
It's not Stanley, but that doesn't make it meaningless.
The hardest thing about the lockout is the lack of options.
Since September, NHL fans have been screaming for an option, but we don’t have one. We have other hockey we can watch, but the constellation of forces the NHL controls- in this case, not just the elite level of play, the famous franchises, and the Stanley Cup, but also its web of television rights and luxurious arenas- cannot be replicated by any other league. This, objectively, sucks, and fans aren’t shy about saying so. We bitch and moan and whine and fret and lament to the heavens how tragic it is that our hearts should be beholden to this imploding League. We hate that we’ll have to come back after this lockout just like we did after the last, but it’s not just the fans that the NHL is counting on. It’s also the players, vast numbers of whom will come back as well. Like the spectators, most players have no other choice they can imagine exercising. Like us, their only option is to wait, and hope.
But there are a fortunate few who seem to think they have an alternate option. In recent weeks, as the lockout rhetoric has amped up, some Russian players have given interviews suggesting that, in their minds, the NHL is not necessarily the end all and be all of hockey. Ilya Bryzgalov commented, quite practically, that the money to be made in the KHL was good and that there’s something nice about playing in your own country. Kovalchuk and Ovechkin stated that, if there was a significant cut in their salaries under the new CBA, they would consider staying in Russia. And most recently, Sergei Kostitsyn expressed a certain lack of enthusiasm for North American life, and said that as far as he was concerned, a long lockout wouldn’t be such a terrible fate.
Read the rest of this entry »