“Thoughts on Thoughts” is a feature that looks at Elliotte Friedman’s terrific weekly post “30 Thoughts.” Justin Bourne selects his 10 favourite tidbits, and elaborates.
Last edition: P.K. Subban eyes bigger payday (from a few weeks ago, apologies on the gap)
Friedman’s column, February 19th: Hockey socks and safety
Opening:
In this week’s opening, Elliotte Friedman makes the completely rational argument that team owners should be allowed to dictate some mandatory measures in terms of the safety of their equipment. It wouldn’t be that hard to require players to wear cut-proof socks or safer goalie masks (there is no world where a guy would claim “I’d have been an NHLer had it not been for those darn cut-preventing socks“). If the arguments for safety don’t appeal to the players, he makes another awfully good point: more injuries means more players getting NHL paychecks which means higher escrow which means guys make less money. Players shouldn’t just want to keep themselves safe, they should want their brethren to be doing the same, as it has financial benefits.
The PA has fought the NHL to keep their freedom of choice when it comes to gear. But as @67sound said on Twitter….
Reading those pieces by @friedgehnic and @adanielwagner I always wonder why workplace safety legislation applies to every industry but sport
— 67Sound (@67sound) February 19, 2013
Well, I think @67sound is missing the point that… the um, point that… hmm. Good point, actually.
On to the thoughts. Read the rest of this entry »






