No matter how you slice it, 2011-12 was a successful season for the Los Angeles Clippers. They had their second winning season in 19 years, won their second playoff series in the same time frame and were gifted one of the best point guards ever thanks to the NBA rescinding a trade that had already been completed. Solid season all around.

However, the Clippers still finished 12 wins from an NBA title, which isn’t all that close. But according to Chris Paul, those 12 wins would have come from one player, who just so happens to have played for the Clippers last season and might do so again next year. From the Denver Post:

“I tell people all the time had Chauncey not got injured we was going to win the championship,” Paul said.

To be fair, the Clippers did win 70 percent of the 20 games Chauncey Billups played before tearing his Achilles. And according to 82games, the Clippers were 4.5 points per 100 possessions better when Billups were on the court. And the Clippers did beat the Thunder and Heat with Chauncers in the lineup (they still lost to the Spurs though, so I don’t know how that figures in to things since the Clips were swept by San Antonio but whatever this is a hypothetical situation so don’t go crazy thinking about this too hard because it’s not that serious). So I guess I can see Chris Paul’s argument.

On the other hand, haha no. The Clippers weren’t one 35-year-old shooting guard who should be a point guard away from winning the NBA championship. I don’t know if you remember this, but the Clippers definitely played Reggie Evans and Caron Butler a lot of minutes in the playoffs, despite the fact their combined playoff PER was 17.7, which is barely above average for a single player. Also not to mention, they played Randy Foye significant minutes, and while Chauncey Billups would certainly eliminate that, it would also bump Nick Young down the rotation and he’s one of the few Clippers who raised their game in the postseason.

No offense to Chris Paul or Chauncey Billups — lots of offense to Randy Foye — but I don’t think adding Chauncey Billups even changes the result of the Western Conference semifinals. Maybe the Clippers don’t get swept, but I’m pretty sure Chauncey only swings one, maybe two, games. I know Chris Paul is an optimist, but he also doesn’t have a time machine and seems to be forgetting who coaches the Clippers. Barring those two things changing, Chauncey Billups isn’t the answer.

(via I Am a GM)

Comments (10)

  1. Little do they know if they had Billups they are still one good coach away from a Championship

  2. The clippers got destroyed by the spurs, which got savaged by the thunder, which got shattered by the heat, and CP3 thought Chauncey would’ve changed anything? The 04 Pistons coulda came off the bench for the ’12 clippers and the spurs woulda beat them in a more closely contested 4 games, maybe even 5…

  3. Yeah…CP3 went too far there…but Chauncey does completely change the complexion of this team. He plays solid D and adds another dimension to the Clippers offense with his ability to spread the defense. With him, Mo, Nick Young, and Chris, you got three guys who can hjit 40-45% from 3.

  4. CB led the Pistons to a title. One of the most clutch player, can shoot with the best, is a leader, headstrong, physically strong, 3pt shooter, sets up players in right spots, good D, good person.

    • The clutch aspect of it all is way overrated… He’s one of the guys who takes the most clutch shots, but the % of makes really isn’t good.

  5. They were one Chauncey Billups away from winning a game against the Spurs…

  6. I know most nba players never finished college, but could they please stop butchering the english language?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *