Archive for the ‘Analysis’ Category

169789708

One thing that’s surprised me about the way that the Boston Bruins have been matching up this post-season is that Patrice Bergeron is getting a lot more time matched up against a single top opponent.

That wasn’t the case last year. Bergeron spent very little time matched up against Alexander Ovechkin during the Bruins’ playoff series last season against the Washington Capitals. During the first couple of games of the series, he saw lots of time matched up, but drew away from the match as the series shifted to Washington. Back in Boston for Games 5 and 7, still even less time spent against the Capitals’ most dangerous forward.

My sense this season is that while Zdeno Chara handles the ‘mano-a-mano’ minutes, Claude Julien is less scrupulous with the way he hands out his offensive minutes. Generally, Bergeron will get a lot of defensive zone faceoffs (he had just a 42.4% offensive zone start rate, 4th lowest among centremen with at least 14 minutes of time on ice per game) which will naturally line him up against top offensive players, but it isn’t a necessity.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bet I can tell you who will win this puck battle (Getty)

Bet I can tell you who will win this puck battle (Getty)

The Los Angeles Kings have won six playoff rounds in the last two seasons mostly because of their crazy-hot goaltender, but partly because of a generally un-heralded top line winger—Justin Williams.

Now, there’s no way to know that if Williams hadn’t scored twice in Game 7, or if he never existed, that another King wouldn’t have. One goal drastically changes the balance of strategies in any game, never mind a low-scoring one, so it’s not fair to say that if Williams had been replaced with a stock first line winger, the Kings wouldn’t have won that game against San Jose.

But they did, and Williams fits into an odd category of player. He is good at everything, yet appears to be dynamite at two things: puck possession, and scoring in Game 7s.

Read the rest of this entry »

Chicago Blackhawks v Detroit Red Wings - Game Three

We’re one game away from another season of the Presidents’ Trophy winner not winning the Stanley Cup, which is going to perpetuate the narrative that certain teams are good in the regular season and not in the playoffs. Because the… sixth seed does so much better than the first seed in the postseason.

Or doesn’t.

Living in Vancouver, I frequently get into arguments, both online and in person, with people who do believe that the playoffs reveal a team’s flaws. If that is true, it’s because against quality opponents a team is more likely to break or have weaknesses hammered. The Toronto Maple Leafs ate up the weak Boston Bruins’ defensive depth. The San Jose Sharks shut down the one line of the Vancouver Canucks and let the rest of the pieces fall into play. All teams have weaknesses, and all teams have strengths, and not always will one team’s strengths match up so perfectly against another’s weakness.

Read the rest of this entry »

New York Rangers v Boston Bruins - Game One

The Bruins overtime winner last night was a beauty of a goal, but it left me scratching my head a bit. The play on the offensive side of the puck was obviously great, but how do you end up in situation where Patrice Bergeron, Brad Marchand and Jaromir Jagr have a 2-on-1/3-on-2 on Anton Stralman and Mats Zuccarello?

Well, I came up with five reasons. Well, four true reasons and one “that could have been done better.”

In the interest of not clipping 23453452 screenshots, I’m going to highlight those.

Here’s the goal: Read the rest of this entry »

Perfect Patrice

Toronto Maple Leafs v Boston Bruins - Game Seven

It takes a lot more than goal scoring to win a hockey game. Well, that’s not entirely correct, but it takes a lot more than finishing ability to win a hockey game, and the only stats that appear in a boxscore that are to be trusted are goals and assists.

Patrice Bergeron is good at those things, but he’s also good at all the other things that aren’t recorded in the traditional boxscore, the things you could, until about six years ago, only really see with your eyes. Patience in the neutral zone and impatience in the defensive zone, Bergeron doesn’t like to play too many seconds on the ice without the puck on his stick, and that’s a damn good thing, because there aren’t many players better in the game with the puck on their stick.

Read the rest of this entry »

168631098

By one measure, Tyler Seguin has been the most dangerous player all series for either team.

It comes as little consolation to the young star however. The Toronto Maple Leafs have converted on a much higher number of chances than the Boston Bruins, and the Leafs’ most dangerous player—Phil Kessel—has found the back of the net three times already in the series.

I’ve long thought that a playoff series, or even a playoff run, should not change your opinion of a player. If you thought that Seguin was a player coming into the series, you should probably still think that Seguin is a player, regardless of his results from the first six games.

For those catching up (and if you’re reading hockey blogs, I presume you’re past that stage) the Maple Leafs, heavy underdogs against the Bruins in the first round, have come back from a 3-1 deficit to tie the series 3-3 after 2-1 wins in Games 5 and 6. Game 7 on a quick turnaround runs tonight, and it seems as if there are lots of people prepared to bury the Bruins.

Read the rest of this entry »

168101908

The Canadian Press called it a “surprising split“. The New York Times called the win “surprising“. Scott Burnside suggested that it was because “hard work sometimes trumps talent“.

Perhaps it is the hard work, but there is still a lot of talent on the Islanders roster. Their top six has four first-round picks. They have another first rounder on their third line centred by a player who has been an AHL scoring machine since 2006. There is a lot of skill, even if they aren’t all house-hold names. A couple more performances like they had in Game 2 or 3 of their series though, and maybe a few analysts will begin to credit the Islanders for being a real good hockey team. It’s not just a playoff thing—they’ve been good for a while.

Other than an ill-timed penalty against a deadly Penguins powerplay, the Islanders have out-played the Pens in this series. They out-shot Pittsburgh 31-20 at even strength in the third game and appeared to beat them in scoring chances. In three games, they have out-shot the Penguins 86-61 at even strength.

This shouldn’t have been surprising going in. The Islanders this season were 11th in Hockey Analysis’ Corsi Tied in the NHL and 11th in Behind the Net’s Fenwick Close. Pittsburgh in the same measures were 17th and 15th. The Islanders do have a significant five-on-five advantage that could have been easily picked up on coming in. Read the rest of this entry »