, it’s even rarer; most teams go worst-to-kind-of-okay-to-good-to-first with a lot of noticeable incremental changes along the way. Getting a new coach, getting a new GM, grabbing some high draft picks, waiting a little while, making notable free agent signings, then finally being good or even great. It’s a process, and it usually goes in more or less that order.

Teams that are very good usually don’t stay that way for long periods of time, unless they’re the Red Wings. Even the very best teams in the league have “windows” in which they will be able to legitimately compete for the Stanley Cup, with the Washington Capitals and San Jose Sharks in recent years being noted as the kind of team for whom the window is closing.

One team that falls well outside the norm for this kind of thing is currently sitting atop the Flortheast Division, and they are a team that no one expected to finish anywhere near a playoff spot. In fact, that division alone was expected to send Boston (meh), Montreal (meh), Ottawa (ugh), and Detroit (sure) to the playoffs at the very least, with a little wiggle room for the Leafs to sneak in if they kept getting the bounces that served them so well last season (they have so far). Tampa never entered the equation.

And yet there they are, second in the Eastern Conference with 20 points from their first 14 games, on pace to rack up 117 points over the 82-game season. They of course will not do that, because pretty much no one gets 117 points. Since the second Bettman lockout, only four teams have done it (and the Blackhawks were obviously on pace to do so; in fact, they were on pace for 132), and all of them won the Presidents’ Trophy.

The Tampa Bay Lightning are not going to win the Presidents’ Trophy, but there is some question at this point as to whether the thing they’ve done so far have been little more than smoke and mirrors and, perhaps more accurately, luck. You watch a Bolts game here and there and nothing, really, pops out at you to explain why the team is where it is in the division its in. They score a decent-enough amount of goals per game (seventh in the league at 3.21), then don’t allow a huge amount (10th at 2.5), their power play is good (10th at 21.4 percent), their penalty kill is too (seventh at 85.4 percent). That’s nothing but top-10s in the major statistical categories, and so you say to yourself, well, they’ve earned it.

It’s early yet, and a lot of teams are just now starting to round into form after shaky starts, while others that started hot despite their quality are already sinking into the league’s lower depths. Tampa, though, remains buoyant behind those strong stats, but it’s tough to say how long those hold up. For one thing, the team is on the losing end of the shot attempts battle most nights, with just 48.6 percent of all such events at even strength for the whole of their 14 games. With the score close, the number slips to 48.5 percent, though it grows to 50.5 percent with the score tied. They are, however, currently shooting 9.6 percent as a team, compared with their opponents’ 8.5 percent, and that says that the good things will probably come to an end in some way relatively soon.

(All those other teams that are off to improbably good starts this year, by the way? They’re in much the same boat Anaheim, Colorado, Toronto, Phoenix and Tampa are first, second, fourth, eighth and 10th in the league in PDO, respectively, which doesn’t exactly speak to their abilities to sustain things at the rate they’ve been going. Colorado’s probably the most egregious of these, just 0.1 points off the No.1 PDOers in Anaheim, albeit against some of the stiffer competition in the league. Their strength of schedule is 11th to Anaheim’s 22nd. One suspects that probably none of these teams are actually all that “for real.”)

But how much of it, then, is the team itself, rather than the teams they’re playing. Obviously Steven Stamkos and Martin St. Louis could — and do — score against everyone all the time. But look at their other big contributors: Val Filppula, the big free agent signing this summer, looks like a great pickup behind his 5-6-11 in 14 games, but that’s help, a little bit, by the fact that he’s shooting 31.3 percent. Alex Killorn is, in his second full season, much more likely a product of the people he plays with (the aforementioned Messrs. Stamkos and St. Louis) than Teddy Purcell, who’s shooting the puck more and keeping his shooting percentage manageable (14.3 percent).

Of course, the big reason being cited by people these days is Ben Bishop, he of the .925 save percentage in 11 games this season. Is this why the Bolts went out and got him? After all, this is the best save percentage of his career, which has been getting better in the past few seasons despite the repeated changes of scenery. But what’s interesting is that his current even-strength save percentage (.927) isn’t that much better than the one he’s dealing with in all situations.

One has to think that his luck on the PK, on which he’s stopped 93.1 percent of all the shots he’s faced, runs out at some point in the very near future; in fact, only three goalies in the league have even faced as many shots when their team is down a man, and those dudes haven’t fared nearly as well. Mike Smith (.894), Ryan Miller (.919), and Jonathan Quick (.833) are all miles behind Bishop’s .931.

So that, really, is what Tampa’s success boils down to: Ben Bishop has been unconscious on the PK, which has led to the team killing 85 percent of all penalties when he’s in the game (34 of 40). Funnily, Colorado is in an even better, if more noticeably-leaking boat, successfully killing 90.9 percent of their PKs so far this season.

Bishop is at some point going to stop looking like Ken Dryden when his team’s down a man, and also at some point, Tampa’s power play is probably going to stop having the third-highest shooting percentage in the league (17.1 percent, behind only St. Louis’ 23.1 and Montreal’s 17.7 percent).

Turns out that Tampa’s even-strength goal differential of plus-3 (tied for 11th with Toronto and Detroit) probably won’t be enough to keep it afloat when its special teams inevitably hit a wall. And that’s why, come April, we probably won’t think of Tampa as being all that special at all.

Comments (14)

  1. Could this success also be associated with an impressive pro-level prospect group graduating to the NHL?

    There were guys like Tyler Johnson and Radko Gudas who picked up some valuable experience down the stretch last year. Couple that with some other graduating prospects who stood out at the AHL level: Ondrej Palat, Alex Killorn, Brett Connoly, Richard Panik, and this could be a very solid group going forward.

    Chances are some of these guys won’t pan out in the NHL, but they have no shortage of PPG AHLers to experiment with.

  2. With that start in the East TB is a legit playoff contender. When you put 20 points in the bank and you have 68 games to still play it’s pretty simple math. They would have to get really, really bad to drop below the 90 point mark by seasons end. In a nutshell, they (like Colorado) they’ve set the table to be right in the mix of a playoff hunt even if they regress heavily. I think the question with TB (even more so than Colorado) is why were they so bad previously? The talent is there.

  3. The Oilers did go from worst to first this season. If the frickin Canucks hadn’t jumped Hall and Gagner, you would know it already. Just wait until we’re healthy, Eakins and Ference are going to whip a winning attitude into the team and that diving bunch of sissies (Damien Cox’s words, not mine) are going to be running scared

  4. This is pretty much what I’ve been saying all along. Bishop’s better but not as good as his numbers show. Shooting %’s too high, and they aren’t generating enough shots, though they’ve made huge strides defensively vs last season.

    But on the other hand, most of the Tampa fans around me don’t expect this to continue or think the Bolts are a number one team. They just want to know there’s progress being made and if that ends up with a wild card berth, that’s just a bonus this year. I expect there are Lightning fans who think this is proof that Jon Cooper is a wizard or something,

  5. Two reason in my opinion:
    1) They are beating teams they should (4-0 vrs. BUF/FLA)
    2) Stamkos and St. Louis came to play when it mattered with 8 and 7 points respectively in their three biggest wins so far. (CHI, LA, CHI).

  6. More teams visit Florida and take the ‘day’ off to enjoy being millionaires.

    Get get drunk fishing and stuff and show up at the game with a vacation mindset.

    TB is 6-2 at home.

  7. I have to agree with Dario’s earlier comment, why weren’t we better? When we look at last season, we were the only non play off team with a positive +/-. Our offense was scoring. But we had Lindback as the primary starting goalie with no solid back up to him. Defense was in need of work and Guy Boucher couldn’t make the adjustments. In his final post game interviews he would continually say he didn’t know where the breakdown was. Then you look at this year, a new coach who had a crazy win record in AHL, who is constantly making adjustments that work. Ben Bishop, who last year carried Ottawa to the play offs. And a slew of new young players. The article made mention of the Red Sox making it because of the amount of change to their rooster, but in the same way Tampa did the same thing. They just did it with a lot of unknown names and untested talent in a division no one payed attention too. I’m not saying this is a dynasty team but it is one to watch and see how the season develops. That is what Hockey teams are supposed to be like. Not some big Name trades and fill in the rest and pray like hell you make it. I could be wrong but I think they are worth a closer look over the next two weeks, in my opinion, is the hardest part of their schedule.

    • Ben Bishop never “carried Ottawa to the playoffs.” He played 10 games for them in 11-12 and 13 in 12-13. He was a call up goalie for them.

      • Ok, carried is a stretch. 13 games may not be a lot but that was a quarter of the season that year. So he was a contributing factor to their success that season.

  8. One thing I find interesting to look at is the schedule, and how that impacts teams. Tampa is 5-0 against Western conference teams, 5-4 against Eastern teams. Small sample sizes, but since there’s going to play a lot more against East teams, and they seem ‘worse’ against them, perhaps that will have an impact?
    Montreal, for example, is 3-1 vs Eastern teams, and 5-6-1 vs Western teams. If I remember the schedule correctly, that means Montreal has played 12 of their 28 games vs Western conference teams already, but only 4 of 54 vs Eastern teams. (Only Edmonton has a similar distribution, but theirs is kind of worse, having only played 4 games against the better Western conference, and yet they’re still awful)

    Ultimately, I think it’s still too early to say much for sure, though we can always find interesting little things that don’t mean anything (like what I’ve written above!)

  9. Thank you a lot for sharing this with all of us you really
    realize what you’re speaking approximately! Bookmarked.

    Kindly also talk over with my web site =).
    We will have a hyperlink exchange contract between us

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *